Nicky Woolf in America

The view from Middle America

Syndicate contentRSS

Romney and Obama: what their choice of words reveal

Debates favour style over substance.

Obama. Photograph: Getty Images
Obama. Photograph: Getty Images

Last night was the last Presidential debate, which showed a win for Obama – but these debates are much more style over substance. Here's a quick analysis of some of the words they used.

The biggest word for both Obama and Romney last night (other than the common words like “the” or “a”) was “going” (though in Obama's case “make” and “sure” run it close to the wire, implying that surety and stability are more important for the President). “Going” is a pregnant word; it implies that both candidates were looking to prove that their foreign policies have forward momentum, at least, and the similarities between the two debating styles don't end there.

Both candidates really did spend more time talking about home and economic issues than about foreign policy. Romney said “economy” more times – 16 – and “budget” - 15 – than Middle East and Israel (15 and 14), while Obama mentions “budget” (8) and “deficit” (7) as much as “security” (9) and Osama Bin Laden – who he brought up directly just six times. Both candidates are equal on Israel, incidentally, on 14 mentions.

Romney is more concerned about The Bomb than Obama, mentioning the word “nuclear” 21 times to the President's 14. He also mentioned Iran 19 times to Obama's 15 – making Romney's Iran the most name-checked country in the debate other than the United States itself – though Obama holds the numbers two and three spots with Iraq and China at 18 each.

Romney, despite basing large parts of his campaign around Chinese currency-manipulation, mentions China only 12 times; 6 less than Obama. Britain's only mention in the debate comes only when Romney says that Pakistan could soon have more nuclear warheads than us.

Mitt did speak faster than the President, though, cramming 8,368 words into the 41 minutes and 7 seconds he had the floor. Obama spoke for 35 seconds longer over the debate – but only managed 7,161 words. Over the course of the three debates Obama has spoken for quite a bit longer – eight minutes and eight seconds – than Mitt Romney, for a total of 128 minutes and 36 seconds.

Once again, making this the third debate in a row where this point has gone the President's way, the meme-point went to Obama. Following on from “binders full of women” and “Big Bird”, this one was for the line: “you mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets,” which has already spawned spoof accounts and facebook pages. He also won the best line of the night, with “the 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back.”

Post-debate polling has called a win for Obama. CNN had the President winning 48-40 per cent, while CBS had him at 63-33 per cent and Reuters at 53 to 23 per cent. It was a fairly solid rout by the incumbent president, all told. But what this tells us is about the style – Obama talked directly at and about his opponent much more, saying “Romney” 22 times and “Governor” 36 times. Meanwhile, Romney said “President” only 30 times and didn't mention his opponent by name once.

If patriotism counted for anything, though, the challenger would have won: Romney used the word “America” a whopping 28 times, exactly double Obama's count.

Here are two wordles of the debates:

http://www.wordle.net/delete?index=5902557&d=LKEV <Obama

http://www.wordle.net/show/wrdl/5902558/Untitled2 <Romney

10 comments

NeilD's picture

WHO IS REALLY KEEPING YOUR TAXES LOW?
VOTE REPUBLICAN IF YOU WANT YOUR TAXES TO UP!
If you're in the middle class, House Republicans want your taxes to go up.
Way up.
That's what a study of the Joint Economic Committee just concluded -- and what the nonpartisan experts at the Tax Policy Center found, too.
It's a deceptive plan to drastically reduce taxes for the rich and make it look like your tax rate would go down, too -- while actually eliminating things the middle class counts on, like tax breaks for employer-provided health insurance, mortgage interest, state and local taxes, and retirement savings.

This is how the Washington Post reported it:

"The net result: Married couples [earning $100,000 to $200,000 per year] would pay an additional $2,700 annually to the Internal Revenue Service, on top of the tax increases that are scheduled to hit every American household when the George W. Bush-era cuts expire at the end of the year.”

"Households earning more than $1 million a year, meanwhile, could see a net tax cut of about $300,000 annually.”

SeptimusBrope's picture

I really can't make my mind up which corporate-sponsored, multi-millionaire, warmongering, sinister crackpot to support.

John Cheese's picture

Romney has never taken a government salary, won't this time either.. vs Mooch the vacationer doing her 35 person euro-vacay & flying the Double AF1's up to the Vineyard. See any difference?

Terry Chillean (miner)'s picture

Yep...ones a billionaire that made his money putting
honest Americans on the bread line.
The others the President.
I take it that you work for free?
Oh sorry I forgot...your a 15 year old with
a weak grasp on most things.

sw's picture

It is interesting that 16 is more than 15, and that 15 is more than 14 but both 8 and 7 are as much as 9.

jankaas's picture

so neither of them mentioned God? shocking. i would have expected some sort of collective seizure from the likes of Fox.

Posh Tosh's picture

"Ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines" - classic!

I am glad I do note vote in the US elections as would be between a rock and an hard place, as I am with the 3 parties in the UK, that are all lead by the same bankers.

Reebo's picture

This is wrong: "Britain's only mention in the debate comes only when Romney says that Pakistan could soon have more nuclear warheads than us." Britain was also mentioned when Romney said that the US's defence spendding was larger than China's, Frances, and Britain's combined.

Reebo's picture

This is wrong: "Britain's only mention in the debate comes only when Romney says that Pakistan could soon have more nuclear warheads than us." Britain was also mentioned when Romney said that the US's defence spendding was larger than China's, Frances, and Britain's combined.

Keir's picture

Reveals.

Latest tweets