Show Hide image

Leveson Inquiry cost £1.9m in first six months

Official figures show the cost to the taxpayer of the inquiry into the media.

The Leveson Inquiry has cost the taxpayer almost £2m in its first six months -- including more than £600,000 in legal fees.

According to official figures it cost £1,992,600 to run the inquiry from mid-July to 31 January.

The single biggest expense was operating costs, which came to £682,100, but this was closely followed by payouts to lawyers, with counsel to the inquiry - including Robert Jay QC and Carine Patry Hoskins - pocketing £536,100.

A further £89,500 went to barristers providing assistance to counsel to the inquiry.

A total of £67,500 was spent on remuneration for the inquiry's panel of assessors, though it emerged that two of the six-strong team - Liberty director of human rights Shami Chakrabarti and ex-Ofcom chairman Lord Currie - have waived their right to claim fees or expenses for the duration of the inquiry.

Visit Press Gazette to read more.

Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Is anyone prepared to solve the NHS funding crisis?

As long as the political taboo on raising taxes endures, the service will be in financial peril. 

It has long been clear that the NHS is in financial ill-health. But today's figures, conveniently delayed until after the Conservative conference, are still stunningly bad. The service ran a deficit of £930m between April and June (greater than the £820m recorded for the whole of the 2014/15 financial year) and is on course for a shortfall of at least £2bn this year - its worst position for a generation. 

Though often described as having been shielded from austerity, owing to its ring-fenced budget, the NHS is enduring the toughest spending settlement in its history. Since 1950, health spending has grown at an average annual rate of 4 per cent, but over the last parliament it rose by just 0.5 per cent. An ageing population, rising treatment costs and the social care crisis all mean that the NHS has to run merely to stand still. The Tories have pledged to provide £10bn more for the service but this still leaves £20bn of efficiency savings required. 

Speculation is now turning to whether George Osborne will provide an emergency injection of funds in the Autumn Statement on 25 November. But the long-term question is whether anyone is prepared to offer a sustainable solution to the crisis. Health experts argue that only a rise in general taxation (income tax, VAT, national insurance), patient charges or a hypothecated "health tax" will secure the future of a universal, high-quality service. But the political taboo against increasing taxes on all but the richest means no politician has ventured into this territory. Shadow health secretary Heidi Alexander has today called for the government to "find money urgently to get through the coming winter months". But the bigger question is whether, under Jeremy Corbyn, Labour is prepared to go beyond sticking-plaster solutions. 

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.