Return to: Home | World Affairs | Middle East

Who was Abdul Wahhab?

Sophie Elmhirst

Published 14 May 2009

The life of the Islamic cleric who shaped Saudi Arabia

A Muslim performs the Jamarat - stoning of Satan - ritual in Mina, Saudi Arabia

Historians differ on the detail of Abdul Wahhab’s life, but it is widely agreed he was born in the town of al-Uyayna, in the Nejd , in 1703. Tutored by his father in the strict Hanbali school of Islamic jurisprudence, Wahhab studied in Basra in southern Iraq, where debates with Islamic scholars led him to decide reform was needed.

Wahhab’s main theological argument during his lifetime was for a more rigorous, conservative interpretation of Islam, in particular advocating monotheism in line with the Salafi tradition.

Salafis follow early interpretations of Islam from the time of the Prophet Muhammad and his contemporaries, seeing later innovations (such as the veneration of saints by some Sufi sects) as unwelcome and even heretical. Wahhab was able to implement some of his legal interpretations, such as insisting that a woman accused of adultery be stoned, when he returned home in 1740. His followers included the town’s ruler, but his power alarmed other influential local figures and he was eventually banished.

Wahhab was then invited to settle in neighbouring Dirriyah by its ruler, Sheikh Muhammad al-Saud. A pact was made between the two men in which al-Saud promised to put Wahhab’s teachings into practice in return for political support. A marriage between al-Saud’s eldest son and Wahhab’s daughter sealed the union.
To some contemporary Muslim scholars, Wahhab was a pious and respected thinker who encouraged a more literal reading of the Quran. Others thought Wahhab’s views were sharp departures from the mainstream of Islam, and accused him of being fixated with gathering power to himself.

His influence endures today. Both the Saudi justice minister and the country’s Grand Mufti are descended from him, and Saudi Arabia’s legal system remains one of the world’s harshest. Public executions, in places such as Riyadh’s “Chop Chop Square”, are frequent (there were roughly 150 in 2007) and women had no vote in the first nationwide municipal elections in 2005.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

IndigoJo
15 May 2009 at 00:19

His name was Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhab. NOT Abdul-Wahhab; that was his father! If you want to refer to him by his surname, it's Ibn Abdul-Wahhab (or Ibn Abdil-Wahhab, as it would be pronounced in Arabic).

txc876
15 May 2009 at 19:07

Your incorrect headline betrays a fundamental gap in understanding.

iihau
21 May 2009 at 10:39

Neat summary from wikipedia articles on ibn Abd-al-Wahhab and Wahhabism, with mistaken name.

OrientXpress
31 May 2009 at 17:55

The Wahabist thinking is fundamentally opposed to any sort of way forward with the rest of the worlds people- their cultures, identities and self-being. If it had been left to these Bedouins, islam would not have even crossed Arabian desert - let alone reach as far as Suamtra in the east and the lands of the Vandals/Al Andalus in the west.

It was only due the fact that Islam bought order, new ideas and hope to people that it fluorished. in my own region in south Asia Islam was propagated by the mystics of Sufism and in the north the Ottomons offered a similar branch of Islam.

It is high time that the bulk of Islam jettisoned the blind following of Saudi policy. For the creed of wahhab has nothing to offer Islam except its demise as a mainstream faith.

Rashid Mughal
20 June 2009 at 14:46

Dear Sophie Elmhirst,

You'd perform a great service to humanity at large if you set out to connect the dots to various schools of Wahhabi doctrine and the malicious science of Wahhabism all the way to Osama bin Laden and the new crop of good-for-nothing Islamist jihadis who are causing death and destruction around the world in the name of Islam.

Regards,

Rashid Mughal, Editor & Writer

Toronto

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Sophie Elmhirst

Sophie Elmhirst is a contributing writer at the New Statesman. She previously worked for Save the Children, the Guardian and Prospect.

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker