Return to: Home | World Affairs | Middle East

What I saw in Fallujah

Dahr Jamail

Published 01 November 2007

Dahr Jamail set out to report the truth about the US invasion of Iraq and its terrible impact on daily life. Determined to remain independent of the army, he embedded himself instead with the Iraqi people

On the day martial law was declared, US tanks began rolling into the outskirts of Fallujah, while war planes continued to pound the city with as many as 50,000 residents still inside. Iyad Allawi, the US-installed interim prime minister, laid out the six steps for implementing his "security law". These entailed a 6pm curfew in Fallujah, the blocking of all highways except for emergencies and for government vehicles, the closure of all city and government services, a ban on all weapons in Fallujah, the closure of Iraq's borders with Syria and Jordan (except to allow passage to food trucks and vehicles carrying other necessary goods), and the closure of Baghdad International Airport for 48 hours.

Meanwhile, in the US, most corporate media outlets were busy spreading the misinformation that Fallujah had fallen under the control of the Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. There was no available evidence that Zarqawi had ever set foot inside the city. It was amply evident that the resistance in the city was composed primarily of people from Fallujah itself. However, that did not deter the establishment media, which portrayed the assault on the city as a hostage intervention situation.

As they had done during the April siege, the military raided and occupied Fallujah general hospital, cutting it off from the rest of the city. On 8 November 2004 the New York Times reported, "The assault against Fallujah began here Sunday night as American Special Forces and Iraqi troops burst into Fallujah General Hospital and seized it within an hour." Of course, this information was immediately followed by the usual parroting of US military propaganda, "At 10pm, Iraqi troops clambered off seven-ton trucks, sprinting with American Special Forces soldiers around the side of the main building of the hospital, considered a refuge for insurgents and a centre of propaganda against allied forces, entering the complex to bewildered looks from patients and employees."

Harb al-Mukhtar, my interpreter and driver, arrived at my hotel the next morning in a sombre mood. "How can we live like this, we are trapped in our own country. You know Dahr, everyone is praying for God to take revenge on the Americans. Everyone!" He said even in their private prayers people were praying for God to take vengeance on the Americans for what they were doing in Fallujah. "Everyone I've talked to the last couple of nights, 80 or 90 people, have admitted that they are doing this," he said as I collected my camera and notepad to prepare to leave. Out on the streets of Baghdad, the anxiety was palpable. The threat of being kidnapped or car bombed, or simply robbed, relentlessly played on our minds as Harb and I went about conducting interviews that had been prearranged. We tried to minimise our time on the streets by returning to my hotel immediately on completing interviews. The security situation, already horrible, was deteriorating further with each passing day.

That night, when Salam Talib arrived at my hotel to work on a radio despatch with me, he had a wild look in his eyes and sweat beads on his forehead. "My friend has just been killed, and he was one of my best friends," he said staring out my window. Salam went on to tell me that a relative of another of his friends had been missing for six days. "This morning, his body was brought to his family by someone who found it on the road. The body had been shot twice in the chest and twice in the head. There were visible signs of torture, and the four bullet shells that were used to kill him had been placed in his trouser pockets. This news has driven me crazy, Dahr. The number of people killed here is growing so fast every day," he said, his hands raised in that familiar gesture of despair. "When I was a child, it was common to have some family member who was killed in the war with Iran. But now, it feels as though everyone is dying every day."

Not yet one full week into the latest assault on Fallujah, the flames of resistance had engulfed much of Baghdad and other areas in Iraq. In Baghdad alone, neighbourhoods like Amiriyah, Abu Ghraib, Adhamiya and al-Dora had fallen mostly under the control of the resistance. In these areas, and much of the rest of Baghdad, US patrols were few and far between, since they were being attacked so often. People we interviewed showed no surprise at fighting having rapidly spread across other cities. It was expected, because the general belief was that the resistance had fled Fallujah prior to the siege. Most of the fighters had melted away to other areas to choose effective methods to strike the enemy. Fighting had thus spread across much of Baghdad, Baquba, Latafiya, Ramadi, Samarra, Mosul, Khaldiya and Kirkuk just days into Operation Phantom Fury.

Media repression

Media repression during the second siege of Fallujah was intense. The "100 Orders" penned by former US administrator Bremer included Order 65, passed on 20 March 2004, which established an Iraqi communications and media commission. This commission had powers to control the media because it had complete control over licensing and regulating telecommunications, broadcasting, information services, and media establishments. On 28 June, when the US handed over power to a "sovereign" Iraqi interim government, Bremer simply passed on his authority to Iyad Allawi, who had long-standing ties with the British intelligence service MI6 and the CIA. The media commission sent out an order just after the assault on Fallujah commenced ordering news organisations to "stick to the government line on the US-led offensive in Fallujah or face legal action". The warning was circulated on Allawi's letterhead. The letter also asked the media in Iraq to "set aside space in your news coverage to make the position of the Iraqi government, which expresses the aspirations of most Iraqis, clear".

On the ground, aside from the notorious bombing and then banning of al-Jazeera, other instances of media repression were numerous. A journalist for the al-Arabiya network, who attempted to get inside Fallujah, was detained by the military, as was a French freelance photographer named Corentin Fleury, who was staying at my hotel. Fleury, a soft-spoken, wiry man, was detained by the US military along with his interpreter, 28-year-old Bahktiyar Abdulla Hadad, when they were leaving Fallujah just before the siege of the city began. They had worked in the city for nine days leading up to the siege, and were held for five days in a military detention facility outside the city.

"They were very nervous and they asked us what we had seen, and looked through all my photos, asking me questions about them," he said as we talked in my room one night. He told me he had photographed homes destroyed by US war planes. Despite appeals by the French government to the US military to free his translator and return Fleury's confiscated camera equipment and his photos, there had been no luck in attaining either. (When I had last seen Fleury in February 2005, Hadad was still being held by the US military.)

The military was maintaining a strict cordon around most of Fallujah. As I could not enter the city, I set out to interview doctors and patients who had fled and were presently working in various hospitals around Baghdad. While visiting Yarmouk Hospital looking for more information about Fallujah, I came across several children from areas south of Baghdad. One of these was a 12-year-old girl, Fatima Harouz, from Latifiya. She lay dazed in a crowded hospital room, limply waving her bruised arm at the flies. Her shins, shattered by bullets from US soldiers when they fired through the front door of her house, were both covered by casts. Small plastic drainage bags filled with red fluid sat upon her abdomen, where she took shrapnel from another bullet. Her mother told us, "They attacked our home, and there weren't even any resistance fighters in our area."

Victims' testament

Fatima's uncle was shot and killed, his wife had been wounded, and their home was ransacked by soldiers. "Before they left, they killed all our chickens." A doctor who was with us looked at me and asked, "This is the freedom. In their Disneyland are there kids just like this?"

Another young woman, Rana Obeidy, had been walking home in Baghdad with her brother two nights earlier. She assumed the soldiers had shot her and her brother because he was carrying a bottle of soda. She had a chest wound where a bullet had grazed her, but had struck her little brother and killed him. In another room, a small boy from Fallujah lay on his stomach. Shrapnel from a grenade thrown into his home by a US soldier had entered his body through his back and was implanted near his kidney. An operation had successfully removed the shrapnel, but his father had been killed by what his mother described as "the haphazard shooting of the Americans". The boy, Amin, lay in his bed vacillating between crying with pain and playing with his toy car.

Later, I found myself at a small but busy supply centre in Baghdad set up to distribute goods to refugees from Fallujah. Standing in an old, one-storey building that used to be a vegetable market, I watched as people walked around wearily to obtain basic foodstuffs, blankets or information about housing. "They kicked all the journalists out of Fallujah so they could do whatever they want," said Kassem Mohammed Ahmed, who had escaped from Fallujah three days before. "The first thing they did was bomb the hospitals because that is where the wounded have to go. Now we see that wounded people are in the street and the soldiers are rolling their tanks over them. This happened so many times. What you see on the TV is nothing. That is just one camera. What you cannot see is much more."

There were also stories of soldiers not discriminating between civilians and resistance fighters. Another man, Abdul Razaq Ismail, had arrived from Fallujah one week earlier and had been helping with the distribution of supplies to other refugees, having received similar help himself. Loading a box with blankets to send to a refugee camp, he said, "There are dead bodies on the ground and nobody can bury them. The Americans are dropping some of the bodies into the Euphrates River near Fallujah. They are pulling some bodies with tanks and leaving them at the soccer stadium." Another man sat nearby nodding his head. He couldn't stop crying. After a while, he said he wanted to talk to us. "They bombed my neighbourhood and we used car jacks to raise the blocks of concrete to get dead children out from under them."

Another refugee, Abu Sabah, an older man in a torn shirt and dusty pants, told of how he escaped with his family, just the day before, while soldiers shot bullets over their heads, killing his cousin. "They used these weird bombs that first put up smoke in a cloud, and then small pieces fell from the air with long tails of smoke behind them. These exploded on the ground with large fires that burned for half an hour. They used these near the train tracks. When anyone touched those fires, their body burned for hours."

This was the first time I had heard a refugee describing the use of white phosphorous incendiary weapons by the US military, fired from artillery into Fallujah. Though it is not technically a banned weapon, it is a violation of the Geneva Conventions to use white phosphorous in an area where civilians may be hit. I heard similar descriptions in the coming days and weeks, both from refugees and doctors who had fled the city.

Several doctors I interviewed had told me they had been instructed by the interim government not to speak to any journalists about the patients they were receiving from Fallujah. A few of them told me they had even been instructed by the Shia-controlled Ministry of Health not to accept patients from Fallujah.

That night I interviewed a spokesman for the Iraq Red Crescent, who told me none of their relief teams had been allowed into Fallujah, and the military said it would be at least two more weeks before any refugees would be allowed back into their city. Collecting information from doctors in the city, he had estimated that at least 800 civilians had been killed so far in the siege.

The second assault on Fallujah was a monument to brutality and atrocity made in the United States of America. Like the Spanish city of Guernica during the 1930s, and Grozny in the 1990s, Fallujah is our monument of excess and overkill. It was soon to become, even for many in the US military, a textbook case of the wrong way to handle a resistance movement. Another case of winning the battle and losing the war.

Conquerors' truth

I would like to say that I decided to go to Iraq for philosophical reasons, because I believe that an informed citizenry is the bedrock of any healthy democracy. But I went to Iraq for personal reasons. I was tormented by the fact that the government of my country illegally invaded and then occupied a country that it had bombed in 1991. Because the government of my country had asphyxiated Iraq with more than a decade's worth of "genocidal" sanctions (in the words of former United Nations Humanitarian Co-ordinator for Iraq Denis Halliday). The government of my country then told lies, which were obediently repeated by an unquestioning media in order to justify the invasion and occupation. I felt that I had blood on my hands because the government had been left unchecked.

My going to Iraq was an act of desperation that has since transformed itself into a bond to that country and so many of her people. There were stories there that begged to be heard and told again. We are defined by story. Our history, our memory, our perceptions of the future, are all built and held within stories. As a US citizen complicit in the devastation of Iraq, I was already bound up in the story of that country. I decided to go to learn what that story really was.

While the vast majority of the reporting of Iraq was provided by journalists availing themselves of the Pentagon-sponsored "embed" programme, I chose to look for stories of real life and "embed"myself with the Iraqi people. The US military side of the occupation is overly represented by most mainstream outlets. I consciously decided to focus on the Iraqi side of the story. The story of the many oppressed peoples of the world is rarely recorded by the few who oppress. We are taught that the truth is objective fact as written down by the conquerors.

The above is extracted from "Beyond the Green Zone: Despatches From an Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq" (Haymarket Books, £13.99), which is available from 8 November

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

18 comments from readers

Douglas Chalmers
01 November 2007 at 10:34

Quote: "...to report the truth about the US invasion of Iraq .....he embedded himself instead with the Iraqi people..."

Oh Baghdad..They Killed You! - Egyptian singer Ahmed AbdRapo " ...ask not the devil, but the brother who sold us..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9WUpIcsJRw&NR=1

Carl Jones
01 November 2007 at 15:28

Dahr Jamail: I`ve read strories accredited to you on the "alternative news media" for years and for a while, you were one of the very few genuine news sources reporting from Iraq....this when the MSM were telling non-stop lies, or in the BBC`s case, no real news at all.

This article seems to be a watered down version of what you`ve written in the past. You fail to directly mention the tactics used and war crimes commtted by Major General Kimmits and the US suipers who were picking off women and children as they fled the city; something the US military requested...male Iraqi`s including boys, please remain, so we can MURDER you!!

Maybe you could tell Newstatesman readers that the US mlitary used a fussion bomb in Falluja? Or the use of microwave weapons?

Talk about selling your soul.

writeon
01 November 2007 at 15:37

Oh, it's awful and so shameful, what we've done to Iraq and all in the name of "Freedom 'n' Democracy"! If a democracy can blithely do what we've done to Iraq, and there are no public trials of the war-criminals who are responsible for the horror and the lies, then you can flush this type of democracy down the toilet! My wife started to have second thoughts about democracy after Bush got elected for a second time. I thought she was being a bit harsh on the Americans. But now I'm beginning to bend towards her view. We seem to have created a perversion of democracy, which we insist is still fundamentally democratic, despite all the contrary evidence. It seems our political leaders, and this isn't just confined to the UK or the US, are really professional liars who apparently succeed by getting a majority of the electorate to to swallow and believe what they say! Now, by no stretch of the imagination can this parody of democracy be regarded as acceptable. It is an illusion, and an increasingly dangerous one, because it's used to justify and obscure the monumental crimes we perpetrate in order to gain access to markets and raw materials.

Fundisi
03 November 2007 at 09:55

Nothing new here. This is what civilised white western nations do and have been doing for several centuries now in every corner of the earth

Eagle Eye
04 November 2007 at 11:00

These comments are depressing suggesting as they do that evil somehow stems uniquely from western so called democracies. The truth is that power corrupts and the more powerful a nation is the more damage it can do to pursue its interests. There is plenty of evil coming from other quarters too and none of it is justified.

Cybertiger
04 November 2007 at 13:30

@Eagle Eye

"The truth is that power corrupts and the more powerful a nation is the more damage it can do to pursue its interests. There is plenty of evil ... "

Do you think the Iranians were justified in the naming of the 'Great Satan'?

Eagle Eye
04 November 2007 at 14:35

Perhaps from the perspective of the Iranian leadership they are justified in calling the US the 'Great Satan'. Looking for an enemy is a well known leadership strategy but very much a product of 'power corrupts' I would say. There is nothing rational or measured about such a statement, not characteristics for which the Iranian leadership is well known. If we want peace we need much better leaders than we have at the moment. The Bush/Blair axis was a case study in shallow, ill-informed leadership that will probably take decades to recover from. Unfortunately 'democracy' doesn't seem much better at picking leaders than most other selection processes. It's one strength, though, is that their terms are usually limited.

Cybertiger
04 November 2007 at 18:41

@Eagle Eye

"Unfortunately 'democracy' doesn't seem much better at picking leaders than most other selection processes. It's one strength, though, is that their terms are usually limited."

One dolt just follows another - along the Bush/Blair axis of evil ...

Cybertiger
04 November 2007 at 18:46

@writeon

“My wife started to have second thoughts about democracy after Bush got elected for a second time.”

I have felt nothing but contempt for Americans since they allowed the SCOTUS to select the idiot POTUS ... first time round. And Americans garnered no respect from me for allowing the impeachment of Clinton for lying about sex with that woman ... while allowing another wretched woman to agree that the deaths of half a million Iraqi children were a price worth paying ... to further American interests. Americans are simply contemptible critters ... by a huge democratic majority.

Carl Jones
05 November 2007 at 00:15

Eagle Eye; it is depressing, I suppose we grew up believing we (the West) held the moral high ground, but the NWO excesses of their sham war on terror, Afghanistan and Iraq has shattered this illusion so totally, that I now believe the US is still controlled from London, the Second World War was a US/UK construct. "Hitler was a British Agent" (google)...ect, ect, ect.

The idea that total power corrupts is wrong...it assumes that the holder of total power aquired it recently and are lost with their new toy. The real holders of power have held for so long, they know nothing else. To them it is as mundane as writing a shopping list, the fact that they enjoy it is nither here nor there.

jill
05 November 2007 at 20:08

Not ALL the Soldiers were there to just shoot and kill or run over the injured. Many fought back with some of the orders they were recieving and refused to do things they were told because they had a caring heart. But they did shoot when they ended up with out any other choice. If someone was trying to shoot them, then they did what they had to do to protect each other and themself. Many honest Soldiers gave their lifes to protect their buddies and did their best to take care of their troops. War is ugly and my heart and prayers go out to ALL the people that have been hurt or lost a family member or friend. Not everyone wanted to pick sides and have a war. But there are many that want to keep battling and they don't care who they kill. It's not just the US Soldiers -- It's the Insurgents, groups from all around with different backgrounds. You see this every where you go, even in the States, but it's always so much worse and more noticable when there is a war going on.There are a lot of people that are always fighting for control and power. I don't believe in war, or gangs but I do believe in protecting ourselves from the ones that are always looking for a fight.. I don't support this war or Bush, but I do support our Soldiers and I pray everyday for God to help protect the Soldiers, The Children and all the victims that had nothing to do with this war. My heart breaks for them. Most the Soldiers were told lies before joining, and most thought they were doing something to protect our freedom until they arrived in Badhdad and found out most of the war is based on political and groverment and BUSH'S Ideas. I know many Soldiers that if they could do things over, they would not have joined. Nothing wrong with protecting our freedom but this war isn't just about freedom it's more about doing Bush's dirty work.

writeon
05 November 2007 at 23:02

Something that bothers me is the concept of proportionality in warfare. Of course the attacks of 9/11 were appalling and thousands were killed, yet how do we reply? We basically trash two countries, bomb them out of the modern age and kill hundreds of thousands of them. We seem to be so vicious and vengful and ready to spill so much blood.

Yet despite our massively destructive and bloody war of terror, we still think of ourselves as the real victim, how do we manage such a level of self-delusion, mixed with ignorance?

If 9/11 was blowback for countless acts of agression from our side, what on earth will the blowback and consequences of the destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan be? And don't get me started on what'll happen if we attack Iran as well!

Cybertiger
06 November 2007 at 21:15

@writeon

"We seem to be so vicious and vengful and ready to spill so much blood .... If 9/11 was blowback for countless acts of agression from our side, what on earth will the blowback and consequences of the destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan be?"

Look at the American 'death penalty' - at home and abroad. Revenge is sweet ... and very, very expensive ... for Americans.

PS. And remember the words of John Milton from Paradise Lost,

"Revenge, at first though sweet, Bitter ere long back on itself recoils."

Carl Jones
06 November 2007 at 21:44

9/11 blowback....you are truely deluded. 9/11 was a NWO ignition event to start the war on terror which replaced the Cold War. If the Newstatesman wants to do a review article I`ll be very happy to DESTROY the official account. A word of warning, it could be very long.lol

Cybertiger
07 November 2007 at 19:37

Revenge, indiscriminate and disproportionate, is the prime motivator for the average American, today, yesterday and tomorrow. In my view, vengeance was the motivation of the neo-Barbarian assault on Fallujah, under vicious, vengeful, illegitimate clouds of white phosphorous – to the eternal shame of all Americans.

writeon
07 November 2007 at 21:09

O.K. let's really put the cat among the pigeons. Put the Iraqi model in a wider perspective. Throw caution to the wind, and talk straight down the line. After all, the years of plenty are coming to an end, and we're heading towards hell in a bucket, so what's there to lose? Bugger British reserve and who cares about ricicule?

Years ago, way before 9/11, I had a sort of vision of the future. In a world of increasing scarcity, primarily vital raw materials and especially energy resources, the United States turned itself in a gigantic version of Israel. But the US wouldn't just be at war with Arabs, it would be at war with most of the third world. Its soldiers would be fighting in the slums and shanty towns, and the palaces, and mines and the oil fields.

It would have its own version of the occupied territories, only this time they would be whole countries. It would be involved in protracted and bloody guerilla warfare, lasting for ever. It would isolate itself from the rest of the world, become an agressive war machine, turn its back on its democratic traditions, and not surprisingly, end up as feared and unpopular as Israel has become.

The more it opressed and exploited its enemies and the more death and destruction it rained down, the greater and angrier the reaction against them would become. Until, like Israel, the United States, also ruled by a psuedo-religious, militeristic, cult, would finally envoke the Sampson Option.

Cybertiger
07 November 2007 at 22:10

@writeon

"Until, like Israel, the United States, also ruled by a psuedo-religious, militeristic, cult, would finally envoke the Sampson Option."

The Sampson Option is, of course, indiscriminate vengeance on a massive, world ending scale. On this, Israel and the US are united … bring it on … Armageddon.

serena1313
12 November 2007 at 06:05

** writeon

Your vision portrays the transformation America has undergone for the past 7 years. It is not finished yet by any means. Thankfully visions are not encased in stone -- meaning if we do not like what is shown we can change the future. Simply by making different choices. It is called free will.

If the American public "elects" a Bush-clone preventing [your vision] from coming into full fruition becomes all but impossible. That is why we, the people, need to be diligent about whom we choose to "lead."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Instead of institutionalizing democracy Bush institutionalized oppression and fear. There is no functioning government in Iraq, only a military-police-state exists. If Bush thinks that is freedom for the Iraqi people he is sadly and unmistakably delusional. Iraq belongs to the Iraqi citizens, not Bush, not Cheney, not multi-national corporations, not the US; Iraqis are best equipped to settle their differences, not America.

What is taking place in Iraq is shameful and disgraceful. The number of Iraqi men, women and children who have died as a result of US military aggression now exceeds 1.1 million.

Once Saddam was taken from power the "coalition" forces should have left. When they didn't, the perception inarguably changed from liberators to occupiers.

Iraqis are the only ones capable of resolving the conflict that now exists between the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds, something not of their making. The military's solution to ending the conflict: ethnic cleansing. That will not bring lasting peace. It is a temporary short-term fix that in the long-run will cause more problems. But Bush was never much in favour of long-term fixes when the short-term would suffice.

Meanwhile everyday more people are killed and maimed. Everyday hatred against America and the other "coalition" nations. Everyday the Iraqis continue to suffer. Everyday more join in resisting the foreign occupiers.

American troops need to leave ASAP, but that, unfortunately, will never happen as long as Bush is in office. Continuing to make the same failed policy decisions expecting different outcomes portrays a man clearly over his head, unconcerned about the horrors inflicted on the Iraqi people.

The sooner the US returns the country to its rightful owners, the Iraqis, the sooner they can begin rebuilding their country after decades of crushing sanctions and 5 years of US military oppression. The least America can do is offer reparations to rebuild their country as they see fit, not how Bush sees fit.

Bush, Cheney and the neocons are directly responsible for destroying an entire society, a nation, and the deaths of millions. History will not be kind.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker