In Australia, hard-won rights are being buried beneath corporate might.

The claim that the public benefits from a "raucous press" is almost entirely fictional. In the meantime, the likes of Lucy Meadows are trampled on.

The New Statesman does not see its interests served by regulation designed to suit politicians.

Much of the press seems to be belly-down on the supermarket floor, punching the linoleum, kicking out and screaming WAAH WAAH BUT I DON’T WANT TO BE REGULATED. Here are ten truths the media needs to hear.

There will be a "tougher" press regulator, we are told. But what of all the hours of testimony and hard-fought recommendations in the Leveson report? Were they all for nothing?

Interrogating the Mail on Sunday's tissue-thin front-page story.

The must-read comment and analysis from today's papers.

I was present for the author's so-called "attack" on the Duchess of Cambridge. It was nothing of the sort.

Italian magazine Chi — owned by Silvio Berlusconi — has published the unauthorised pictures of the Duchess.

Jon Holmes' diary.

Featuring a cameo from Mail Online.

Heavy cross-promotion.

Peter Wilby's "First Thoughts" column.

Culture Secretary's special adviser warned Telegraph reporter of her boss's involvement in press regulation.