Bereaved say "death knocks" better than social media
A study finds groups and families may prefer that journalists visit personally.
By Andrew Pugh Published 14 February 2012
A new study has found that personal visits, or "death knocks", following sudden deaths may be better than journalists "snubbing" bereaved families and instead relying on social media.
It also found that attempts to protect the bereaved through regulation following the Leveson Inquiry could "backfire" by discouraging journalists from contacting families.
The study by Jackie Newton, of Liverpool John Moores University, and Dr Sallyanne Duncan, of the University of Strathclyde, involved interviewing 49 reporters from the regional press and six editors or senior journalists with responsibility for the use of social media in "death knock stories".
Read more at Press Gazette
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

