Fabricate that fear
Those snatched from their homes in Britain following 11 September 2001 have all but vanished into an
By John Pilger Published 26 June 2008The lawyer Gareth Peirce, celebrated for her defence of miscarriage of justice victims, wrote recently: "Over the years of the conflict, every lawless action on the part of the British state provoked a similar reaction: internment, 'shoot to kill', the use of torture . . . brutally obtained false confessions and fabricated evidence. This was registered by the community most affected, but the British public, in whose name these actions were taken, remained ignorant." Referring to the conflict in Northern Ireland, she was drawing a comparison with "our new suspect community", people of Muslim faith, against whom a vicious, sectarian and mostly unreported war is well under way.
As Peirce points out, "internment, discredited and abandoned in Northern Ireland", now allows, not 42 days, but the "indefinite detention without trial of foreign nationals, the 'evidence' to be heard in secret with the detainee's lawyer not permitted to see the evidence against him". Those snatched from their homes in Britain following 11 September 2001 have all but vanished into an Anglo-American gulag, which in this country joins Belmarsh Prison, where people are consigned to oblivion, with Broadmoor psychiatric prison, where they are sent as they go mad, and with Kafkaesque versions of "home" where others are interred under "control orders". One such home prisoner, wrote Peirce, "a man without arms, was left alone and terrified, unable to leave the flat or to contact anyone without committing a criminal offence, subject to a curfew and allowed no visits unless approved in advance by the Home Office". Going into the garden, arran ging a plumber, speaking to a child's teacher, all require permission. The families go mad, too.
Preferring "a quick death . . . to a slow death here", one man who took a risk and returned to Algeria has been lost in the subcontracted gulag, where his new torturers have given the British government "assurances" and are themselves reassured by the fact that BP, the ethical oil company, has sunk £6bn into getting oil out of Algeria's southern Sahara. Jordan, another subcontractor, is held economically afloat by the US so George W Bush's "renditions" and torture can proceed there. No British court has found any of these people guilty of any crime, but as Tony Blair, a genuine prima facie criminal, put it so well, "the rules of the game have changed".
As in the Irish conflict, it is again the ignorance of us, the public, upon which the state relies. All propaganda is directed at honing this ignorance and fabricating a fear. This is primarily the task of journalists. True fear is in Muslim communities. Visit them and you will find people terrified by your knock on the door, and women who now never go out. In effect, control orders have been served on thousands of British citizens.
As Peirce reminds us, the Irish had allies in the Catholic Church and the 40 million Americans of Irish descent; Muslims are alone as they watch the British state, with its "obstinate incomprehension" of their faith, do to them as it would never do to those of other faiths. You can't imagine Jews treated this way; the profanity is too great. The silence of British Jews, who have the history, is also great.
As the suppressed facts of "terrorism" show, Muslims are by far the most numerous victims - up to a million Iraqis dead, including 500,000 infants, during "sanctions" against Iraq in the 1990s; perhaps another million dead when Blair and his mentor ignited the current inferno; countless killed and maimed in Afghanistan by weapons that include the British thermobaric bomb, designed to suck the air out of human beings. And there is Palestine, an entire nation under a permanent control order.
Reviewing this monstrous record, it is no less than amazing that the world's most violent governments - Britain is now the world's leading arms merchant - have sustained only two retaliations on their home soil. With every hypocritical act, they beckon another. Moreover, wrote Gareth Peirce, "If our government continues on [this destructive] path, we will ultimately have destroyed much of the moral and legal fabric of the society that we claim to be protecting. The choice and the responsibility are entirely ours."
"Was it like this for the Irish?"
by Gareth Peirce, London Review of Books.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


103 comments
ron paul for me all the way
I asked you politely to go away, Jonny Mac but you didn't. And now you are making a complete and utter fool of yourself in front of the whole world. For God's sake have some dignity boy. If you had read my facebook page then you would see that I describe myself as 'independant'. And I am. Fiercely. The only thing that I give a crap about is truth.
JC2
Cybertiger asked,
"Do you think 'the elite', Jewish or otherwise, actually listen to restrained, non violent protest?"
Jonny Mac replied,
"mostly no, occasionally yes"
If democracies don't listen to peaceful protest, then is it surprising that some protesters will turn to violence? What will Palestinians ever gain by peaceful resistance? Zilch. Israel only understands revenge, violence and violent revenge - and if those are absent, then the Holy democracy is free to provoke them. Americans too, enjoy their freedom to exact violent retribution. Non-violence is un-American.
Huh? Who? Obama for mine.
JC2
Excellent work writeon. And Gideon I am glad you didn't take up my suggestion to take a holiday. Then again, who would want to miss this!!!!! People like us will have the rest of our lives to take as many bloody holidays as we like. And while we lie on the beach earning 20% Jonny Mac will be working his butt off bringing us Pina Coladas. hahaha. Justice.
JC2
Oh yeah. Probably better leave my Facebook address if I expect people to take a geez. So here it is if anyone is interested (That means you Jonny Mac).
www.facebook.com/people/Matthew_J_Costigan/1311877403
you dont know who ron paul is? JC2 you surprise me. arent you the one who reads beyond the MSM? if you did surely you would know which side obama bats for
Does any one else get bugged by pilger style of writing the way he never sticks to and fully explains his point.
A proper journalist would give a moral and practical argument justifying his position pilger on the other hand jumps around from one subject to another never really arguing anything fully.
This article is better then most of his, usually he can't even stick to the one decade, but a bit about gaza a bit about northern ireland some very exagerated comparison to serious human rights abuse like people being disappeared and soviet gulag doesn't constitute a real refution of the "need" for the government to be able to hold or restrict the freedom suspected terrorist threat without a trial that argument may exist but like really all his article these day he lazyly doesn't make it. I actually feel insulted that the author thinks i will be convinced with out such argument and i am surprised so many of you aren't also.
Surely we can all agree that attempting to "explain" why the enemy, the terrorists, are fighting us; is not the same thing as "justifying" their methods or motives? Explaining and justifying or excusing are not the same thing.
hahaha. Yeah of course I know who Ron bloody Paul is fairplay. I was just winding you up. Gotcha! But I am still on Obama.
JC2