Registered user login:

My last conversation with Aung San Suu Kyi

John Pilger

Published 04 October 2007

John Pilger recalls the last time he met with Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi

As the people of Burma rise up again, we have had a rare glimpse of Aung San Suu Kyi. There she stood, at the back gate of her lakeside home in Rangoon, where she is under house arrest. She looked very thin. For years, people would brave the roadblocks just to pass by her house and be re assured by the sound of her playing the piano. She told me she would lie awake listening for voices outside and to the thumping of her heart. "I found it difficult to breathe lying on my back after I became ill."

That was a decade ago. Stealing into her house, as I did then, required all the ingenuity of the Burmese underground. Aung San Suu Kyi wore silk and had orchids in her hair. She is a striking, glamorous figure whose face in repose shows the resolve that has seen her along her heroic journey. "What do I call you?" I asked. "Well, if you can't manage the whole thing, friends call me Suu."

"The regime is always saying you are finished, but here you are, hardly finished. How is that?"

"It's because democracy is not finished in Bur ma . . . Look at the courage of the people who go on working for democracy, those who have already been to prison. They know that any day they are likely to be put back there and yet they do not give up."

"But how do you reclaim the power you won at the ballot box with brute power confronting you?" I asked.

"In Buddhism we are taught there are four basic ingredients for success. The first is the will to want it, then you must have the right kind of attitude, then perseverance, then wisdom . . ."

"But the other side has all the guns?"

"Yes, but it's becoming more and more difficult to resolve problems by military means. It's no longer acceptable."

We talked about the willingness of foreign business to come to Burma. I read her a Foreign Office press release: "Through commercial contacts with democratic nations such as Britain, the Burmese people will gain experience of democratic principles." "Not in the least bit," she responded, "because new investments only help a small elite to get richer and richer. Forced labour goes on all over the country, and a lot of the projects are aimed at the tourist trade and are worked by children."

"People I've spoken to regard you as something of a saint, a miracle worker."

"I'm not a saint and you'd better tell the world that!"

"Where are your sinful qualities, then?"

"Er, I've got a short temper."

"What happened to your piano?"

"You mean when the string broke? In this climate pianos do deteriorate and some of the keys were getting stuck, so I broke a string because I was pumping the pedal too hard."

"You lost it?"

"I did."

"It's a very moving scene. Here you are, all alone, and you get so angry you break the piano."

"I told you, I have a hot temper."

"Then how do you cope being alone?"

"Oh, I have my meditation, and I did have a radio . . . I'd look forward to a good book being read on Off the Shelf on the BBC."

"Was there a point when you had to conquer fear?"

"Yes. When I was small in this house. I wandered around in the darkness until I knew where all the demons might be . . . and they weren't there."

For several years after that encounter with Aung San Suu Kyi I tried to phone her. One day I got through. "Thank you so much for the books," she said. "It has been a joy to read widely again." (I had sent her a collection of T S Eliot, her favourite, and Jonathan Coe's political romp What a Carve Up!.) I asked her what was happening outside her house. "Oh, the road is blocked and they [the military] are all over the street . . ."

"Do you worry that you might be trapped in a terrible stalemate?"

"I am really not fond of that expression," she replied rather sternly. "People have been on the streets. That's not a stalemate. The defiance is there in people's lives, day after day . . . No matter the regime's physical power, in the end they can't stop the people. We shall have our time."

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

TMC
04 October 2007 at 16:11

Good to hear what Daw Su wears, how beautiful she is and how she defies fearful ruthless regime. I'm curious to know what Daw Su's political strategy and how she envision to achieve the goal(s), which we don't get to hear much.

TMC
04 October 2007 at 16:12

Good to hear what Daw Su wears, how beautiful she is and how she defies fearful ruthless regime. I'm curious to know what Daw Su's political strategy is and how she envisions to achieve the goal(s), which we don't get to hear much.

Mandalay Thu
05 October 2007 at 06:34

I've never been getting bored of looking her face, her photos and her movements. I adore her so much. Of course, I am. Because I am Myanmar and she is not only she is but also daughter of General Aung San.

Douglas Chalmers
06 October 2007 at 18:22

She is dying of cancer caused by years of stress and suffering while the fat pig Than Shwe is dying of his lifestyle-induced obesity with complications.

Suu Kyi now looks extraordinarily pale, thin and wrought and the general looks puffed and red-faced like he will suffer from a coronary. They are now trying to outlive each other.

There is nothing "romantic" about any of it!!!

GideonPolya
19 October 2007 at 22:01

Excellent and very moving article. When will the World governments individually and collectively (through the UN) take firm, non-violent action against the Burma regime?

The Burma regime DOES have a weakness - the people, corporations and countries (notably Australia, the US and France) variously complicit in its crimes.

See the movie "Total denial" about Western oil companies complicit in Burma regime crimes against humanity. A company linked to the extreme right wing, racist, war-mongering Bush-ite Australian Coalition Government also does big business with Burma.

This is what the makers of "Total Denial" say: "In 1992, two Western oil companies - French TOTAL and UNOCAL, then based in California embark on a joint venture with the Burmese military regime, to build a gas pipeline. The Burmese army, hired by the companies to provide security for the project, forces many in the local population into slave labor. Burned villages, raped women, tortured and killed porters, hundreds of thousands of men, women and children hiding in the jungle is the picture of a silent genocide."

Even if cowardly, dishonest, politically correct racist (PC racist) and corrupt First World governments won't act, ordinary people CAN act (and indeed are OBLIGED to act) by (a) informing others about these atrociities and (b) acting ETHICALLY in all their avoidable dealings with the persons, corporations and countries in any way linked to these horrendous atrocities against the Burmese people.

Read "Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950" (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007; copy in the British Library) and you will discover the horrifying estimation that excess deaths (avoidable deaths, deaths that did not have to happen) under the Burmese military in the period 1962-2007 totalled 16 MILLION.

Please inform everyone you can.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

John Pilger

John Pilger, renowned investigative journalist and documentary film-maker, is one of only two to have twice won British journalism's top award; his documentaries have won academy awards in both the UK and the US. In a New Statesman survey of the 50 heroes of our time, Pilger came fourth behind Aung San Suu Kyi and Nelson Mandela. "John Pilger," wrote Harold Pinter, "unearths, with steely attention facts, the filthy truth. I salute him."

Read More

Vote!

Should the third runway at Heathrow go ahead?