Return to: Home | Culture | Media

The liberal war on democracy

John Pilger

Published 19 March 2007

"Hugo Chávez expresses the kind of genuine exuberant democracy long ago abandoned in Britain"

In Andrew Cockburn's new book, Rumsfeld, the gap between rampant power and its faraway victims is closed. Donald Rumsfeld, US secretary of defence until last year and a designer of the Iraq bloodbath, is revealed as personally directing from his office in the Pentagon the torture of fellow human beings, exploiting "individual phobias, such as fear of dogs, to induce stress" and use of "a wet towel and dripping water to induce the misperception of suffocation". Cockburn's documented evidence shows that other Bush mafiosi, such as Paul Wolfowitz, now president of the World Bank, "had already agreed that Rumsfeld should approve all but the most severe options, such as the wet towel, without restriction".

In Washington, I asked Ray McGovern, formerly a senior CIA officer, what he made of Norman Mailer's remark that America had entered a pre-fascist state. "I hope he's right," he replied, "because there are others saying we are already in a fascist mode. When you see who is controlling the means of production here, when you see who is controlling the newspapers and periodicals, and the TV stations, from which most Americans take their news, and when you see how the so-called war on terror is being conducted, you begin to understand where we are headed. It's quite something that the nuclear threat today should be seen first and foremost as coming from the United States of America and Great Britain."

McGovern was the author of the president's daily CIA intelligence brief. I interviewed him more than three years ago, and his prescient words are as striking today as Cockburn's revelation of Rumsfeld's secret life is illumin ating. His description of fascism within a nominally free society recalls George Orwell's warning that totalitarianism does not require a totalitarian state.

The lies that have caused this extremely dangerous time are understood and rejected by the majority of humanity. This was illustrated vividly on 15-16 February 2003 when some 30 million people took to the streets of cities around the world, including the greatest demonstration in British history. It was illustrated again the other day in Latin America, which George W Bush on tour sought to reclaim for America's lost "backyard". "The distinguished visitor," noted one commentator in Caracas, "was received with fear and loathing."

There are many connections in Latin America to the suffering in the Middle East. The crushing of popular, reformist governments by the US and the setting up of torture regimes, from Guatemala to Chile, have echoes from Iran to Afghanistan. The current attacks on the Chávez government in Venezuela by the media, which Ray McGovern describes as being "domesticated by their wish to serve", are essential in disclaiming the right of the poor to find another way.

Elected last December with a record landslide of votes cast by three-quarters of the eligible population - his 11th major election victory - Hugo Chávez expresses the kind of genuine exuberant democracy long ago abandoned in Britain. In this country, the political class offers instead the arthritic pirouetting of Tony Blair, a criminal, and Gordon Brown, the paymaster of imperial adventures fought by 18-year-old soldiers who, on their return home, are so ill treated that there is no one to change their colostomy bag.

Chávez, having all but got rid of the deadly IMF from Latin America, dares to use the wealth from Venezuela's oil to unite the Latin peoples and to expel a foreign economic system that calls itself liberal and is the source of historic suffering. He is supported by governments and by millions across South America from whom he derives his mandate.

You would not know this on either side of the Atlantic unless you studied carefully. The propaganda that converts a lively, open democracy to an "authoritarian" dictatorship is written on the rusted crosses of Salvador Allende's comrades, of whom the same was said. It is disseminated by the embittered effete whose liberal hero was Blair, until he made an embarrassing mess, and who now claim the respectability of "the left" in order to disguise their mentoring by the likes of Wolfowitz, their promotion of Dick Cheney's ludicrous "world Islamic empire" and, above all, their passion for wars whose spilt blood is never theirs.

"Rumsfeld: his rise, fall and catastrophic legacy" by Andrew Cockburn is published in the United States by Scribner ($25)

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

9 comments from readers

GideonPolya
15 March 2007 at 23:49

Great article by John Pilger. Democracy fundamentally means rule in accordance with the WISHES OF THE PEOPLE.

In the West the overall, NETwish of the people is determined by periodic one-man-one-vote elections in various modes that variously OBFUSCATE the wishes of the people e.g. non-compulsory voting, first past the post, state-based (i.e. undemocratic) electoral college system for Presidential elections in America; non-compulsory, first past the post voting in the UK (with an undemocratic House of Lords); and compulsory, preferential voting in Australia (but undemocratic because Tasmania with 0.4 million people has the same number of Senators as Victoria with a population of 5 million people). And supervising these processes are the lying, racist, holocaust-ignoring Corporate Mainstream Media that set the agenda, twist or ignore the news and make a joke of the whole proceedings.

Thus after 10 years of evil, racist , war-mongering Bush-ite government in Australia, Mainstream Media dictate that the replacement will be the almost indistinguishable right-wing Labor that, YES, opposes the horrendous Iraq War and appalling Industrial Relations (IR) legislation BUT is committed to Australia’s alliance with the world’s #1 terrorist state (the US), the ongoing war in Afghanistan (2.4 million post-invasion excess deaths due to US Alliance war crimes) and to the Australian coal industry (Oz is the world’s biggest coal exporter; is the big country with the biggest annual per capita oil-, gas- and coal-based CO2 pollution if one includes coal exports; and is a leading Climate Criminal, threatening Bengal - population 85 million (West Bengal) plus 153 million (Bangladesh) - with Climate Genocide this century).

Another side of democracy involves satisfaction of POPULAR KEY WISHES (as opposed to the poor joke of periodic assessment of NET 2 party preferences) – e.g. surely an overwhelmingly over 99% of people want survival of their children. Thus in Communist dictatorship Cuba (I am very happy to live in Australia) this wish is granted and the “annual under-5 infant death rate” is a remarkable 0.17% (the SAME as in the US which has 40 times the annual per capita income). It can be estimated that Cuban-style medical care would save about 0.2 million under-5 infant lives annually in Latin America and that the price of US hegemony (“freedom” from Cuban-style medical services) over the last half century has been the denial of the “right to life” to about 40 million Latin American under-5 year old infants. Indeed it has been estimated that 0.12 million under-5 year old US infants have died avoidably under Bush due to Bush policies of killing Muslim kids rather than keeping American kids alive (see detailed, documented, quantitative analyses by Dr Gideon Polya on MWC News, Newsvine, Crosswire, Countercurrents, Bellaciao, Al-Jazeerah & Sulekha).

One can reasonably assume that over 99% of Iraqis want their infants to survive and a recent Occupier-conducted poll found that a simialrly overwhelming 92% of Iraqis wanted the Occupiers to leave. How have the Occupiers responded to these overwhelmingly expressed “WISHES OF THE PEOPLE”? The Occupiers refuse to leave and the “annual under-5 infant death rate” in Occupied Iraq is 2.7% or 122,000 under-5 infant deaths annually in Occupied Iraq (population 29 million) VERSUS 0.1% which translates as about 2,000 under-5 infant deaths annually in Occupier Australia (population 20 million) – noting that the “annual death rate” of Australian POWs of the Japanese in WW2 was 10% (check out UNICEF: http://www.unicef.org/index.php ). So much for “bringing democracy to Iraq”.

taghioff.info
16 March 2007 at 07:32

He doesn't like unnaccountable power.

He doesn't like illegal occupations.

He doesn't like mass death.

He doesn't like neo-conservatives, or torture.

He must be a loony, don't listen to him.

Ameen
20 March 2007 at 13:00

As eluded to by Pilger, in order for there to be a true democracy the voting public must be well informed. This certainly is not the case in the UK & US, with our biased, censored media. Long live Pilger!

gnuneo
20 March 2007 at 16:45

if only all journalists had as much genuine journalism as pilger does even in his little finger, this world would be a lot freer.

taghioff.info
27 March 2007 at 10:40

John, Nick Cohen left a message on your answering machine.

Could you call him back please? He was wondering what Democracy means.

proudlyleft
27 March 2007 at 14:12

Thank you for talking sense. Wish there were more of you. As an Indian who moved to Europe as an adult, the first thing I realised -- with a bit of a shock -- was that the 'liberal West' seems to have a particularly slanted take on almost everything that concerns the rest of the World. And this take is propagated by almost all the the 'free media' and, given the financial and discursive clout of the 'liberal West', seeps back in half-baked or oppositional versions into the rest of the World sooner or later and f...ks it up even further. Thank you again for talking sense that can be recognised as sense over the rest of the World too... at least until we get 'whitewashed' into the reactionary politics or complicit mimicry of the 'colonised' again!

lalu
07 April 2007 at 15:32

Pilger turn of phrase gives the impression that Chavez was elected last December by 3/4 of Venezuela's eligible population. Not so, he was elected by just under 50% of the eligible population.

durandal
17 August 2007 at 02:34

I'm pretty liberal, but I have to draw the line at Chavez. The guy's been changing the constitution to get rid of term limits and place the military and courts more directly under his control. His election numbers look impressive, until you find out that opposition supporters have been boycotting them. I was still prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, until he pressured the legislature to give him the power to rule by decree. He became pharoah--so let it be written, so let it be done. That was the end of Venezuelan democracy, as far as I'm concerned.

Jesuah
17 November 2007 at 15:16

These question goes to Durandal. Have you read the Venezuelan constitution? Did you know that everybody in Venezuela gets the book to read them for themself. Moreover did you know that the venezuelans will get the chance to go to a referendum to vote NO against the constitution if they please so. Do you know what democracy really stands for???

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

John Pilger

John Pilger, renowned investigative journalist and documentary film-maker, is one of only two to have twice won British journalism's top award; his documentaries have won academy awards in both the UK and the US. In a New Statesman survey of the 50 heroes of our time, Pilger came fourth behind Aung San Suu Kyi and Nelson Mandela. "John Pilger," wrote Harold Pinter, "unearths, with steely attention facts, the filthy truth. I salute him."

Read More

Vote!

Should we build new nuclear power plants?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker