The best way to react to the Kate Middleton topless photos
The parodies begin...
By Caroline Crampton Published 14 September 2012
A French magazine claims to have topless photos of the Duchess of Cambridge (formerly known to the world as Kate Middleton) although only the BBC appears to have seen them. The news will, no doubt, provoke all the usual comments about privacy and public interest whether they turn out to be genuine or not, but it has already initiated a torrent of internet searches by people wishing to see for themselves.
However, some are already hijacking this prurient curiosity about what's in the Duchess of Cambridge's bra.
With this tweet, @hornery sucked them in...
OMG - Kate's topless pix!!!! yfrog.com/hsxu4slj
— andrew hornery (@hornery) September 14, 2012
...and then presented this image:

Here's how @tokyo_sexwhale baited the searchers...
GENUINE picture of Kate Middleton topless on a beach. #katemiddleton twitpic.com/audbs3
— Tokyo Sexwhale (@tokyo_sexwhale) September 14, 2012
...So that they could look at this:

@Gideon_Osboner went with this...
Topless picture of Kate Middleton twitter.com/Gideon_Osboner…
— Giddy George Osborne (@Gideon_Osboner) September 14, 2012
And @WelshDalaiLama used a similar tactic...
EXCLUSIVE! Photo of Kate Middleton topless. twitter.com/WelshDalaiLama…
— Dai Lama (@WelshDalaiLama) September 14, 2012
The real pictures were apparently taken while Kate and William were on holiday at a relative's French chateau last week. BBC royal reporter Nicholas Witchell has been quoted as saying that British papers were offered the long lens snaps last week but turned them down.
Whether they turn out to be genuine or not, the internet searches - and the parodies - will continue to flood in...
UPDATE 14/09/2012 10:45
Michael Moran (@TheMichaelMoran) gets in touch to offer this:
You want to see the Princess Kate's tit picture? No need to thank me...... yfrog.com/nzs7gg
— Michael Moran (@TheMichaelMoran) September 14, 2012
His tit picture?
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


15 comments
You Brits can't keep your Royals covered, can you? The new title is the "Queen Bum"...
Why are there perverts with camera's as hey people in private and someone with a long tom lens and a desire to reward himself with monies for his perversion.
If he wants to be decent about it, go in a studio and photograph women whom want it that way.
Do not encourage perverts that look at peoples private functions, shine lights at night into bathroom and and peer into windows 24/7 and then have a rub-off whilst they are doing it,bedroom windows hoping to publish more than they ought.
What next topless photographs of Dave C whilst he was being happily whipped by a full clothed Goldilocks and photographed by Newt International.
Wonder what the payment National currencies were in?
Young woman has breasts - maybe first sighting in human existence -FFS.
Your own Peter Wilby said all that needs to be said about this: 'I support the decision to print photos of Prince Harry cavorting nude in Las Vegas. Those who demand privacy for royalty make a category error, like demanding human rights for cats. Members of the royal family have no role beyond providing public entertainment; apart from a certain facility with horses, they have no talents or skills to admire.' Likewose for Middleton.
Let's not go down thus road again, we had enough with Diana and Fergie. Besides which she's so thin was there anything to see?