I refuse to give up tobacco. Put that in your pipe and smoke it
By Nicholas Lezard Published 24 March 2011I am still fuming, so to speak, with the news that the government intends to ban the display of cigarettes and tobacco from all shops by 2015.
It is, in a perverse way, reassuring to know the spivs, gangsters and poltroons (from Old Italian poltrone, a coward) running this country can irritate at the micro as well as the macro level. One can also imagine how successful this idea will be. In comes the nicotine addict, desperate for his or her fix. But there are no tobacco products to be seen! He or she thinks to him or herself: "Oh dear. I might as well give up."
Then again, in my youth the massed ranks of striking, sometimes classy cigarette packets did go some way to persuading me that smoking was desirable. But I wonder if treating cigarettes as pornography used to be - sold under the counter - might not make them seem more alluring. Proper tobacconists will now, absurdly, have to have frosted windows, like pornographers, which is surely an invitation to the imaginative shop designer. In a reverie, I consider opening a tobacconist's myself, with a storefront painted to look like a tin of Ogden's Nut-brown Flake. Of course, I am channelling Ezra Pound's 1916 poem "The Lake Isle":
O GOD, O Venus, O Mercury, patron of thieves,
Give me in due time, I beseech you, a little tobacco-shop,
With the little bright boxespiled up neatly upon the shelves . . .
. . . And the whores dropping in for a word or two in passing,
For a flip word, and to tidy their hair a bit.
O God, O Venus, O Mercury, patron of thieves,
Lend me a little tobacco-shop,
or install me in any profession
Save this damn'd profession of writing,
where one needs one's brains all the time.
Younger readers will have to imagine what a tobacco-shop looks like, unless they happen to be in the neighbourhood of G Smith and Sons on Charing Cross Road. Fribourg and Treyer in the Haymarket went years ago, turned into a shop selling tourist tat; all three of Cambridge's tobacconists have gone, although the one opposite the Round Church hung on until relatively recently; it now sells sweets.
Sic transit gloria mundi, even the little ones. For solace I turn to Chris Harrald and Fletcher Watkin's splendid work, The Cigarette Book: a Celebration and Companion (Quartet, 2009), in which you will learn, among many other things, that Middleton and Dekker's The Roaring Girl (1604) features a tobacco-shop onstage, and that the cigarette lighter was co-invented by an engineer who had lost an arm in the First World War and found matches impossible.
My favourite datum, though, is from a study presented at the European Society of Cardiology in 2003, which found that 250ml of red wine countered the harm done to the arteries by each cigarette. Apparently you have to be drinking at the same time as you are smoking, which presents no problem. The authors calculate that a 40-a-day habit would entail drinking three bottles a day, "which, as anybody who has worked in the City or advertising in their heyday would acknowledge, is perfectly doable".
Penny drops in
I know, I know, it's bad for you. In some cases, very bad indeed. Please save both your time and mine by refraining from writing to remind me of this. But when loathsome people tell me to do something, my immediate inclination is to do the precise opposite. If David Cameron and his gargoyles told me to carry on, there is every likelihood that I would recoil from the habit. But something tells me this isn't going to happen. And while there is economic hardship - and something tells me this is going to be a persistent and increasingly pervasive condition - there will continue to be smokers.
Poor people smoke not only because the habit is a diversion from circumstance, but because it is also a minor act of rebellion; an indulgence, too, of the Freudian Thanatos. Saying to life, as it were: put that in your pipe and smoke it. And one thinks, too, of the cartoon showing two decrepit old men sitting in a ghastly retirement home, one of them saying to the other: "Just think, if we hadn't given up smoking, we'd have missed out on all this."
Meanwhile, there is momentous news from the Hovel. A third person will be joining myself and Emmanuelle: this magazine's very own Laurie Penny. How this will all go I cannot foretell, but she doesn't take up much space, so that's promising. She also smokes. Which I would like to think is one of the reasons she writes so well.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


20 comments
If I give up smoking I buy myself an extra 2 years pissing my pants in a care home.
Or I can suck down that gorgeous sanity saving nicotine and wait for medical science to make me immortal!!
It's a race against time I tells ya.
If the smell is the problem then everyone can have a
nosectomy. When are they going to ban Garlic ?
Smokers are not asking to smoke everywhere, but just to enjoy a cigarette with their drinks inside pubs.
Nearly everybody who approves of the smoking ban enjoy drinking. Alcohol is classed as more dangerous than tobacco, because of the violence caused by drinking.
Is it too late to start?
I'm 67 and feel I've missed out on something.
I don't drink either and I've never watched The Simpsons .
What would happen if I did all these things simultaneously?
I think it's a wise policy, because smoking has been proven to kill. The government are doing something to protect the citizens and this is a good thing- even if I'm not a Tory voter.
Seriously stop smoking people!
miles away as I an in los angeles your column brought back memories of Boddington and his tobacco shop tucked away under Leyton station assisted by his daughter Vi that is where my mum and dad got their Woodbines which they smoked as a distraction from more distressing details -- although my mum hid the fact from my dad.
@ Clara
'Seriously stop smoking people!'
I agree, smoking smoking people is bad, but the article is about tobacco.
Although we are given freedom as to whatever one chooses to do, why does it seem that it is just an illusion. Surely, us smokers, have chosen to indulge ourself in a horrible habit. We are aware of the dangers of smoking, why should we constantly have to battle with that? Smoking is not an impulse purchase. An individual does not go to the counter or walk past a tobacco counter and decide to buy a packet of cigarettes, it's an addiction, so therefore not an impulse buy. We are not interested in the design of packets, rather we are interested in what is inside. Placing cigarettes under counters will not affect buying cigarettes. I am certainly still going to buy my monthly purchase of 25g Amber Leaf. Yum!
I think we will find that a certain D Cameron has made a Pledge to Break down the Barriers to Business, so no display ban then, he can also Reform the Smoking Ban in our Pubs and Clubs so they can once again become profitable. I have to agree with this article, smoking is a lifestyle choice and no amount of bans are going to stop people from smoking, as for the tax on Legal Tobacco products maybe All products should have the same level of tax put on them,after all,everything you buy is choice. Smokers do seem to make the best writers,must be because they can stay calm as the ship sinks.
The rich will still be able to pay the increases in petrol, alcohol, tobacco products and will still be able to afford to buy their five-a-day (fruit and veg). The poorer will find it harder to pay all the increases and be able to afford their five-a-day.
Will it hurt us all? Of course not.
Post new comment