Return to: Home | Life & Society

Labour's lost inspiration

John Hayes

Published 01 November 2007

The former home of craftsman William Morris could soon be available for weddings

The status of the great craftsman and writer William Morris as a pivotal hero of the Labour movement was once taken for granted. Yet, today, the gallery dedicated to his life and work is under threat from Labour-led Waltham Forest Council, which plans to shorten the museum's opening hours. It even proposes that the former home of the author of News From Nowhere should be used as a wedding venue.

The news illustrates how far Labour has travelled from his ideals. Burdened by an obsession with the new, the party has little regard for a man who dedicated his life to the revival of traditional crafts. Morris's veneration of the past - of which he said, "it is living with us, and will be alive in the future which we are now helping to make" - sits uneasily with Tony Blair's facile characterisation of Britain as a "young country".

Morris saw all arts and crafts as "man's expression of joy in labour", and his appreciation of practical skills has enduring resonance: the past few years have seen a great revival of interest in arts and crafts. Next Saturday evening, millions of Britons will watch Strictly Come Dancing - a programme about a variety of personalities acquiring the skill of ballroom dancing through instruction and practice.

Craftsmen such as Jamie Oliver and Gordon Ramsay are feted national icons. The popularity of programmes on architecture (David Dimbleby) and engineering (the late Fred Dibnah) demonstrate our national interest in Britain's built heritage.

Yet the government appears to have a limited vision of this kind of education. Courses in traditional crafts such as cabinet-making, upholstery and silver-smithing face closure despite demand from students and employers. One million places in adult learning have been lost in the past two years due to funding cuts.

Morris would be outraged. He knew that education is about crafting a nation in which we can be proud to live. Only by valuing practical learning can we create a society where people are inspired to acquire skills throughout their lives. The weakness of Labour's approach is seen in the declining take-up and availability of work-based apprenticeships. Instead, trainees spend time in simulated work environments. No wonder nearly half of them drop out before completing the programme.

A recent high-profile advertising campaign, using painted hands to promote training, is another example of the government's failure. The ads cost £32m, but barely 9,000 people responded to their invitation to call a national skills helpline - the equivalent of £3,555 for each call.

In fact, targets for learner numbers on Train to Gain, the government's flagship training scheme, have been missed in every English region, with only 15 per cent of learners actually completing their training.

Low take-up rates mean that only £174m of the £268m allocated to the Train to Gain budget has actually been spent. This disappointing return reflects the scheme's failure to inspire. Glossy adverts will have little impact while people are discouraged by the government's failure to provide training that is either valued by employers or attractive to potential learners.

At the root of this failure is a serious underrating of crafts and skills. Those who fashion public policy - themselves usually the product of a wholly academic education - are simply failing to recognise both the sense of worth that can be derived from the acquisition of practical skills, and the nation's need for craftsmen.

Labour has forgotten what William Morris taught; he knew that education is much bigger than book-learning. The Conservatives, who share his aim of elevating the practical, are the true guardians of Morris's legacy. John Hayes is Conservative MP for South Holland and the Deepings

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

Mick Hitchin
03 November 2007 at 20:25

Having read some William Morris and a biography about him also I'd have to say he's no Keir Hardie. More a Henry Hyndeman the leader of the SDF the organisation that had a hand in founding both he Labour and Communist parties in this country and I'd have to say that Morris was an ultra left.

I lived two streets away from the museum for a nmber of years and it was pretty dull (but not as dull as the Tolpuddle Martys museum, the poorest museum I have ever visited)

The Tories can have him and his wallpaper was crap as well.

Glad Newman
05 November 2007 at 10:37

Dear Mick, The gallery may appear dull to you, but this is perhaps because the council has not invested in it for years, you've probably missed many of the wonderful exhibitions that have been on too because the council do not publicize them. Gallery's need some investment to reinterpret the exhibits regularly and to make them relevant to local people, the council have failed to do this. The Morris Gallery can be highly influential and inspiring to local people - it was highly insprirational to me as a school child visiting and always made me feel proud of the place I came from. I do hope the gallery remains open for others to feel similarly inspired.

Le Petomane
21 November 2007 at 11:38

I agree with Glad Newman. I lived in Walthamstow in the 50s and 60s, and it was a real pleaure to go to the gallery. Nobody took me there - I was just a small boy who loved looking at the paintings and designs. I haven't been there for 50 years, and am ashamed to think that a Labour Council can so blithely disregard the William Morris gallery.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker