Registered user login:

No leaders

Bonnie Greer

Published 11 October 2007

Young black Britons don't need Big Man role models like Jesse Jackson. They need local mentors - and a recognition that their British culture is valuable and unique.

I was born on the notorious West Side of Chicago. I first learned about sex not from my parents or the nuns at school, but from being kept awake at night by the gang initiations outside my bedroom window.

Each of my three brothers, in turn, had a gun pressed to his temple before he was 20. And a nephew was murdered by a gang in broad daylight on a busy street.

I have taught in schools in Brooklyn where ten-year-olds routinely made wills; and in schools in north London where boys ready for secondary school hid out to study in the reception class, so as not to become targeted as swots and eligible to suffer the fate of poor Damilola Taylor. Gangs and gang-bangers have been part of my life, all of my life.

Now, in early 21st-century Britain, black gang culture has finally emerged into mainstream consciousness. Proposed solutions range from the encouragement of "fathering" to the need for a national leader. Yet the rise of black gang culture also presents us with the opportunity to examine other ways of addressing not only this phenomenon, but black life in general.

The classic approach uses the languages of sociology, politics, religion or psychology. This is no longer enough to describe either the new generation that makes up the gangs or the black community in general. It is time to take the language, the thinking behind theoretical science and maths and add them, along with culture, to the mix.

This is necessary because of two factors.

The first is that, in London - where almost half of the black population lives - close to 50 per cent of children under the age of five have one non-white parent. These young people will, in time, present a definition of themselves that the old paradigms cannot contain on their own.

The second factor is the rise of new technology and the intense interface our young people have with it, creating a different kind of consciousness that is sweeping all before it.

October is designated Black History Month, but very soon it will be the familiar definitions that will become history.

The Atlantic model

Too often, America - the Atlantic model - is cited in policymaking for black Britain. Aside from our similar racial origins, however, black America and black Britain have less in common than meets the eye.

Black America is largely monolithic and our roots tend to be Southern Baptist and rural. We have roughly the same accent as a result of segregation and its consequent restriction of movement. We have lived continuously on American soil, most of that time in slavery, for more than half a millennium. (These, by the way, are some of the elements that make Barack Obama seem alien to many black Americans.)

Black Britain, on the other hand, is international. It is urban. It has no rural history in this country. Within the living experience and memory of all black Britons are other countries, other cultures. And ironically, because of the impact of biraciality, the term "black" may not define black Britain in the future at all.

Therefore, black Britain should concentrate on life as lived here. This concentration can develop a model for the rest of the world as urbanisation spreads.

Following the recent visit of Jesse Jackson to the UK, the Guardian lamented that black Britain had not, as yet, created a similar leader of equi valent power and influence. I congratulate black Britain on its failure to achieve this. Here, the "Big Man" model of a Jackson or a Farrakhan cannot be the answer. "No Leader" would be more particular to this country.

"No Leader" centres on the local level. It champions the hard-working, "get on with it" ethos of people such as Sidney McFarlane MBE, who works tirelessly in Lincoln through local charities and makes a difference. There are many, many black people like him. They walk the talk. "No Leader" responds to the people, is creative and adaptable. "No Leader" relies on mentoring. It is, for example, about young people working with young people. Its relationships are lateral. No one looks up. No one looks down. There is only "us" and "we".

Although poverty, racism and deprivation are some of the conditions in which gangs develop, they also are created through and nurtured through the sophisticated use of social networking sites, mobile phones and other rapidly developing technologies.

Because of this, we now live in a divide. We inhabit a kind of pre-Gutenberg/Gutenberg universe in which mathematical constructs such as Moore's Law, which describes the rate of change in a computer component, may be used, in years to come, as a means of looking at the waves of gang violence - and even at the growth of gangs.

In a recent article in the New York Times, Henry Jenkins, a director of comparative media studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was quoted as saying: "The rate of change is so intense that the expertise you have as a nine-year-old may be obsolete by the time that you're 12 or 13. You [adults] need to keep an eye on the kindergartener who knows what you don't know."

For the first time in history, the young and the very young will have to sit at the high tables of policymaking. We adults will have to learn their language, enter their world. There will be no universals, no absolutes.

Culture will become a crucial feedback system across the technology chasm as well as a transmitter of the values we wish to conserve and pass on. This last will be culture's main and crucial purpose.

All of this will happen on the "atomic" level. Big, fat, top-down social programmes will roll over and die as microprogrammes target and pinpoint areas of concern and need.

Not just victims

The black American designer and long-time London resident Kevin Spellman has an interest in atomisation in relation to the black community. He has worked on urban projects in Lewi sham, south-east London. And, from his interest in various ideas contained in chaos and other theories, he has designed a concept he calls "holarchy". For him, "small is beautiful".

"What interests me is the different approaches towards fostering creativity in black areas," says Spellman. "Perhaps we should concentrate more on a bottom-up approach which centres on creativity, instead of top-down, which tends to be an economic approach. There are many questions to ask regarding how, for instance, creativity interfaces with economics and ethnicity. We should look deeper into this."

Paul Goodwin, urban research fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, is developing what he calls "black urbanism", which looks at how black people actually live in cities. He believes that the study, from a positive point of view, of the way we reconfigure cities is very important in understanding the dynamic of urban centres where black people live.

"Black people and immigrants have created their own urban worlds; there is no single experience of city life. Until now the concept of the 'ghetto' has limited our understanding of not only how these spaces are produced, but also how or what they represent and signify," Goodwin says. "A shift of understanding is not just academic or conceptual - it has major imp lications for the way we deal with 'black', immigrant or 'ghetto' spaces in terms of policy and intervention.

"Studies of discrimination and 'urban disadvantage' do not cover the totality of the black urban experience," he says. "Black people are not just victims. Histories of community-building, the making and remaking of cultures, art and creative practices, the construction and deconstruction of urban landscapes, and their relationship to black and migrant urban communities, all need to be addressed by urbanists and planners today. Black and immigrant communities have contributed much to the current vibrancy of British cities and need to be central to any inner-city urban regeneration efforts."

Black urbanism is not only an understanding of urban culture and experience from a black perspective - it also requires the active involvement of us, the black communities in cities and neighbourhoods all across the UK. Black communities should be more engaged in the process of designing and creating the very neighbourhoods and spaces of the metropolitan areas they have done so much to help revive over the past half-century. Black urbanites, and the expressive "dissident" cultures they help produce, must be seen as active participants and innovators in the production of urban spaces - not just as passive victims of urban decay or a "culture of poverty".

The black middle class is the one segment of the black community that is largely ignored. It is a community whose stories and points of view are seldom heard, whose images we hardly see. They are the disappeared of black Britain.

The writer and broadcaster Zina Saro-Wiwa believes that too much attention is paid to black pathology and not enough to other stories, other lives. "The middle class is the real cause for hope," she says. "The recent publi cation of a black power list, with a broadening of black success stories from sports, music and politics, was refreshing - but not refreshing enough. Very few people, of whatever colour, become QCs, government ministers - or, indeed, multimillionaires. Many more black people are middle class. We need to break this paradigm of extremes: of either hoodies or pol iticians. We need to normalise black success."

And normalise our perception of Africa. One way of helping our young people, instilling in them more pride, more concern for the community and more hope for the future, is to refocus our reporting of Africa.

Good news

I will forever be grateful to my parents and teachers for presenting to me an Africa that was other than the land of spear-waving, screaming crazies depicted by the media when I was a child. Besides the Darfurs, the Sierra Leones and Zimbabwes, we need more good news about Africa.

Because it does exist.

For example, Africa has the world's second- fastest-growing local stock market; Kenya is a leader in the advanced use of mobile-phone technology for bespoke medical care. The Africa that will show its face on the new rolling news station A24 will be not only an Africa of wars and poverty, but an Africa of culture, of universities, of good governance and health care.

The journalist Onyekachi Wambu, who is also information officer at the African Foundation for Development, is passionate about linking up the African diaspora with the continent."Eight million new people come on to the job market every year in sub-Saharan Africa," he says. "Finding suitable jobs for these people should be the focus of any genuine poverty-reducing strategy, not all that stuff about aid. Africa is going through an incredible period of activity and business optimism. Had you stuck £1m in 2003 in the ten leading stocks on the Nigerian stock exchange, you would have walked away last year with £1m in profit. I am optimistic about Africa's future and how the diaspora can plug in to transforming Africa."

Black Britain can help define the 21st century in this country and in the world. We just need to open all the windows in the house.

Bonnie Greer, Paul Goodwin, Kevin Spellman and others will be at the RSA, 8 John Adam Street, London WC2, on 18 October at 6pm

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

11 comments from readers

ikotubo
11 October 2007 at 13:19

There are a couple of issues I disagree with in this piece, but they matter less in comparison with what I agree with: the author(s)' rejection of the Jessee Jacksons of this world as the panacea to the problems of black people. To begin with, these are always self-appointed (and by definition, unrepresentative) self-serving "leaders" who literally earn their living highlighting black deprivation. In other words, they have a vested interest in perpetuating black misery, because without it, they become irrelevant. This is why they very seldom preach individual responsibility. The black man, in their worldview, is somehow, always owed something by someone, somewhere, no matter what.

And they have extended the same attitude towards the worst of Africa's kleptocratic tyrants, who, to them, are victims of the World Bank and WTO. The fact that these rulers routinely loot their treasuries is immaterial. Neither does it matter that their conduct has resulted in the deaths of millions of black people in Africa. Crimes against black people only matter if committed by white people, it seems.

Matthew A. Sawtell
11 October 2007 at 20:55

To be blunt - Jesse Jackson could not hold Martin Luther King's Bible any more than Louis Farrakhan could hold Malcolm X's Koran. When I see Jackson and/or Farrakhan on the television in Detroit and Chicago, it feels like watching a couple of used car dealers peddling lemons.

King and X, along with other the good men and women of history, expoused to all communities of the world the need for self empowerment. If nothing else, maybe it is time to stop watching the salesmen on television and rediscover the words of men who paid for their actions in cold blood.

Douglas Chalmers
12 October 2007 at 04:33

Frankly, the English don't want anyone to show them up for what they really are - and that hasn't changed since the execution of Britain's last legitimate monarch, Mary queen of Scots.

Having a Martin Luther King or a Malcolm X would show them the way to "the mountain" and that is a path which the English have repudiated again and again. Mediocrity, hypocrisy and all it entails and all that ensues are the white Englishman's lot.

Mike
12 October 2007 at 16:24

I'm always appalled when reading such ignorant responses regarding the crisis in Black society as all of those posted before this one.

I remember well the comments and attitudes -- from within and without the Black community -- regarding Martin King and Malcolm. Most African Americans, even those church-going, fed-up-with-racism Black folks, were not on his bandwagon when he pushed his passive resistance crusade. Many of them thought he was egotistical, self-serving and downright pompous. As for Malcolm, the average Black person saw him as something to be feared because of his Muslim beliefs. And most Whites, American Whites anyway, genuinely hated them both. Remember Bull Conner, fire hoses, COINTELPRO, the "60 Minutes" exclusive on Black Muslims and assassins' bullets for both?

Thus, the disdain for King and Malcolm is merely being played out all over again against Jesse and Farrakhan. Black leaders are never revered until they're dead. If you thing I'm just babbling, I dare you to name a single Black leader you admire who is outspoken about White Supremacy and bigotry and government oppression of Black people the same way that King and Malcolm spoke out. Are not Jesse and Farrakahn's messages the same?

What a foolish argument, Bonnie Greer, to say that Britons don't need messengers like Jesse Jackson. You correctly state that local mentors are necessary, but Black society needs positive messages from as many sources as possible.

ikotubo
12 October 2007 at 16:26

To Douglas Chalmers: Obviously, your comments are made in good faith, but as a black man, I find them quite patronizing (and even racist). Why does the white man (or indeed, anyone else) need to be "shown the way to the mountain" vis-a-vis the black man? Don't you believe that black people are CAPABLE of taking their future in their hands - like the Asians, the Chinese, the Jews, etc?

ikotubo
12 October 2007 at 16:45

To Mike: Your attempt to compare Jackson/Farrakhan and Martin Luther King is rather specious and fails to recognize a basic differences between them. For example, at no time did King ever encourage my fellow black people to celebrate our supposed victimhood so he could remain a "black leader," as Farrakhan and Jackson have. On the contrary, his entire campaign was against those who sought to place obstacles in our path to economic and social self-emancipation. Indeed, although he is universally known as a "black" civil rights campaigner, he also fought for white emancipation (particularly from exploitative employers).

Moreover, if King had not been murdered, I believe that his attitude to African tyrants and kleptocrats would have been quite different from those of Farrakhan and Jackson, if only because he would almost certainly have been appalled by the unnecessary suffering and deaths caused by these rulers to fellow black people. He certainly would not have befriended, indulged or defended them as Farrakhan and Jackson have done over the years.

Carl Jones
12 October 2007 at 21:55

ikotubo, its not "patronizing". I`ve lived and worked in London since 1984, as I`ve got older. I have realised and to some degree the mechanisms which are used to maintain the status quo. We know that social mobility has decreased since the 2nd WW...the idea that many "WHITE" folk find it hard, if not impossible to get on in life. Illustrates the plight (and I`m not using the word lightly) of many ethnic groups to get on. I live and work with these people, I`m white....God help them!

To use an analogy; the gap between male/female pay...it exists and is forecast to remain for decades. Are you telling me that ethnic groups are better placed...I think not.

The Rev. Jackson is nothing but a body filler. He provides no serious threat to the establishment, so he remains.

In South Africa there is a new black elite, who are becoming seriously wealthy. They are as bad as the apartheid whites...you are black and read the Newstatesman...as this point I`d like to know the ethnic breakdown of Newstatesman subscribers....but I`ll stick my neck out and state that you are in a minority well beyond Britain`s ethnic makeup...is this why you hold your opinion?

ikotubo
13 October 2007 at 09:30

To Carl Jones: Thanks for responding to my post. Quite ironically, you seem to be making my point more eloquently than I was able to at first. Yes, there is marginalization of all sorts in society. Indeed, it would be a great surprise (even astonishing) if this wasn't the case. And the reasons are as many as those who profer them. Some are "institutional," others are not. But then, isn't life itself "a struggle"? As it happens, no one understands this basic fact of life better than the poor, working class, black people who live in deprived areas such as Harlesden and Tottenham (both in London, by the way). I know these places well because I grew up there.

My point is that liberal commentators should stop encouraging this dangerously fatalistic (and yes, patronizing and racist) attitude in regard to my community - the supposition that someone, somewhere, must somehow be responsible for our own economic and social emancipation. This dangerous ideology has been allowed to permeate every aspect of our lives for too long, and has invariably encouraged many of us to accept the status quo as a fait accompli. The result is that while the Indians, the Chinese, the Japanese, the Jews, and now, the new migrants from Eastern Europe are expected to succeed in spite of life's numerous obstacles, black kids are encouraged to always expect help of some kind. How can this not be patronizing, racist and dangerous?

And if you seriously think I'm in the minority, this is also racist and patronizing, because the implication is that the majority of my people are genetically incapable of having legitimate aspirations like everyone else.

Carl Jones
13 October 2007 at 19:46

Thankyou ikotubo for the last paragraph, as its full of lies....I pointed out that you subscribe to the Newstatesman....it is clear that by reading your original post, my reply to it and the above response, you do not want to be associated with any minority, because you feel you have "arrived" and just because you made it, sod the rest!

You go on to mention India and China....India is the most racist nation on Earth....but wot the heck, they are all the same colour....and only a minorty of Chinese have experienced the coastal boom....which in effect is just a "work camp". They are not expected to succeed...this is just a NWO globalisation myth....do you really believe that India and China can increase 10/15 fold....can this Earth sustaine another 3 Amerikas and 3 more Europes? You are deluding yourself.

And your biggest mistake is your assertion that "black kids expect help of some kind"....what help are you on about....there are about (guestimate) 100,000 black boys who lopped around London`s streets last week and they will do the same next week....do you read the news? Gangs, drugs and gun and knife crime, this not only blights London, but many cities and towns. The media loves to latch onto some black kid who lived in the hood, but got out and made something of their life....very much a minority!

Anf if you think I`m just going use Black kids as an example, you are wrong. The British education system is largely responsible for the lack of social mobility. Schools quickly identify childern from professinal/ teacher families and they get most of the teachers time. I heard this weeks Desert Island Discs...Alan Johnson Health Sec.....one that got through the net, but the MSM still labled him as un-educated, but dropped it before the social mobility scam re-surfaced.

You should run for US president, you believe in a system which perpetuates the most dysfunctional society on Earth...go now before you make our own system poorer than it already is.

ikotubo
13 October 2007 at 20:39

To Carl Jones: I always thought there was a difference between India or China (the country) and British residents/citizens who happen to be of Indian or Chinese origin. But never mind.

And at no time did I state that "black kids expect help of some kind" either. On the contrary, my point was that they have for too long been ENCOURAGED by people like you to rely on some kind of assistance, because you and your ilk don't believe that black people are genetically capable of achieving very much on their own beyond "lopping around London" - whatever this means.

DOREIKO
13 October 2007 at 21:42

The problem with young black people in Britain today , I believe stems from the lack of father figures in the home. It is said that by the time a boy reaches the age of eight ,his dad should begin to have a significant imput in his life.

A girl also needs her dad being the first man in her life to guide her as from a male perspective.

There is a fragmentation of the black family in Britain. However, this is not a problem here only. It is also seen in the Caribbean where there is also a problem with young black people.

In the absence of goog father figures, positive male role models and mentors are needed

Young black males must be taught to respect women which is lacking in black adult males. Actually, the young people in many respects are just following the behaviour they see in the adults.

This is something which is self perpetuating.

In the next few years , these young people would be parents. What can they teach to their children?

A lot of black parents do not teach anything positive to their children through example.

We, as black people must stop blaming everyone for our circumstances .We point fingers all the time. It is time for our fingers to be turned inwards, then we would rise up and face our challenges with determination and bring about positive changes in our society.,

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Does Hillary Clinton deserve to be secretary of state?