Return to: Home | Life & Society

Stop demonising children

Martin Narey

Published 19 April 2007

Barnardo's chief executive Martin Narey attacks the way we portray children saying we risk demonising them

There seems to be a general acceptance that today’s young people are a more unruly, criminal lot than ever before. The media feed us a constant stream of negative images: young people in hoodies lurking on street corners, ‘thugs’, ‘louts’ and ‘yobbos’ running amok in our communities.

We know this is an exaggerated picture, but it is hard not to be influenced. It can lead to knee-jerk political responses, such as slapping ASBOs on children as young as ten. It has almost certainly contributed to the eightfold rise in the use of custody for children aged 10-15 years that has occurred since 1990.

The reality is of course more complex than media images or political rhetoric suggest.

Children are far more likely to be the victims of crime than its perpetrators. They are responsible for just 12% of crime and youth crime has been falling since 1992. Yet we lock up more children than almost any other European country – four times as many as France - and our age of criminal responsibility is one of the lowest, at 10 years.

Set against the alarming stories of youth misdemeanours and crime, are a battery of positive statistics pumped out by the Government, about how young people are achieving better than ever before – gaining good exam results, continuing to university, driving growth in high skills sectors of the economy. We have only to look around us to observe the greater material wealth of the I-POD generation.

But this creates new pressures and a widening gap between the affluent majority and those who grow up in poverty. Nearly one in three children in the UK - 3.8 million – live in poverty. Despite significant investment by the Government, last year child poverty rates rose for the first time in six years. The likelihood of remaining in poverty for those born into poverty has actually increased.

This matters hugely because poverty blights children’s life-chances. It goes hand-in-hand with a multitude of risk factors - family breakdown, neglect and abuse, poor housing, poor health, educational underachievement, truancy and exclusion and yes, crime.

Political and media discourse seldom tell the whole story. Children are portrayed either as innocent victims of their circumstances or, to use the disgraceful but popular stereotype, as ‘feral youth’. As Chief Executive of Barnardo’s and formerly Head of the Prison Service, I know that all too often those young children born into poverty and subjected to abuse or neglect grow up to be the delinquent teenagers we lock up in the secure estate.

Demonising children may make good copy (I have my doubts) but it does not make for good policy. So what is needed?

A concerted effort to end child poverty, reaching out to the most disadvantaged families.

Investment in early years and parenting support, building on the successes of Sure Start.

Intervening early when things go wrong, rather than waiting until crisis point is reached - for example, extending the holistic, preventive support offered by Youth Offending Teams, rather than issuing ever more ASBOs.

Most of all, we must never give up on a child. Even if a young person has to go to prison for committing a serious crime, we need to use that episode to get to the root of their difficulties and enable them to change their life for the better.

Children are our future. We can either support them to grow into responsible citizens and valued members of the community or we can reinforce their disadvantage by ridiculing them in the media, expelling them from school and locking them up - pushing them further to the margins, when they most need our help.

The choice is obvious. There is an urgent moral and economic case to invest in children now. Just as importantly, we need to start believing in them.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

Nick Gulliford
20 April 2007 at 06:00

Martin Narey says, "..... poverty blights children’s life-chances. It goes hand-in-hand with a multitude of risk factors - family breakdown, neglect and abuse, poor housing, poor health, educational underachievement, truancy and exclusion and yes, crime."

The ONS publishes data about all the above deprivation indicators, but not 'family breakdown',

Martin Narey talks about, "Investment in early years and parenting support, building on the successes of Sure Start."

What about building on the success of marriage?

The debate about family life always seems to leave out any consideration of the institution that is most successful in socialising children and is given the least encouragement and support.

DCarins
20 April 2007 at 10:19

Marriage is rubbish. For every tale of how wonderful marriage is in "socialising children" (oh what a beautiful conceit that is...) there is a tale of a disgruntled husband, a suicidal wife, a miserable child forced to endure her parents' arguments and the ensuing retribution...

It's only a lousy piece of paper and an excuse to massage your own vanity by showing how rich and popular you are. Other than that, utter bollocks. Sure, the people whose marriages survive are probably more decent, more responsible and less selfish - and are therefore more likely to be better parents. In other words, it's the people, not the marriage, that is probably the key.

sonicdeathmonkey
20 April 2007 at 20:07

I'm married and I agree with DCarins. Marriage is not the answer to child poverty, if you think that then you need to consider de-Cameronising yourself and stepping back into the real world. The best thing Labour have done is pour money into the NHS and SureStart, both of these will cease the very second Cameron enters 10 Downing St.

Blair may be delusional and Brown may be a Machiavellian, nucular-warrior-sociopath but either is preferable to Cameron.

I just re-read that last paragraph and remembered why I want to leave this country ASAP.

SDM

asturiana
22 April 2007 at 00:57

well keep away from me, move somewhere else where you can fool yourself that misunderstanding the languange and cultural mores makes you somehow more acceptable and accommodating of Johnnie Foreigner in his or her own environment. I expect they will wish you further. Try Siberia.

IrritatedofTonbridge
23 April 2007 at 16:52

Let's face it children are essentially animals that need training and if they are not trained then that's their parents fault. I agree with Martin that we are bombarded with images in the media that promote a negative view of kids. The trouble is that kids play up to this bad image and can graduate to actually becoming bad: carrying knives, hanging around with the deliberate aim of intimidating. The victims of this unruly behaviour are often other children but equally they are the older people who live on dodgy estates, trapped by their poverty and trapped in their homes by aggressive teenagers. I'm sympathetic to the child victims but there are plenty of adult victims too who daren't even report their plight.

gnuneo
25 April 2007 at 00:53

after living in scandinavia for 5 years, where the society did not go the way of Thatcher's "There is no society" terrible claim, the societies there have invested in their children, made schools and education more attractive (by getting the students input, not centrallised public school educated beaurocrats ideas about education), allowed the new generations their own space to build and create (skate-parks etc), not only prevented parental violence but (possibly more important) gave training in being good parents, not beleiving that "parenting is natural" - in the human it is not.

the result is that although their youth are also experiencing a very turbulent world and are also more 'anti-social', it is no where NEAR the same level as the UK.

Odd, that.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker