Registered user login:

The most despicable character ever written

Simon Kelner

Published 08 January 2007

It seems that any group of activists can get their mates to email the BBC, and the corporation will oblige them with terrified self-censorship

Here's a story about the craven editorial judgements of the post-Hutton BBC that in its own small way is shocking. A month ago, I spent a long evening recording a programme which the producer said, in true Alan Partridge style, was to be "the jewel in the crown" of Radio 5 Live's Christmas schedule. It was a knockabout current affairs show called Fighting Talk in which two comedians and two serious media figures, including myself and Kelvin MacKenzie (you can decide which category we fell into), discussed the year's events. I quickly realised I had misjudged the tone. The first topic was Iraq. The floor was mine. I gave a measured answer in the manner of the Today programme. Kelvin was next up. "I think we should turn it into a big Ikea," he blustered. "It's got four letters, it begins with I, there's plenty of room for parking, and the only problem is that as soon as you start putting the country together again, there'll always be a piece missing."

It would not have had Lord Reith bursting with pride, but thanks largely to Kelvin's well-practised controversialism, it was a mildly diverting hour of radio. It was scheduled for 7pm on Christmas Eve and was heavily trailed in the preceding days. I switched on at the appointed time. But instead of Kelvin's reflections on global warming - can you believe he thinks it's all exaggerated? - we got a lame, supposedly comic, programme about Premiership footballers and their wives. There was no announcement that the schedule had been altered, even less an explanation of why the nation was to be deprived of my witty aperçus on Patricia Hewitt.

I texted Richard Bacon, the presenter. He replied thus: "After Kelvin's inflammatory comments about Hillsborough, 5 Live received a petition of 700 signatories asking for him not to be put on air." He had that week defended his well-known opinion that the Hillsborough disaster was caused by Liverpool fans, but it's not as if this subject was even discussed on our programme. Kelvin may have unfortunate views in a number of areas, Hillsborough being one of them, but who's to say he doesn't have a right to air them? It seems that any group of activists can get their mates to email the BBC, and the corporation will oblige them with terrified self-censorship. I'm now thinking of doing the same next time I hear that Sir Andrew Green, with his repellent views on immigration, is slated to appear on Today. Or David Irving. How ironic that the BBC has turned Kelvin MacKenzie into a martyr. Free the Hillsborough One!

Studied insouciance

I once sat next to Bill Clinton at lunch; I have met Nelson Mandela; and Bono took my chair to guest edit the Independent last year. We editors lead privileged lives, and it's easy to become blasé about encountering the powerful and famous. But on Christmas Day, I had to put any studied insouciance aside when I met my comic hero, Larry David, creator of Seinfeld and star of the peerless Curb Your Enthusiasm. David, at the age of 59, was making his first visit to Britain and was having Christmas lunch with a friend of mine. In Curb Your Enthusiasm, he plays a hapless curmudgeon whose habit of speaking his mind turns the most promising situation into, as he would say, a great big bowl of wrong. David has said this is the man he would like to be in real life.

Disappointingly, he was charm itself. We discussed our interest in golf, but he couldn't be tempted ("no Jewish man plays golf in temperatures less than 60°F"). He agreed to phone a message to my duty editor ("I see your Jewboy boss has got you working on Christmas Day") and posed for a picture with my dog. Sometimes you shouldn't meet your heroes, I thought. As I left, he told me he's going to write into the series he's filming someone called Kelner. As I pondered my comic immortality, he called after me: "He's going to be the most despicable character I've ever written."

Justice for some

On the same day that Saddam Hussein, who grossly exaggerated the weapons capacity of Iraq, was executed, John Scarlett, who also exaggerated the weapons capacity of Iraq, was knighted. How dare they talk about victor's justice.

Simon Kelner is editor of the Independent

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

15 comments from readers

Correspondent
05 January 2007 at 21:31

Simon Kelner's view of the BBC's decision to re-schedule the 5Live programme with himself & Kelvin MacKenzie as "self-censorship" fails to take into account the outrage that greeted the repeating of MacKenzie's Hillsborough comments last month. Many people, not just on Merseyside, were aghast that the BBC could employ the services of a man who has made a career from macho bullying, venal propaganda & pandering to prejudice. Mr. Kelner also quotes Richard Bacon as saying that the petition against MacKenzie attracted 700 signatures. The online petition I presume he is referring to (http://www.petitiononline.com/rawk1/petition.html ) actually attracted over 10,000 signatories.

Jim McCabe,

Bootle, Merseyside.

GerryO
07 January 2007 at 00:52

It seems the name-dropping Mr Kelner has been keeping company with Kelvin MacKenzie for too long and forgotten to check his facts before opening his mouth.

Symesy
07 January 2007 at 07:34

Free the Hillsborough One?No chance. MacKenzie stands by his opinions (which he should have kept to himself btw, not printed in a national paper and keep dragging them up 17 years down the line) and for this, he will be forever a hated, vile figure amongst those which he slated. A right to air his views? Not a chance in hell. You live by the sword, you die by the sword. And Mr Kelner, the petition was over 11,000 signatures, not 700

Karen Hill
07 January 2007 at 08:27

I am aghast and Simon Kelner's article, he has totaly failed to grasp the reason why over 11,000 people signed a petition regarding kelvin Mackenzie's proposed broadcast on Xmas day ! Kelner seems more put out that he himself was unable to grace the airwaves what an ego! What Mackenzie said 17yrs ago was bad enough but to wait 17yrs later and use it to court publicity for his latest business venture on the dinner circuit is nothing less than dispicable!You may not have Morals Mr Kelner but your listners do and if you can not appreciate that then maybe you need to re access your own values before judging others!

Graham McCann
08 January 2007 at 15:55

Although I take Mr Kelner's concerns about the BBC's self-belief post-Hutton, he has chosen a spectacularly poor example with which to shame the Corporation into keeping a stronger grip on its proper convictions. Kelvin Mackenzie's comments about the Hillsborough tragedy are not the expression of any brave claim to truth, honesty or journalistic integrity. They are lies, plain and simple, which cause immense hurt to those of us who have lost innocent friends and family. Who will be next to receive public support from Mr Kelner - David Irving?

jonesy
08 January 2007 at 18:45

Simon

I didn't see the category listed that you and Kelvin "fell into" - two idiots.

jonesy


09 January 2007 at 16:18

"who's to say he doesnt have the right to air them?" (Makenzie's views) He can air them, hilter also aired hi, Saddam aired his, but the public dont want them on national radio at Xmas !!!!

Fact is he courted controversy to get publicity and in doing spat on the grves of the 96, and insulted their families...no, Im not a Liverpudlian, if that's what you think, just a human being who believes the dead should not be "pissed on and robbed" by Makenzie 17 years on

NigelKavanagh
09 January 2007 at 19:17

If Mr Kelner can persuade 11,000 oh his mates to send a petiton to the BBC and maybe get another 40,000 to take part in a demonstration, well than maybe Radio 5 will invite him and his co-presenter Kelvin MacKenzie back next year.


10 January 2007 at 14:05

what an extremely ignorant and silly man you are. It's amazing how someone so devoid of the ability to gather the facts before putting your vacuous thoughts into print is able to rise to the position of Editor. Sums up what is wrong with society today IMO.

debbie
11 January 2007 at 00:02

It seems that Mckenzie is not the only one who lies and doesn't tell the truth. I hope you both rot in hell. Lying bastards.


11 January 2007 at 00:07

What a disgusting little member of the chattering classes.

I think "Hello" offers a better standard of left-leaniing comment than this piffle. Utterly shameful.


11 January 2007 at 00:52

Yes Simon it is a disgrace. They should be expanding the amount of license payer’s money expended on fabricators and fantasists like Irvine and Mackenzie not reducing it. The airwaves should be filled with demonstrably false statements masquerading as opinion. I for instance look forward to a long series dealing with your fathers’ unfortunate necrophilia fetish. It may cause you a certain amount of pain and bear no relation to the facts but we cannot censor the BBC can we?

Greenockian
11 January 2007 at 18:45

God I think this is the most depressing thing I have ever had to do and I lived as a voter all through Thatcher's years. Kelvin McKenzie is not a harmless wind up merchant. He and his paper worked tirelessly to undermine the social structures and collective strength of the working class to attain and keep her Viciousness in power. Now he recants a recantation (which frankly he did because he was a running dog lackie (sorry I know that is not an acceptable term anymore in your New Labour New Statesman) to save his job). But now shiftless and unemployed he seeks to make a career amongst the seven course meal, cigars, cognac and you'll never get a chick doing my job brigade and you publish an article supporting him on the grounds of free speech. When will the the people who suffered get as big a voice as this maniac. I know they won't just as I know you won't investigate what actually happened, what it meant for the families of the deceased (football fan's for buck sake whose gonna advertise with us if they start reading this) and you won't interview the Liverpool taxi driver he famously encountered in his after dinner speech. I only make these points because there was a time when you would've done. At least have the decency to call yourself The New New Statesman and then we all know where we stand.

Disappointed of Greenock

nottsgriff
12 January 2007 at 00:09

Simon, I always bought the New Statesman until I read this. Not any more I'm afraid. Kelvin MacKenzie, one day after 96 innocent people were killed at Hillsborough, claimed that fellow fans urinated on the dead and robbed their pockets, under a giant headline on the front page reading "THE TRUTH". He has since said that he stands by his claims and wished he'd never apologised.

I never thought I would see the day when a magazine like the New Statesman would spring to the defence of this sort of statement. You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself. This is not a case of a rent-a-mob stopping people they disagree with, it is a case of genuniely hurt and aggreived people registering their disgust at someone that the journalistic world seems to laud for slandering and abusing the dead working classes.

Shame on you, and your magazine by association.

Gareth Griffiths,

Nottingham, England

johnlemmon
12 February 2007 at 09:21

from Australia, I am a Hillsborough survivor...

For you "special breed" of liars and headline seeking lags, let me tell you that we would love that Billy Liar MacKenzie, to visit Liverpool, indeed Anfield where we will make sure that he gets the only welcome he will ever truly deserve...

As I am sure he will read this magazine I am equally sure he never reads the filthy rag he represents as it doesn't actually have any news in it...

If it smells like sh*t, then it probably is sh*t...!!!

Peter...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?