Registered user login:

The Met's closed culture

Brian Paddick

Published 06 October 2008

From the ground floor up, much of the police culture focuses around informal networks and off-duty socialising which excludes gay and ethnic minority officers, writes ex-top cop Brian Paddick

Most of the allegations of racism made by Britain’s most senior Muslim police officer Tarique Ghaffur are against Sir Ian Blair, so one might have hoped for a more positive response from the Black Police Association (BPA) to the Met Commissioner’s demise.

Instead, the BPA have announced a boycott of Met police recruitment drives aimed at black and minority ethnic communities because the BPA still believes the Met has “a hostile atmosphere”.

Sir Ian Blair, who previously described himself as “a bit of a limpet” exhibited some very un-gastropod qualities last week, jumping ship with the help of a gentle shove from Boris Johnson on the day the London Mayor took over as chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority.

Only a vote by the twenty-three member MPA can result in a recommendation to the Home Secretary that the Commissioner resign and she alone has the power to enforce it.

The consequence of the home secretary’s failure to dissuade Blair from resigning appears to hand the London Mayor the power to fire Britain’s top cop at will.

She may have had her reasons, mind you. There were the hotly contested allegations about contracts being given to a company owned by Blair's friend and skiing partner.

And don't forget the ongoing inquest into the shooting by police of the innocent Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes.

Letting Blair go may have been enticing in the short term but it may prove to be a decision she and her successors will live to regret down the line.

In Monday night’s BBC Panorama programme, ‘The Secret Policeman Returns’, Mike Fuller, the country’s only black Chief Constable talks about how minority ethnic officers find it hard to get put forward for selection.

In justifying their action against the Met, the BPA talk about a recent promotion selection process where none of the 70 successful applicants were black, a situation that has persisted over the past three years.

Retiring as the most senior openly gay police officer in the UK, I had been lucky. I was able to keep my ‘difference’ a secret from my colleagues, at least initially and even when the rumours started, the Met’s promotion procedures during crucial periods of my own career were scrupulously fair.

They involved assessment centres involving a series of different people assessing the same candidate and ‘blind marking’ of written papers.

Such objective assessment has since been abandoned by the Met to be replaced by far more emphasis being placed on what your boss thinks of you, allowing the potential for subjectivity and discrimination.

From the ground floor up, much of the police culture focuses around informal networks, off-duty socialising and informal horse-trading.

Whether it is the team of street cops going to the pub after work - a place where many Muslim and Sikh officers feel uncomfortable - or senior officers thrashing out deals in the wine bars and restaurants around New Scotland Yard, as Fuller puts it: “If you’re not a member of the club…then you can find yourself excluded.”

Tarique Ghaffur and I would sometimes sit in his office bemoaning the fact that ‘they’ did not understand ‘us’, senior officers who were ‘different’. We felt that we were not being listened to, excluded as we were from the informal networks.

As a result, the only way we could get our point across was to go public, whether it was my proposals for a more lenient approach to cannabis or Ghaffur’s belief his department was being starved of cash.

While we were branded as ‘rebels’, it was the direct consequence of the exclusion we felt, the result of a culture that favours the straight white male and the exclusive circles he moves in.

Brian Paddick was Britain's most senior gay policeman rising to deputy assistant commissioner in the Met. He was also the Lib Dem candidate in this year's London mayoral race

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

Carl Jones
06 October 2008 at 16:29

Brian, while race and gay rights are important issues in the police. The Freemasonary is by far the biggest blight affecting the police.

Before Blair came to power, he pledged to make it a requirement that all public employees and elected officials would be required to disclose any ties with organisations such as the masons.

The other major problem is that the line between MI5 and the police has become so blurred. The Menezes assassination had British soldiers/SAS on the ground and we only have the messengers word for it, that British police actually pulled the triggers that day. I suspect otherwise.

I also believe that Blair was out of the Menzes loop and once it came crashing down, he knew he was going to be sacrificed, so he recorded his boss.

Racism and gay rights are NWO decoys.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=9466

Roland Baker
06 October 2008 at 17:47

So the Met is just like any other workplace? Everyone does their politics in the pub after work or indeed at work. As Muslims don't drink, it directly victimises them but also anyone else who doesn't drink. Many companies are run in "smoking pools" outside the premises which victimises anyone who doesn't smoke. Your pay and performance depend on the biased opinion of a talentless creep who despises you for your skills because he hasn't got any. Welcome to the private sector. It's not personal. It comes with being a liege man of life and limb to live and die against all manner of folks.

Victims are everywhere. The ones I feel sorry for are the victims lying dead while the Met indulges in the luxury of civil war divided on racial lines instead of policing the streets.

Ghaffur broke the sub judice rule on his proceedings by holding a press conference. He is a police officer he ought to understand the rules of evidence. Ali Dizaei is a controversial character every bit as bad as some white colleagues he may criticise and worse than many. They have two of the top three jobs in the Met and there is only one vacancy for the top job.

Sir Ian Blair was due for resignation on an accumulation of matters, not least the current inquest into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes. Sir Ian Blair clung only to not having been found guilty of personal or systemic failure even though the HSE found against the Met as a whole. He should have gone then. Boris Johnson dropped a major clanger in not bringing his concerns to the MPA now he is Chair and then following due process with the Home Secretary. He won't make the same mistake again.

sweety
07 October 2008 at 02:25

You people never explain how a devout muslim is supposed to square the circle whilst working with a Gay Officer!

Levy
07 October 2008 at 20:25

As a serving police officer who is also of an ethnic minority, although not visible, I have difficulties understanding and accepting the views expressed recently with regard to there being a systematic problem within the MPS of discrimination. I obviously accept that there will be exceptions in terms of isolated problems, what do we expect with regard to an organisation of over 50,000. However on a team that includes a number of individuals from ethnic minorities and openly LBGT officers I have seen no issues arise due to any sort of discrimination. I have spoken to all the officers that I allude to and they concur with my assessment.

So what could explain these issues of reported feelings of discrimination and disproportionate representation of BME officers in the service. Her are a number of thoughts:

Having come from an ethnic minority I have often heard people from my own background complain about being discriminated against when I would not have even thought to attribute this cause to the set back. Usually this would be due to there being a more obvious and outwardly expressed reason. I also find the likelihood of this sort of explanation coming from people who are external attributors of circumstance., rather than people who accept that they may not be good enough, qualified enough, or even likable enough.

Furthermore incorrect external attribution, or a chip on a shoulder as it might be called, is in itself very unattractive. As such a person who might otherwise get on within a social group, or an organisation, may find themselves held back even more. An endless feedback cycle to the feeling of exclusion they might feel.

Disproportionate representation and schemes to tackle this also fail to fully appreciate certain aspects of the minority culture. I have as a person from a minority been asked by many people of my own background questions such as “Why are you serving this country?” like it is not my own, or “Why risk your life for these people?” In essence stating that I should really be looking after my ‘own’ people and not those of the country which I now just happen to live in. I am sure that for each minority there would be similar reasons not to be a member of a British police service. However in my mind, at least in the case of my experience, this is a prejudice of my minority against society as a whole, in some way thinking of the British as “others” not worthy of my possible sacrifice.

I can honestly say that I feel proud to be serving an organisation such as the Met.

sweety
21 October 2008 at 05:17

Levy, I respect your views and you expressed them well.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the third runway at Heathrow go ahead?