Up, up and away — how money power works Down Under
Qantas, the oldest continuously operating airline, was also the world’s safest . . . until it got ta
By John Pilger Published 22 March 2012
Qantas, the oldest continuously operating airline, was also the world’s safest . . . until it got taken out of public ownership.
One of my first jobs as a junior reporter was to meet flights bringing famous people to Australia. Growing up in a country far from everywhere (except, as my father would say, "where you come from"), I was led to believe that Australia's honour was at risk unless a well-known person from Over There said something flattering about us, preferably the moment they arrived at Sydney Airport. There was a designated list of attributes they could comment on. These were: the weather, the beaches, the harbour, the harbour bridge, the happy people, the beer. When an exhausted Elizabeth Taylor stepped off her piston-engined flight from California and faced the mandatory barrage of questions, she replied: "Where am I, for Christ's sake?"
This was understandable but ill-advised. Readers of the Australian press were warned that Taylor and her husband Mike Todd, the Hollywood producer, were problem people who did not appreciate their good fortune in being among us. Todd's "dwarf-like and grizzled" appearance and the size of the bags under his wife's eyes became the subjects of particular tabloid scorn. Their stay was brief.
Ground forced
It was the first scheduled jet flight that drew us closer to the rest of humanity. This momentous occasion gave me my first front-page story in the Sydney Daily Telegraph, which declared solemnly, "A new era in civil aviation has dawned . . ." The inaugural aircraft was a Boeing 707 of the national airline, Qantas, an acronym for Queensland and Northern Territory Aerial Services. Founded in 1920 in the outback town of Winton, Queensland, Qantas is today the world's oldest continuously operating airline and, along with Don Bradman and the Sydney Harbour Bridge, occupies a place in the nation's affections. Most important, it is the only major international airline in the jet age never to have lost an aircraft in a fatal accident. Perhaps wary of holding such a distinction to fortune, Qantas advertising never mentions it.
In recent years, however, the safest airline has had close calls, including an Airbus A330 going into a sudden dive in 2008 and injuring up to 74 people, a Boeing 747 engine that blew up after leaving San Francisco in 2010 and a new A380 whose engine shattered over Singapore later that year. These, and a series of less serious incidents, have all happened since the airline was taken out of public ownership and handed to global banks. The largest shareholders include JPMorgan, HSBC and Citicorp, which are also among the top shareholders of Australia's major banks and largest mining companies. The national airline, like the Australian economy, is mortgaged: the product of a bipartisan political system dominated by rapacious business.
It was an article of faith that the world's only island-continent, flanked by the two greatest oceans, needed a long-haul airline - until the asset-strippers took control. What followed is a cautionary, universal tale. Last October, without warning, the Qantas chief executive, Alan Joyce, ordered the grounding of the airline's global fleet. More than 68,000 passengers were stranded in 22 countries and the entire Qantas workforce was locked out without pay. Joyce later admitted that tickets had been sold "mistakenly" for flights that Qantas management knew would never take off; the grounding had been planned well in advance.
This unprecedented action was the climax of a plan to crush the unions, Murdoch-style, and to take much of the company "offshore". A subsidiary airline based in Asia would employ fewer staff and pay them less, including pilots and engineers, in conditions once unknown to the world's safest airline. For a decade, the company has been building wholly or partly owned domestic and regional airlines on this cut-price basis while closing Qantas routes.
The fleet grounding was presented in Australia's mostly Murdoch-owned capital city press as the result of an intractable industrial dispute. In fact, the unions were negotiating, and the domestic network was not in dispute at all - yet its workforce was also locked out without pay. As if on cue, Prime Minister Julia Gillard stepped in, using powers under the Labor government's Thatcher-like industrial relations agency known as Fair Work Australia (FWA) which allow employers to lock out their employees without notice and require none of the ballots and processes forced on unions.
Taming the unions
Gillard ordered an emergency sitting of the FWA arbitration court which in effect ruled in favour of the company, cancelling the lockout yet stopping the workforce from taking action against the coming destruction of their jobs. The Transport Workers Union offered only vocal resistance. As in Britain and America, the unions have long been tamed, co-opted and policed by their own leadership. Gillard's workplace relations minister is Bill Shorten, a former union boss whose political ambitions and boasts of ties to the business elite are highlighted in cables released by WikiLeaks.
The day before he announced the grounding and lockout without pay, Joyce received a pay rise of 71 per cent, to A$5m a year. Last year, Qantas recorded a before-tax profit of A$552m, having doubled its net profits and increased its revenue. In February, the company announced that, as a result of a sharp fall in this year's profits - caused, not surprisingly, by the grounding of the fleet and the consequential loss of business - it planned to cut up to 2,500 jobs, including maintenance engineers and pilots. The catch-22 caused barely a political ripple and Qantas management was congratulated in the media for its "courageous stand". According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the loss of revenue is "a case study in Australia's ability to cope with globalisation". In a choice of words Qantas passengers might find unsettling, the paper said the airline had to "compete or die".
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


10 comments
Some points that Pilger missed. First, as much as the Powers that Be would love to see unions vanish forever, they never will. Why? Because in a sense the rest of us who struggle to survive must be allowed to have the illusion (for lack of a better phrase) that a union offers you some protection. That way they'll potentially have more negotiating power.
Another is that unions need to be more responsible to their members. How many union leaders enjoy first class travel, hotels, expense accounts and all the rest of it? Their usual response is, we have to be able to compete with the lobbyists to get what we want. Nice idea, but not always true.
The last is this. Union solidarity will never happen because that's not the union leader's job. My job is to get the best possible deal ONLY for my members. Screw everybody else. Yes, saying "solidarity!" on Newsnight looks good. In reality, that doesn't happen.
Which union is the most powerful in Australia? Which one is the most powerful in the U.K.? Does Pilger belong to the NUJ and other media unions as well? If yes, odds are that if push comes to shove, the response from union leadership will be don't f**k with our union. In the States, SAG/AFTRA is still one of the most powerful. The last time they went on strike, the local LA economy lost $1 billion. Do you really think that the most powerful will hesitate to use that power? No they won't. Now, if it's used to achieve the right result all around, that's one thing. Example: the 40 hour work week in the States. However, the rich and powerful right wing always develops selective amnesia and omits this when appearing on cable news screamfests.
.
An excellent article. Privatisation of essential services is a disaster. When will Labour call for renationalisation of rail and utilities, and a reversal of the last 30 years of UK policy. Would this be an electoral disaster? Tomorrow, quite possibly. But the role of political parties is to educate, inform, and organise. Not to pander and manipulate. Tory-lite Labour will never do much more than the Lib Dems are doing right now. Have faith in the day after tomorrow, and become a political party capable of effecting real change over the long haul.
There is no point in going into politics. Or business. Or the trade unions. Or anything else. No one, whoever you are, in any walk of life, anywhere in the world, will ever match Pilger's level of moral and ethical perfection (except the chimerical Chomskassangie beast) Pilger's shit does not smell. Pilger is The Greatest Investigative Reporter In The World. Pilger, as his acolytes on this comment string frequently point out, is a cross between Jesus Buddha, Einstein, Orwell, and Mother Teresa.
As Jon above points out, Quantas is still a publically owned company. As I now point out, it's change in status has NOT actually changed it's record re safety. They still aint had a fatal crash: unlike the state owned Soviet airlines and their successors, who have probably killed more people than a medium sized war. If you look at the record over the last 50 yrs, the truth is the precise opposite of what Pilger is arguing (or appears to be arguing - it's sometimes quite difficult to see what his thrust actually is, apart from demonstrating his moral superioity) State owned airlines have a far worse safety record that privately owned ones.
Pilger is right, so right. Try examining the freight train industry in the UK, the subsidised companies, the non subsidised companies, what is left in tatters...
Perhaps Jon is confusing publically-owned with publically-quoted. Qantas was privatised in the early 1990s.
Erm.. but Qantas is still a public company. ASX code QAN if you want to look for yourself.
There are statistics and then other statistics. The FACT is that Australia is the safest place to fly to and fly from. It has NOTHING to do with what airline flies here and who owns it. The rest is just rubbish (on the point of safety). What airline do you fly with when you come to visit John? If it isn't Qantas then why do you choose the other(s) if you are really worried about your personal safety?
"unlike the state owned Soviet airlines and their successors, who have probably killed more people than a medium sized war."
Sir, what planet are you from? The Soviets had never had any negotiation power with the state. The trade-unions were dressing windows only, always. You are welcome to compare the uninterested-in-other-human-lives bankers with the Soviet Politburo psychopaths. The kind of irritation you have with Pilger's journalism and Chomsky's writings makes an impression that you are irritated by honesty.
Mr Pilger always sheds light. The light does not always reach all corners - but he is among the most illuminating of commentators.
Quote: 'This unprecedented action was the climax of a plan to crush the unions'. Unions are small change compared to nations, that too must be crushed. Pilger has been blind to the taming of Sri Lanka - a quiet aside in the US/Western big game. Yesterday the US resolution (to encourage human rights!!) against Sri Lanka was passed at the UNHRC.
The door is opened for unending invasion of yet another country that is not tame enough. Unlike the now tame India under the pliant plant Manmohan Singh (who was originally placed as Finance Minister as a now forgotten condition of a big bailout long ago).
Tamils are once again being destroyed, prey to becoming cat's paw once more, as part of the US and western game plan. Pilger was (still is?) party to the narrative that stirred them up, then chomped them up and spat them out once. Now resurrected for re-use, they will be chomped up and again spat out by India and the US.
How nations are crushed or tamed is more troubling than how unions are. Using rights of 'ethnic groups' is a strong weapon here. Look all round the globe.