Flying the flag, faking the news
Loud noises from Washington about a US pull-out from Iraq are a poor disguise for America’s determin
By John Pilger Published 02 September 2010
Edward Bernays, the American nephew of Sigmund Freud, is said to have invented modern propaganda. During the First World War, he was one of a group of influential liberals who mounted a secret government campaign to persuade reluctant Americans to send an army to the bloodbath in Europe. In his book Propaganda, published in 1928, Bernays wrote that the "intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society", and that the manipulators "constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power in our country". Instead of propaganda, he coined the euphemism "public relations".
The American tobacco industry hired Bernays to convince women that they should smoke in public. By associating smoking with women's
liberation, he made cigarettes "torches of freedom". In 1954, he conjured a communist menace in Guatemala as an excuse for overthrowing the democratically elected government, whose social reforms were threatening the United Fruit Company's monopoly of the banana trade. He called it a "liberation".
Bernays was no rabid right-winger. He was an elitist liberal who believed that "engineering public consent" was for the greater good. This could be achieved by the creation of "false realities" which then became "news events". Here are examples of how it is done these days.
False reality The last US combat troops have left Iraq "as promised, on schedule", according to President Barack Obama. The TV news has been filled with cinematic images of the "last US soldiers", silhouetted against the dawn light, crossing the border into Kuwait.
Fact They have not left. At least 50,000 troops will continue to operate from 94 bases. American air assaults are unchanged, as are special forces' assassinations. The number of "military contractors" is 100,000 and rising. Most Iraqi oil is now under direct foreign control.
False reality BBC presenters have described the departing US troops as a "sort of victorious army" that has achieved "a remarkable change in [Iraq's] fortunes". Their commander, General David Petraeus, is a "celebrity", "charming", "savvy" and "remarkable".
Fact There is no victory of any sort. There is a catastrophic disaster, and attempts to present it as otherwise are a model of Bernays's campaign to "rebrand" the slaughter of the First World War as "necessary" and "noble". In 1980, Ronald Reagan, running for president, rebranded the invasion of Vietnam, in which up to three million people died, as a "noble cause", a theme taken up enthusiastically by Hollywood. Today's Iraq war movies have a similar purging theme: the invader as both idealist and victim.
False reality It is not known how many Iraqis have died. They are "countless", or maybe "in the tens of thousands".
Fact As a direct consequence of the Anglo-American-led invasion, a million Iraqis have died. This figure, from Opinion Research Business, follows peer-reviewed research by Johns Hopkins University in Washington, DC, whose methods were secretly affirmed as "best practice" and "robust" by the Blair government's chief scientific adviser. This is rarely reported or presented to "charming" American generals. Neither is the dispossession of four million Iraqis, the malnourishment of most Iraqi children, the epidemic of mental illness, or the poisoning of the environment.
False reality The British economy has a deficit of billions which must be reduced with cuts in public services and regressive taxation, in a spirit of "we're all in this together".
Fact We are not in this together. What is remarkable about this PR triumph is that only 18 months ago, the diametric opposite filled TV screens and front pages. Then, in a state of shock, truth became unavoidable, if briefly. The Wall Street and City of London trough was on full view for the first time, along with the venality of once-celebrated snouts. Billions in public money went to inept and crooked organisations known as banks, which were spared debt liability by their Labour government sponsors.
Within a year, record profits and personal bonuses were posted and the "black hole" was no longer the responsibility of the banks, whose debt is to be paid by those not in any way responsible: the public. The received media wisdom of this "necessity" is now a chorus, from the BBC to the Sun. A masterstroke, Bernays would surely say.
False reality Ed Miliband offers a "genuine alternative" as leader of the Labour Party.
Fact Miliband, like his brother and almost all those standing for the Labour leadership, is immersed in the effluent of New Labour. As a New Labour MP and minister, he did not refuse to serve under Blair or to speak out against Labour's persistent warmongering. He now calls the invasion of Iraq a "profound mistake". Calling it a mistake insults the memory and the dead. It was a crime, of which the evidence is voluminous. He has nothing new to say about the other colonial wars, none of them mistakes. Neither has he demanded basic social justice - that those who caused the recession clear up the mess and that Britain's fabulously rich corporate minority be taxed seriously, starting with Rupert Murdoch.
The good news is that false realities often fail when the public trusts its own critical intelligence. Two classified documents recently released by WikiLeaks express the CIA's concern that the populations of European countries, which oppose their governments' war policies, are not succumbing to the usual propaganda spun through the media.
For the rulers of the world, this is a conundrum, because their unaccountable power rests on the false reality that no popular resistance works. And it does.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


96 comments
While i agree with some of Pilger's sentiments, this is unfortunately one of his clumsiest articles. He seems to believe that we inhabit a black/white moral universe. His constant need to cast an enemy (a loose coalition of the rich, politicians, conservatives...) as pervasively machiavellian is tedious and inaccurate.
Sam G
02 September 2010 at 14:11
Pilger calls it as he sees it, and he sees more clearly than most. I suggest you take your blinkers off Sam G
That article is a hash job. Behind the glaring inaccuracies - like the one Mark mentions above - there is a story worth reporting. Only the blinkered Pilgerites will fail to see the shortcomings. To the rest of us the piece lacks credibility; which is a shame.
Thomas Devine
02 September 2010 at 14:19
If this is American Imperialism, how come the Iraqis sold most of their oil to China and Russia?
The Iraqis aren't selling the oil dummy, it's being sold by the american oil companies who controll it, for a nice big profit. wake up and smell the coffee for gods sake !
The methodology used for the one million figure (see Lancet etc.) is that same as that used to estimate the deaths in the Rwandan genocide, yet no UK/US politicians see fit to dispute that because there is no political advantage in doing so.
I'm sorry, but what are you smoking??? This whole article is the ramblings of a man so wrapped in his carefully-constructed dream world that its is totally devoid from reality.
I have neither the time nor the inclination to debunk your inaccurate facts (including citing 1 million dead as a result of us/uk troops), nor to point out your totally baseless smears and innuendo.
The line "Most Iraqi oil is now under direct foreign control" is a classic John Pilger - no, it has been sold off to foreign companies not foreign governments. BP, Texaco, Chevron etc are not under the control of the White House or 10 Downing Street. The Iraqi government leased their oilfields out because it was more profitable for them to do that than exploit the resources themselves.
Your headline is "Loud noises from Washington about a US pull-out from Iraq are a poor disguise for America’s determination to keep waging war". I have so far failed to find a single justification for this idiocy in your article.
John Pilger is a man wrapped in so many layers of "false realities", aided and encouraged by the LSE stereotypes that dominate his comments thread, that I don't think he has seen daylight in a long, long time.
As always I scratch my head in wonder why the NS pays his salary. They certainly aren't getting their money's worth.
the left/right paradigm is a joke as are you if you don't think your every move is being watched in this day and age.
and, i am a lot saner than you think. romaticist? maybe. good person? definitely, with a strong perception of what is good and evil in this world.
FYI i hate no-one exept bullies. what about you?
@ConcernedCitizen and @Thomas Devine:
Why do you two post comments after every one John Pilger's NS articles?
No, seriously I want to know. You both accuse him of being a loony-lefty yet apparently take great interest in what he has to say...
You are both rather strident in your dismissal of the USA's imperialism. You deny there is any kind of empire then claim that Pilger and anyone who reads him is under the influence of leftist propaganda.
My question to you two is this: Why, if you hate Pilger, do you comment here every time?
A more conspiracy-orientated person than myself would assume you both work for PR firms, like all those who comment after every global warming article.
Neither of you have produced any evidence which counters the FACTS in the above article - because you can't.
Now sod off to a forum where you fit in.
We are indebted to John Pilger for his perspicacity, his deep insight and fearless exposure of the American menace which has prosecuted more wars and murdered more innocent civilians throughout the globe in our life time through sheer ignorance and at the behest of the many tails which wag its body than the enemies of whom we are warned : the Israeli lobby, the oil lobby, the munitions lobby etc etc. Pilger's detractors you can be assured are of similar ilk - from the same stable.Long live Pilger.
@Iden
07 September 2010 at 14:28
@ConcernedCitizen and @Thomas Devine:
"Neither of you have produced any evidence which counters the FACTS in the above article - because you can't. "
Now sod off to a forum where you fit in."
Begging your pardon 'iden' but can you please let us all know how you can class the above as 'FACTS'? Is there any link in the above article which allows us to do further reading, or indeed investigate his assertions? No.
Now I'm not being dismissive of 'USA Imperialism' but you are no more dismissive of their points than they are of Pilger's. Granted this is only my 2nd time posting in NS and I don't know how many times the aforementioned posters get their articles published, but you have absolutely NO basis to state that Pilger's above statements are FACTS. Please post links to the articles mentioned above and I'll listen to it. I might as well say 'The Bible says God exists therefore he does' I don't believe in an almighty being but only because I've used rational discourse to discount such notions. Don't try and come across as correct and infallable when you are no better at asserting your claims than the other posters are of dismissing Pilger's.