Flying the flag, faking the news

Loud noises from Washington about a US pull-out from Iraq are a poor disguise for America’s determin

Edward Bernays, the American nephew of Sigmund Freud, is said to have invented modern propaganda. During the First World War, he was one of a group of influential liberals who mounted a secret government campaign to persuade reluctant Americans to send an army to the bloodbath in Europe. In his book Propaganda, published in 1928, Bernays wrote that the "intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society", and that the manipulators "constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power in our country". Instead of propaganda, he coined the euphemism "public relations".

The American tobacco industry hired Bernays to convince women that they should smoke in public. By associating smoking with women's
liberation, he made cigarettes "torches of freedom". In 1954, he conjured a communist menace in Guatemala as an excuse for overthrowing the democratically elected government, whose social reforms were threatening the United Fruit Company's monopoly of the banana trade. He called it a "liberation".

Bernays was no rabid right-winger. He was an elitist liberal who believed that "engineering public consent" was for the greater good. This could be achieved by the creation of "false realities" which then became "news events". Here are examples of how it is done these days.

False reality The last US combat troops have left Iraq "as promised, on schedule", according to President Barack Obama. The TV news has been filled with cinematic images of the "last US soldiers", silhouetted against the dawn light, crossing the border into Kuwait.

Fact They have not left. At least 50,000 troops will continue to operate from 94 bases. American air assaults are unchanged, as are special forces' assassinations. The number of "military contractors" is 100,000 and rising. Most Iraqi oil is now under direct foreign control.

False reality BBC presenters have described the departing US troops as a "sort of victorious army" that has achieved "a remarkable change in [Iraq's] fortunes". Their commander, General David Petraeus, is a "celebrity", "charming", "savvy" and "remarkable".

Fact There is no victory of any sort. There is a catastrophic disaster, and attempts to present it as otherwise are a model of Bernays's campaign to "rebrand" the slaughter of the First World War as "necessary" and "noble". In 1980, Ronald Reagan, running for president, rebranded the invasion of Vietnam, in which up to three million people died, as a "noble cause", a theme taken up enthusiastically by Hollywood. Today's Iraq war movies have a similar purging theme: the invader as both idealist and victim.

False reality It is not known how many Iraqis have died. They are "countless", or maybe "in the tens of thousands".

Fact As a direct consequence of the Anglo-American-led invasion, a million Iraqis have died. This figure, from Opinion Research Business, follows peer-reviewed research by Johns Hopkins University in Washington, DC, whose methods were secretly affirmed as "best practice" and "robust" by the Blair government's chief scientific adviser. This is rarely reported or presented to "charming" American generals. Neither is the dispossession of four million Iraqis, the malnourishment of most Iraqi children, the epidemic of mental illness, or the poisoning of the environment.

False reality The British economy has a deficit of billions which must be reduced with cuts in public services and regressive taxation, in a spirit of "we're all in this together".

Fact We are not in this together. What is remarkable about this PR triumph is that only 18 months ago, the diametric opposite filled TV screens and front pages. Then, in a state of shock, truth became unavoidable, if briefly. The Wall Street and City of London trough was on full view for the first time, along with the venality of once-celebrated snouts. Billions in public money went to inept and crooked organisations known as banks, which were spared debt liability by their Labour government sponsors.

Within a year, record profits and personal bonuses were posted and the "black hole" was no longer the responsibility of the banks, whose debt is to be paid by those not in any way responsible: the public. The received media wisdom of this "necessity" is now a chorus, from the BBC to the Sun. A masterstroke, Bernays would surely say.

False reality Ed Miliband offers a "genuine alternative" as leader of the Labour Party.

Fact Miliband, like his brother and almost all those standing for the Labour leadership, is immersed in the effluent of New Labour. As a New Labour MP and minister, he did not refuse to serve under Blair or to speak out against Labour's persistent warmongering. He now calls the invasion of Iraq a "profound mistake". Calling it a mistake insults the memory and the dead. It was a crime, of which the evidence is voluminous. He has nothing new to say about the other colonial wars, none of them mistakes. Neither has he demanded basic social justice - that those who caused the recession clear up the mess and that Britain's fabulously rich corporate minority be taxed seriously, starting with Rupert Murdoch.

The good news is that false realities often fail when the public trusts its own critical intelligence. Two classified documents recently released by WikiLeaks express the CIA's concern that the populations of European countries, which oppose their governments' war policies, are not succumbing to the usual propaganda spun through the media.

For the rulers of the world, this is a conundrum, because their unaccountable power rests on the false reality that no popular resistance works. And it does.

96 comments

writeon1's picture

The figure of a million excess deaths in Iraq as a result of the invasion, and its ghastly, destructive, and very bloody aftermath, is 'nothing' compared to the number of Iraqis killed by our onslaught on Iraq over the last twenty years or so.

As, western 'liberal and democratic' governments and politicians, cannot be guilty of using terror on a massive scale against our enemies, they can't be responsible for something close to genocide in relation to Iraq either, regardless of the facts.

Conservatively, somewhere around 3,000,000 Iraqis have been killed over the last couple of decades in the long war against Iraq. A war designed to bring the country to its knees, draw it permanently into our sphere of influence, and give us ultimate control over its vast resources of oil and gas. One of the greatest strategic prizes in history. And now it's in our pocket, though at a horrendous cost for the long-suffering people of Iraq.

Saddam was a harsh and brutal dictator, but his crimes pale compared to the reign of terror our, socalled, democratic leaders have unleashed on Iraq over the last twenty years. I doubt that the dead care whether they are slaughtered by vicious dictator or a benign democrat.

ConcernedCitizen's picture

@ Iden: "My question to you two is this: Why, if you hate Pilger, do you comment here every time? "

No you couldn't answer the two simple questions could you. So here it is again:

1) Which American is determined to "keep waging war"? Sonia Sotomoyor? Eric Holder? Steven Chu? Fareed Zakaria?
2) If it's true that that the US keeps waging war, why does it accept more immigrants than any other country in the world?

@ Greg101: "did you get that one out of the News Corp Guide to Personal Insults or did you manage to think of it all by yourself?"

I never knew News Corp published a book called Guide to Personal Insults. But if it did, neither did I manage to think that by myself; I was simply ripping a page out of the Pilger's leftist textbook of "Fighting Fire with Fire: The Guide to Countering Right-Wing propaganda"

@fairplay: "please dont put glenn "attention seeking move with the times and say what my masters want me to say" beck in the same sentence as JP. you are so far off the mark and sadly, now proven to be a typical american who watches the charade of the MSM over there and believes in it."

Notwithstanding the fact that you don't believe that Pilger is a puppet for socialist new world order proves that you are a typical communist who unsurprisingly reads the disinformation campaign incessantly pumped out by the al-Jazeera and New Statesman MSM, for a person who supposedly believes in fairplay, you have a pathetically warped sense of justice. So the fact that somebody disagrees with the valid notion that Beck and Pilger are two cheeks of the same ass makes them a typical mindless American? Go figure, and this coming from a person in the crowd whose common theme is to protest against the pernicious effects of making generalizations about social/ethnic groups.

Yes it's true. Americans (and by extension most Westerners) hate socialism and with comments that are beneath contempt from subhumans like fairplay, can you really blame them?

@ writeon: "After all, war is the real reason for the existance of the modern US empire, which at heart is a military empire, certainly abroad, and increasingly at home."

And of course your utopia of Soviet Russia, communist Venezuela or Islamic Repubic of Iran is not militaristic.

Actually come to think of it, maybe the US and the EU should become less militaristic and adopt the more peaceful policies of Venezuela, Iran, Russia and China where: homosexuals are stoned, ethnic minorities are killed, freedom of religion is non-existent, Internet censorship is the norm, political dissidents are assassinated, social activists are jailed, the military controls the public and the government controls the media.

That way, the West can live in a state of permanent schizophrenia where the massacre of people like you can be justified in the cause of "protecting the honour of the identity and history of the glorious nation!"

@ Gregory Fegel: Okay so I'll take your paranoid theories true liberals like Ahmadinejad, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Chavez and Kim-Jong Il would never support "exploitation, wars of aggression, and propaganda." So answer me this: did you know that over 24 million famine-stricken people are living in the hellhole that is the liberal utopia of North Korea?

ToNYC's picture

If Us don't take advantage of global asymmetries to steal other countries assets and kill those who get in our way, some other country will. If Henry Kissinger didn't say that, he lived it and doesn't travel to many countries

tacklinfuel's picture

I appreciate John Pilger's writings. He does, however, have the tendency to undermine the credibility of his valid criticisms by wording them in black and white, almost Manichean terms - I refer to the banks "debt is to be paid by those not in any way responsible: the public". Whilst the crisis was largely precipitated by the greed, stupidity and institutional delusions of the banks, granting that the public have no intelligence or agency over events, and therefore bear NO responsibility is both simplistic and insulting.

Whilst those at the top should bear the brunt of the blame, the 'public' at large are also complicit in their consumer desires, willful ignorance and patterns of consumption.

Painting a black and white picture does not support the progressive cause, it just makes it seem naive and simplistic.

Amere-Brush-hand's picture

William Blum, the author of 'Rogue State' and 'Killing Hope' has written:

"If you flip over the rock of American foreign policy of the past century, this is what crawls out"....................

invasions............bombings...........overthrowing governments..........occupations.........suppressing movements for social change.............assassinating political leaders................perverting elections.........manipulating labour unions.....

manufacturing "news".....economic and political sanctions......death squads....... torture........biological warfare......depleted uranium.....drug trafficking.....mercenaries

It's not a pretty picture.
It is enough to give imperialism a bad name.

William Blum is another great journalist who methodically deconstructs the idea that America supports democracy or is a force for good in the world.

James's picture

To anyone one this board who is claiming intellectual rights over the work of John Pilger i'd really to see where you've travelled, who you've interviewed, and your obviously huge body of literary writings. I thank John Pilger you have taught me a lot about how the world operates.

Nick's picture

Someone has been watching Adam Curtis' Century of the Self...

Anton's picture

to the first nine tenth's of these comments
liberal or conservative your arguments suck you guys are using identical arguments against each other it's redundant
fairplay you are a weirdo
the other tenth was actually intelligent
unlike me

kinggeorgethethirdesquire's picture

Writeon..writeon! Your comments are spot on!

Dorian's picture

Excellent Article as always John, you put it as clearly as Orwell ever could.

Latest tweets