What if . . . . . . the Romanovs had been exiled
By Dominic Sandbrook Published 26 July 2010
The message could hardly have been more explicit. "Events last week have deeply distressed me," George V wrote to his cousin Nicky in March 1917. "My thoughts are constantly with you and I shall always remain your true and devoted friend, as you know I have been in the past." But it was never delivered. Only days earlier, Nicholas II, emperor of all the Russias, had abdicated his throne and, amid the surge of revolutionary sentiment, the new provisional government's foreign minister, Pavel Milyukov, warned that he could never receive it.
But as demand for the Romanovs' execution swelled, Milyukov began to wonder whether they wouldn't be better off if they were outside Russia. On 21 March, he asked the British ambassador if they could be offered asylum. It was one of the most fateful requests in our history.
Frigate to the rescue
Although the Romanovs' arrival in Britain seems inevitable now, it might never have come to pass. Even as Nicholas - by this time under house arrest at his palace in Petrograd - was making packing lists for the journey west, and even as his wife, Alix, was remembering her holidays with Queen Victoria, Cousin George was getting cold feet.
By early April, his private secretary recorded that the king was receiving "letters from people in all classes of life . . . saying how much the matter is being discussed, not only in clubs but by working men, and that Labour members of the House of Commons [were] expressing adverse opinions of the proposal".
Was George going to withdraw his invitation? It looked like it. But then, while he was going through his stamp albums one morning, a photo fell out. It showed the two cousins George and Nicky, side by side at the wedding of the kaiser's daughter in 1913. Tears sprang to George's eyes; all his doubts fell away.
Getting the Romanovs out of Russia was one of history's great secret operations, later immortalised in Roger Moore's film Russian Getaway. The task fell to military intelligence, known then as MI1. In May 1918, five British agents stormed the house in Ekaterinburg where the Bolsheviks were holding the royal family. Two agents were killed, but the others managed to get the Romanovs into the waiting getaway cars. They headed north to Murmansk, occupied by Allied and White Russian forces, where a Royal Navy frigate was waiting. Two weeks later, Nicholas II walked into the great hall at Sandringham to greet his cousin. He tried to speak, but there were no words. A moment later, he was weeping.
At first, George's misgivings seemed to have been groundless. After he changed the royal family's name from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor, there was a surge of patriotic support for the monarchy, and when the Romanovs took their first steps in public, strolling along the seafront at Bognor, there were cheers from the watching crowd. But once the war was over, public disillusionment began to set in. Amid the intense labour unrest of the early 1920s, the Romanovs became a popular target for socialist agitators, encouraged by Grigory Zinoviev's new Comintern. In 1921, Nicky and Alix were jostled by demonstrators while leaving the London premiere of Charlie Chaplin's The Kid. A year later, their youngest daughter, Anastasia, was kidnapped by Irish republicans and released only after Lloyd George's government secretly paid a huge ransom. Admitting the Russians, the PM said glumly, was "the worst decision" he had ever made.
Bombed out
Under other circumstances, perhaps the General Strike of 1926 would have passed off differently. But when, on 6 May, a bomb exploded outside the Romanovs' house on the Sandringham estate, an angry mob besieged the Soviet embassy in London. By the following morning, small patrols of British Fascists, who had already distributed anti-strike propaganda, were roaming the streets looking for strikers and socialists. When another bomb exploded at the Café Royal two nights later, the new prime minister, Stanley Baldwin, came close to collapse. The strikers gave way, but Baldwin's health was broken, and by the summer he was gone.
The rest is history, from the succession of the hardliner Winston Churchill and the formation of the national government to the anti-communist alliance with Italy and the second Allied intervention in Soviet Russia. It is odd now to reflect that, if only George V had not seen that photograph, it could all have been so different.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

8 comments
The Bolshavics overthrew Alexander Kerensky, the tsar had already advocated in March before Lenin and Trotsky entered Russia financed by international bankers like Jacob schiff who was angered with the Romanov Dynasty as they stood in the way of there plans and would not allow a Russian Central Bank. They certainly didnt deserve what happened.
Russia Could have been a democratic Constitutional Monharchy had the October Revolution not had taken place. The Bolshevics overthrew Socialist Revolutionary Government of Alexander Kerensky. Lenin and Trotsky killed peasants and rebel workers too look up the Tambov rebellion and the Kronstadt uprising.
The Bolshavics overthrew Alexander Kerensky, the tsar had already advocated in March before Lenin and Trotsky entered Russia financed by international bankers like Jacob schiff who was angered with the Romanov Dynasty as they stood in the way of there plans and would not allow a Russian Central Bank. They certainly didnt deserve what happened.
The Bolshavics overthrew Alexander Kerensky, the tsar had already advocated in March before Lenin and Trotsky entered Russia financed by international bankers like Jacob schiff who was angered with the Romanov Dynasty as they stood in the way of there plans and would not allow a Russian Central Bank. They certainly didnt deserve what happened.
romanovs have got a noble girl baby.they sent the baby to rasputins relatives in the wine basket (under the botles) They were take her bulgaria and they were give her a turkish family(bektashi religions(she did not make,join rutiels all her lifelong)).the turkish family grove her.one day she maried and her husband and their 6 suns,2 douthers went in turkey 1953 and she died in turkey. she said again and again “I am gallers princess”all her lifelong. may be feodravna or may be one members of the OTMA was mother of the baby who can belive but god knows
I bless you
I FEEL VERY SAD ABUT THE FATE OF THE ROMANOVAS THE CHILDREN WERE BEAUTIFUL ABD VERY CLOSE TO EACH OTHER,THERE MOTHER WAS ALWAYS WORRIED ABOUT HER SON AND AS A MOTHER YOU CAN SENCE HER FEAR SO IT IS HEARTBREAKING TO THINK OF WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THER HEADS WHEN THEY WERE TAKEN TO THAT ROOM AND MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD,BUT IF ONLY THEY COULD OF BEEN IN TOUCH WITH THE NORMAL PEOPLE OF RUSSIA AT THAT TIME,LET US NOT FORGET THE MILLIONS OF CHILDREN STARVING THERE MOTHERS ALSO WORRYING ABOUT HOW TO FEED THERE OWN CHILDREN NO WORK FOR MEN FREZZING CONDITIONS FOR ALL,ALTHOUGH THIS NOT AN EXCUSE FOR THE FATE OF THOES CHILDREN AND EVEN THERE MOTHER I THINK IT IS VERY SAD MAYBE NICHOLAS SHOULD OF REALISED WHAT HIS PEOPLE WERE GOING THROUGH.
@ Clare
Okay. Um. Had to struggle through all your vehement capitals but seriously.. ok, so the royal family wasn't in touch with the people.. does that make murder okay?
Does that make the subsequent descent into a particularly nasty, fascist version of communism okay? I don't think so.
Russia might have been a democracy now, had it not been for that tragic event. It made people into animals, set the precedent for an awful century.
Wow. I never thought I'd see an Englishman ( I presume you're English, Sir?) write this. Yes, it could have all been different.