The rigged election: 10 tell-tale signs

Published 18 June 2009

1 Opinion polls showed that the leading opposition candidate, Mir Hossein Mousavi, had a strong lead over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the eve of the poll. This changed overnight into a landslide victory for Ahmadinejad.

2 Ahmadinejad won in Tehran – despite his noted unpopularity in Iran’s big cities, and despite Mousavi having drawn a million supporters on to the streets of the capital just days before polling.

3 Official results show Ahmadinejad beat Mousavi even in his home town, Tabriz, where ethnic Azeri candidates – such as Mousavi – are usually a shoo-in.

4 Mousavi is not alone in crying foul – the other two opposition candidates, the liberal Mehdi Karroubi and Mohsen Rezaei, a conservative, have also appealed against the official result.

5 Karroubi, a former Speaker, saw his vote share collapse from 17 per cent in 2005 to less than 1 per cent – even in his home province of Lorestan.

6 The Iranian authorities imposed a post-election information blackout. Cellphone networks went down and foreign websites such as the BBC and Facebook were blocked.

7 The interior ministry declared victory for Ahmadinejad only two hours after the polls closed. And the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, signed off on the result straight away, instead of following the normal three-day verification process.

8More than 100 members of the major opposition factions were arrested the day after the election, including high-profile figures such as the brother of the ex-president Mohammad Khatami.

9 There are reports of voting “irregularities” in pro-Mousavi cities. In Tabriz, for example, ballot papers ran out at 11am.

10 Ahmadinejad, an unpopular incumbent president in charge of a stagnant economy, got a higher proportion of the vote this time round than he did when he won in 2005 as a popular, fresh-faced insurgent.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

alexweir1949
20 June 2009 at 07:54

Iran shows global need for fraud-proof election systems

There exist such fraud-proof voting systems, but the West and China are terribly afraid of such systems, since they would eliminate pro-western dictators as well as anti-western dictators. Of the many many dictators globally (including the anti-western Ahmadinejad), 95% are pro-western dictators.

The west has resorted even to political assassination to keep such voting systems from seeing the light of day. But eventually justice, freedom, democracy and development will win out. Maybe Obama will have a hand in this, if he can cast off the very strong influence of the CIA, MI6, and Deuxieme Bureau.

Mr Alex Weir, Harare and Gaborone

Gideon Polya
21 June 2009 at 13:30

In total contradiction of this article in the NS by persons unknown, the following analysis by Ken Ballen and Patrick Doherty in the Washington Post (June 15 2009) says: "The election results in Iran may reflect the will of the Iranian people. Many experts are claiming that the margin of victory of incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the result of fraud or manipulation, but our nationwide public opinion survey of Iranians three weeks before the vote showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin -- greater than his actual apparent margin of victory in Friday's election ... Allegations of fraud and electoral manipulation will serve to further isolate Iran and are likely to increase its belligerence and intransigence against the outside world. Before other countries, including the United States, jump to the conclusion that the Iranian presidential elections were fraudulent, with the grave consequences such charges could bring, they should consider all independent information. The fact may simply be that the reelection of President Ahmadinejad is what the Iranian people wanted " (see: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06... ).

Camus
21 June 2009 at 17:54

The points you make are all valid, but they are not hard evidence. What we need are hard facts - how many

ballots were printed, how large is the electorate, how many valid votes cast and so on. Unless we have this information the election stands.

PlainSight
23 June 2009 at 08:55

Your ten telltale signs require serious review. If one is to subject the article to scrutiny based on closer analysis of the results and pundits' predictions, your article leaves much to be desired. Please read Prof James Petra's article on the issue at http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14018

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker