A bleak future for Baha'is

Moojan Momen

Published 13 May 2009

International pressure may have set Roxana Saberi free, but the plight of seven Iranian Baha'is, imprisoned in Tehran a year ago, has gone largely unnoticed.

Earlier this week, US-Iranian journalist Roxana Saberi was freed from prison in Iran after having her sentence for "spying" reduced. The charge, which she strongly denied, sparked international attention and calls for her release, which has now been widely welcomed.

But Ms Saberi leaves behind her many other inmates in Tehran's notorious Evin prison whose “crimes” against the Iranian state are also open to question.

Thursday (14 May) marks the first anniversary of the arrest and detention of seven prominent members of the Baha'i faith, Iran's largest non-Muslim religious minority.

The five men and two women made up an informal national committee, serving the needs of the country's 300,000 strong Baha'i community in the absence of formal Baha'i institutions, which are outlawed. Their committee – which had operated with the full knowledge of the authorities – along with all local ad hoc Baha'i administrations – was disbanded in March this year in a gesture of good will from the peaceful and law-abiding Baha'is to their government.

In the one year since their incarceration, the seven detainees have faced no charges nor have they been allowed access to their legal counsel, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate Dr Shirin Ebadi. They have faced spurious accusations of "espionage for Israel", and "insulting religious sanctities".

Iran’s prosecutor-general, Ayatollah Dorri-Najafabadi, has asserted that there is evidence that the seven have been involved in "intelligence-gathering" and "infiltration", thus more or less declaring their guilt before any trial date has been announced. The evidence he refers to has yet to be disclosed to the public or produced in a court of law.

In recent days, however, a report from the Baha'i's UN office indicates that another charge is being levelled against the seven prisoners; that of “spreading corruption on earth.”

To the Western reader, such an accusation may seem to be a confusing or even nebulous basis for criminal charges. But in theocratic Iran it has a basis in the penal code and leaves the accused in an extremely vulnerable position.

The term, found in the Koran, has increasingly been used within Islamic legal practice to brand any undesirable "offender": Muslims considered to be too lax in their practices; those who are considered socially evil, such as drug-traffickers and prostitutes; or those with whom the authorities have a fundamental theological disagreement, such as the Baha’is.

Vague as these charges may be, they still have the potential to lead the accused to the executioner.

The allegations against the Baha'is are as nonsensical as they are unjust. The accusations play to the fears of certain areas of the Iranian population about enemies - internal and external - conspiring to undermine the country.

Iran remains a state with a great sense of its own historic legacy and with a clear goal of attaining a mantle of regional leadership - of both moral, as well as political, dimensions.

For the seven Baha'is being held in the grim confines of their Evin cells, their best hope for release might lie in a public protest as widespread as the one that led to the freeing of Roxana Saberi.

Such an outcry may help Iran’s leaders to reflect that imprisoning and persecuting the innocent is not in their national interest.

Moojan Momen is an Iranian author and academic, and a Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

mhurt
13 May 2009 at 20:14

Why didn't the imprisoned Baha'is get the same coverage as the single news reporter?

AndrewRT
15 May 2009 at 14:05

"Moojan Momen is an Iranian author and academic, and a Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society"

He's also a leading Baha'i academic whose wife was the Chair of the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the UK. Hardly an independent neutral observer. This fact should be noted.

Kurt Hein
15 May 2009 at 20:42

A fair clarification.

I wonder what would be distinctive about "an independent neutral observer's" findings re: the Baha'is and the current practices of the Iranian government?

Kurt Hein, retired professor of Communicationa Baha'i in the U.S.

Nonagon47
16 May 2009 at 17:04

Andrew notes:

"He's also a leading Baha'i academic whose wife was the Chair of the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the UK. Hardly an independent neutral observer. This fact should be noted."

OK, duly noted. I would suppose that, were I a member of a persecuted group, and a scholar, I would be subject to the same suggestion. No problem. What I do know, as a Baha'i myself and an amateur scholar I can only say that the Baha'i scholars I've read and 'clipped' for commentary [always with attribution] have no particular axe to grind. Dr. Momen hasn't said anything that non-Baha'i scholars, Iranian and otherwise, haven't said ...

Perhaps NS was limited in textual space, and wanted to get it all in? ...

Bronwyn
16 May 2009 at 21:27

Does this make the plight or injustice to the imprisoned Bahai's any less important?

MarkoPo
17 May 2009 at 23:36

"There is no compulsion in religion" (Quran 2:257)

AndrewRT: I am curious about your own views of a situation in which compulsion is blatantly practiced?

Yes, Dr. Momen is a leading Baha'i academic! He was closely associated with Hand of the Cause of God H.M.Balyuzi, who wrote Muhammad and the Course of Islam. And read Dr. Momen's Introduction to Shi'i Islam, and Islam and the Baha'i Faith.

It is no partiality to stand up for the rights of one's faith in the world community; Baha'is also defend the rights of others, including Muslims. Why is that?

Nomadicdeity
18 May 2009 at 17:54

Mhurt asked: "Why didn't the imprisoned Baha'is get the same coverage as the single news reporter?"

I have wondered the same myself. My only thought is that the outside world (Non-Baha'i's and non-human rights activists) have heard very little about this. It has barely even been mentioned in the papers or the telly. perhaps this is why a Baha'i reporter is the one covering this subject and not a non-Baha'i.

My question is why aren't we doing more? Maybe we just don't know what to do...

The Bill H.Res.175 on the Baha’i in Iran was recently introduced to congress and is now under review. If you want to do something then write to your congressman (or woman)/MP and ask them to support it. tell your mates. Put it on facebook- do something. Whether you are a Baha'i or not these are our brothers and sisters whom have supported nothing but unity. Now it is our turn to support them and perhaps save them from execution

~Allah-u-Abha

AndrewRT
22 May 2009 at 16:41

Mhurt asked: "Why didn't the imprisoned Baha'is get the same coverage as the single news reporter?"

Countries tend to make a fuss when one of their citizens (or even residents) is unjustly treated in another country. Countries persecuting their own citizens make headlines far less often. That's the reality of "sovereignty" - whether you like or loath the concept, countries are much more hesitant to "interfere in internal matters".

That was why that case made the headlines and this one hasn't.

TerryMac
23 June 2009 at 20:59

"He's also a leading Baha'i academic whose wife was the Chair of the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the UK. Hardly an independent neutral observer. This fact should be noted."

TerryMac
23 June 2009 at 21:15

Okay AndrewRT :

Since you have made the affiliation of Dr Moomen and his wife an issue do you are to tell me what your affiliations are and why do you have this negative view of the Baha’is.. I am curious as to what your motives are.???

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker