Searching for Middle East peace

Jeremy Sare

Published 12 January 2009

Jeremy Sare discovers Creativity for Peace, an organisation that helps Israelis and Palestinians to talk about their anger and hatred

In the midst of a war zone, like Gaza, it is always easier to number the civilian and military dead than calculate the deep psychological damage to the whole population. It is the suppressed and unsuppressed anger and outrage which is likely to sustain the long-standing enmity between Palestinian and Israeli communities.

In recent years, several organisations have been established in the region whose aim is to break individuals’ cycle of hatred and aggression and find peace within themselves.

Anael Harpaz is director of the Middle East programme at Creativity for Peace, based in northern Galilee. Their organisation’s objective is to reach across cultural and religious boundaries and allow all sides to talk out their anger and desire for vengeance. They are staffed by both Israelis and Palestinians, many of whom have made the same dramatic psychological transformation.

Anael was brought up in 1950s South Africa by her father who was a leader in the Zionist movement, and says simply, “I grew up hating Arabs”. In 1969, she and her family “came home” and Anael eagerly joined the Israeli army, “to save my people”. She later married a pilot in the Israeli Air Force and brought up three children, living an isolated existence, “having no contact with Arabs”.

Anael’s epiphany was triggered in 1986 when her new born baby died. During a course of therapy she was compelled to confront her deeply buried personal anger. One day, as part of the healing process, she found herself being driven through the winding narrow roads to Nablus in the West Bank.

“It was the first time I was witness to the suffering of the so-called ‘enemy’. That day I felt like I had been standing on glass all my life and someone had just taken a hammer and smashed it. My whole belief system was being challenged. No-one ever told me that there was a whole other people also waiting to come home. And it is the same home as mine.”

The foundation of Creativity for Peace, if distilled into a few words, promotes the view that “an enemy is one whose story you have not yet heard”. This is a philosophy shared by equivalent organisations such as Combatants for Peace and Compassionate Listening. They teach the participants how to listen to other’s personal testimony without judgement and then speak freely about their own. So begins the process of releasing destructive personal aggression and regaining their sense of humanity.

Anael began her peace work during the second Intifada in 2000, visiting recently bereaved Arab families in Ramallah. A few months later she had formed a peace camp for girls mainly from Gaza, “they come with hatred, trauma, fear and terror and leave loving each other….magic happens here.” Today 126 girls have been through the intensive programme and many come back to lead more groups. It is the self-perpetuating succession of pupils becoming teachers which gives inspiration for others to join and strengthens the movement for peace.

But these are difficult times to even contemplate notions of a peaceful resolution in the longer-term. In recent days, Anael has understandably been in constant contact with friends in Gaza. Alongside the mounting toll of death and destruction, she is horrified by the absolute wretchedness the people feel.

She spoke to Ezahldeen, a doctor whose three daughters had completed the Creativity for Peace Programme. He went to the hospital in Jabiliya to offer his professional help but left in despair at the total lack of medical equipment and drugs to help the wounded and dying. He told her, “I wish they would kill us already. I don’t run for shelter any more, this is my way of living for eight years, if the rocket hits me I will die.”

The scale and extent of the current bloody conflict in Gaza is no doubt driving the work of the peacemakers backwards. But revelatory journeys to peace and forgiveness, like Anael Harpaz’s, give small but irreducible hope for reconciliation to have a permanent place in the region’s future.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

18 comments from readers

Amihai
12 January 2009 at 15:30

What Hamas has accomplished, among other things, is to have killed the idea of a two-state solution as two independent states, Israel being the nation-state of the Jewish people and Palestine as the nation-state of the Palestinian Arab people.

Two alternatives are:

1) For the Arabs of Judea and Samaria ("West Bank") on the one hand to continue manage their lives as Autonomy, and the Arabs of Gaza to do the same.

2) For Egypt, based on an agreement with Israel, to assume control and in time incorporate Gaza, and for Jordan to do the very same thing in most of the "West Bank".

Israel simply can not afford to take the risk of enabling an Iranian led country that calls for the erasing the Jewish state off the face of the earth and with it its people and its Jewish civilization from this Jewish national homeland.

Note, the leaders of the Palestinian Authority to this very day, refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist.....!!!

writeon
12 January 2009 at 16:41

Amihai,

The invasion of Gaza was primarily a political not a military decision. The politicians used the attack on Gaza as a cynical election ploy. Something's wrong when war becomes part of a democracy's election culture, democracy is tainted.

The gamble of invading Gaza is back-firing, yet the politicians have to pretend they have won and defeated Hamas, even when everyone knows Hamas hasn't been defeated. That so many people, on both sides, have to die for such a grotesque farce, is tragic.

If Israel, Eygypt and Jordan take over all of historic Palestine, what happens to the rights of the Palestinians? Egypt and Jordan are both military dictatorships, run by corrupt, secular, dynasties. How likely is it that the Palestinians would accept such a perverse idea`?

Israel cannot dictate the peace terms to the Palestinians. It can try, but it won't succeed. It will have the opposite effect.

Israel cannot keep killing Palestinians in such large numbers and survive in the Middle East as a viable state. The killing, on both sides, has to stop, somehow.

Why is Hamas popular? Hamas is popular because it's a 'successful' resistance movement, unlike the regimes in Egypt and Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, which have surrendered. All of these regimes are extremely unpopular, which is why they don't dare allow free elections. But this is making them increasingly unstable, as these countries move inexorably towards a tremendous social explosion.

No country has a 'right' to exist. They either exist or they don't. Obviously Israel exists,and that will have to suffice. Israel's existance is based on the non-existance of Palestine. Israel took over the place on the map that Palestine was wiped off of. It's these unpleasant realities that Israel refuses to acknowledge, these Palestinian rights.

Amihai
12 January 2009 at 17:13

Since once again the present conflict in Gaza is entering the discussion as it is unfolding on the ground, I wish to share the following with readers/posters:

Persistent reports tell of Hamas's leaders hiding in the basement of the Shifa Hospital of Gaza, using the civilians in this medical facility as human shields, a form of war crime.

Also, similar reports, based on photo documentation, accuse Hamas's armed forces of stockpiling weapons and explosives in mosques, in schools and in people's homes and firing them from schoolyards and the yards of medical facilities, which also amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity.

And of course, Hamas's exclusive targets for many years have been population canters in Israel – the blue colour towns of S'derot, Ashqelon, the universities in Beer Sheba and Sapir, and the collective and cooperative farming communities and their residents, of southern Israel - also considered war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Israel has been seeking an accommodation of peaceful co-existence with its Arab neighbours, in Gaza and elsewhere. But Israel, as any other country, can not permit its citizens to be targeted day in and day out, especially when the declared goal of the attackers is to erase the Jewish state of Israel – a UN member state – off the face of the earth and with it the Jewish civilization in this national homeland of the Jewish people (read Hamas's Charter!!!).

At present, Hamas must loose its will and motivation to fire at Israel and Israelis, and most of the means with which it conducts its war machine against Israel's civilian population must be eliminated. In addition, all illicit weapons and explosives must cease from making their way into Gaza. And of course, without Gilad Shalit coming back home this conflict will not come to an end.

On a longer term, the demand of the UN, EU, US, Russia as well as Arab states and the Palestinian Authority presidency of Hamas must stand if it (Hamas) wishes to be part of any peace process: Cease all acts of terror and violence against Israel and Israelis and the preparations for such acts, adhere to previously signed agreements with Israel, and recognize Israel's right – a UN member state – to exist.

Israelis have never sought anything beyond an accommodation of peaceful co-existence between Arab and Jew, between Israel and its Arab neighbors.

Can Israel's neighbors rise to the occasion and seek the same goal??

Pencils
12 January 2009 at 17:32

Writeon - I don't know why you bother arguing with these people, but fair play to you - 10 out of 10 for stamina.

Amihai
13 January 2009 at 05:39

Hamas on Monday raided some 100 aid trucks that Israel had allowed into Gaza, stole their contents and sold them to the highest bidders.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1231424932109&pag...

writeon
13 January 2009 at 10:13

Pencils,

I don't know either. It isn't really a debate. I't more like a war of words, a pathetic parallel to what's happening on the real battlefield.

I spend a lot of time writing stuff which I get paid a lot of money for. I have time and resources. I don't have and employer. I am my own boss. Through my agent I've already sold the outline of my lastest work for 'development' into a movie. That's at least five years covered finacially. Over the last fifteen years I've sold five manuscripts like this, none ever reached the screen, but I did very well out of the process.

I suppose I'm a romantic at heart. I feel like a knight who is obliged by honour to defend the oppressed and downtrodden. Maybe it's about elementary concepts of justice and right and wrong. Can one really just turn ones head away and enjoy life when there is so much suffering? I find it hard to ignore. So I don my armour, pick up my sword and go to battle with the forces of darkness creeping up on us.

Pencils
13 January 2009 at 11:16

Right on, writeon!

gez pearce
13 January 2009 at 20:22

Would a NATO led peace keeping force be acceptable to both sides.

To patrol the borders

writeon
13 January 2009 at 21:35

Gez,

No, it wouldn't be acceptable to both sides, though some neutral force would be a good idea, a start. However, which side of the 'border' would it be on? I don't know about the Palestinians, but Israel has refused to contemplate foreign troops stationed on its side as this, it is argued, would compromise its sovereignty. Perhaps, more importantly, it would probably protect the Palestinians to well and make attacking them harder.

ikotubo
17 January 2009 at 00:59

With articles such as this, does it really surprise anyone that Israeli rulers (and the shameless apologists for their barbaric atrocities) continue to present their crimes as a "conflict" between them and their helpless Palestinian victims? How can anyone talk about "searching" for peace, as if we don't already know what the solution is, and when the entire world knows who has been frustrating every effort aimed at achieving it - namely, the Israelis? Why is the world so afraid of this demonic and cancerous entity?

Jsare
17 January 2009 at 18:11

As author of the article I would not usually wish to add a comment. However, I have just learnt the Dr Ezzaldeen (Abu Al-Aish) quoted in the penultimate para just lost his three daughters. They were all killed last night when an Israeli tank shell hit their home in Jabaliya northern Gaza.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=x4Z93nPctrQ

Rest in peace now.

Jsare
17 January 2009 at 18:23

As author of this article I would not usually wish to add to the comments. But I just learnt the Dr quoted in the penultimate para (Ezzedinebu Al-Aish) lost all three of his daughters yesterday. They were killed when an Israeli tank shell struck their home in Jabiliya northern Gaza. The ceasefire is imminent but too late for Dr Al-Aish.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=x4Z93nPctrQ

Rest in peace now.

writeon
17 January 2009 at 21:33

Jsare,

Tragic news, more futile and criminal waste. How does one live with such pain? I keep looking at my girls and thinking... how would I react in the same situation? The needless and senseless slaughter of so many childre, women and teenagers, in a totally onesided battle, one can't really call it a war, seems to defy our normal concepts of morality, even in modern warfare.

We seem to be moving backwards in time even though our technology moves forward. It's like we are regressing on the evolutionary scale towards the apeman, but our destructive capcity is increasing. I wonder if this is just coincidence?

During the assault on the Warsaw Ghetto, where a lightly armed militia took on the might of the German Army, in the distance, not too far away, was the Russian army. For decades historians have debated why they did nothing to help the fighters in the Ghetto and let them be destroyed. History has not been kind to the Russians.

But what about us in the West? We are standing by and watching calmly, or at least most of our political leaders are, as one of the world's strongest armies destroys Gaza and slaughters its people and nobody lifts a fingure to help them, or defend them. In fact we think of ways to disarm them so they can't even defend themselves when they are attacked. Not only that we are actively supporting and arming the powrful army that's launched an offensive against them. It's almost like we're supporting the Nazis who are attacking the Warsaw Ghetto, which is far worse than the inaction of the Russians.

So we in the West are actually complicit in the perpetration of terrible and blatantly obvious warcrimes being enacted in Gaza in front of our eyes. How is this possible in countries that like to consider themselves shining examples of democracy? What kind of people are we becoming, what kind of culture, when we allow such crimes to be committed in our name?

writeon
18 January 2009 at 13:26

Jsare,

Yes, this is horror piled opon horror. It's a pity you won't be able to read my other comment as it's been censored away, turned away, like it never really happened at all. Like the silent murders of these children.

writeon
18 January 2009 at 13:32

Here's an riddle, a piece of infamy. How many dead Palestinian children does it take to get oneself election to the Israeli parliament? Send your answers to Tzipi Livni care of the Knesset.

Mojitolady
20 January 2009 at 21:59

I am very much a layperson re the politics of the middle east, but I enjoyed reading about Creativity for Peace and the comments re the same. I sense the frustration and compassion the contributors all have, whatever their view and am intrigued sufficiently to want to understand more from all sides involved. Can anyone recommend some reading ( not too heavy please ! ).

ikotubo
21 January 2009 at 10:55

Mojitolady: There are two materials I'd personally recommend, which are genuinely impartial but equally insightful. And, in terms of their accessibility, all I'd say is that if I could read them, almost anyone else can:

1) Andrew Cockburn and Leslie Cockburn, Dangerous Liaison: The Inside Story of the US-Israeli Covert Relationship, Harper-Perennial, 1992, ISBN-13: 978-0060921453

Although somewhat dated, this should place most events in the region in context for you, and, hopefully, debunk most of the fallacious myths about Israel's policy towards its neighbours since its creation. It also explains, with much insight, the role played by the United States and why it is such an uncritical supporter of Israel. It's also quite authoritative because some of what they say are based on their interviews with Israeli leaders.

2) I also strongly recommend: The Israel Lobby, by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html

This is a balanced and very nuanced (some would say balanced and nuanced to a fault) critical assessment of the situation in the area by two very eminent scholars, and has enjoyed international acclaim. It is more of a scholarly critique that my first recommendation, and so does seem heavy at first sight; but really isn't. Trust me!

Hope this helps, at any rate.

Mojitolady
21 January 2009 at 20:17

Ikutubo

thank you very much for the recommendations - I go on holiday soon and need some interesting mateial to read other than escapism novels !

I did actually visit Israel in the 80's and spent a few months there - working alongside all people.I was only interested in seeing the culture at that time and I have to say that I only knew warmth and was very welcomed by all and I guess this is partly where the interest stems from - but also, as many others have already stated, the destruction is all so futile. I would hope that any knowledge and understanding I can gain might help me make a little sense of it all.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker