Registered user login:

Aid in a crisis

Annie Philip

Published 03 October 2008

Rich Western nations are urged to stick with the UN Millennium development goals inspite of the turbulence in the global economy.

In the midst of the global financial meltdown, world leaders met last week to review the progress of the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

These are intended to reduce extreme global poverty and, improve health and education. A report released prior to the meeting found that development aid needed to increase by $18 billion each year between 2008 and 2010 to meet the Official Development Assistance (ODA) pledge by developed countries towards fulfilling the goals.

Interestingly at the end of the event, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon announced that an additional $16 billion had been pledged by governments and non governmental bodies in aid in the attempt to meet the targets of the MDGs by its deadline of 2015. Mr Ban Ki-moon called it 'remarkable' that the pledge came in the background of the global financial crisis. In fact, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown in his address to the UN, went on to say that the financial crisis should not be an excuse to cut aid.

So if countries are willing to donate despite the current meltdown and pledges of commitment are being made at regular intervals, what explains the large gap of $31.4 billion of ODA (according to the Report of the MDG Gap Task Force) when we're more than halfway to the deadline?

We put these questions to Minar Pimple, Deputy Director of the UN Millennium Campaign, Asia, and Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem, Deputy Director of the UN Millennium Campaign, Africa.

When asked if the current global financial meltdown might affect aid towards the MDGs, Pimple said there is no direct correlation between aid and the financial crisis. He said US$16 billion paled in comparison towards the proposed US financial bail out plan of $700 billion to help Wall Street.

He stressed that the global financial crisis needs to be discussed independent of aid towards MDG commitments. It was the responsibility of each individual country to deliver on the goals regardless of political difficulties.

At the recent UN event on MDGs, General Assembly President Miguel D’Escoto pointed out that “the amount spent so far on the Iraq war could have paid for a full course of primary schooling for all of the world’s children and youth who are not in school. The price of a single missile is enough to build about 100 schools in any country in Africa, Asia or Latin America.”

Abdul-Raheem made the point that even without the financial crisis, commitments to the MDGs had not been met.

When asked why commitments towards aid remained unfulfilled, Pimple said that till the ODA (commitment to donate 0.7% of GNI) became a political issue, gaps would remain. Governments, he said, can give unsubstantiated reasons to fall short on their commitments, but it is really up to the political establishment to act. Giving the example of Australia, he said the change of leadership has already meant substantial improvements towards climate change and aid efforts. In this respect, civil society also has an important role to play in pressurising governments to uphold their commitments and he mentioned UK and Spain, where citizens pushed their respective governments to act.

Abdul-Raheem questioned why rich, larger countries of Europe could not meet their commitment towards MDGs if smaller Scandinavian countries, especially Norway was able to keep its promises. He also said that it was the duty of citizens to hold governments accountable on the MDGs as the goals are a commitment by governments to the people of the world.

Citizens of Africa and Asia meanwhile had to ensure their leaders met targes such as reduction of poverty, improvement of education and health, while citizens of the developed world had to ensure their governments stuck to their commitments - including delivering the right quantity and quality of aid.

Just as much as aid dependence needs to be tackled, both Pimple and Abdul-Raheem agreed that establishing fair trade was integral to aid. Aid, after all cannot be independent of justice.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

sweety
06 October 2008 at 02:24

You are out of tiny little mind! We should live a country where the poor people who cannot get the medicine from the NHS. should be able to prosecute Hilary Benn. I jest not! He shoudlbe in jail. His words and and the supplying of millions to Olympic Brand , Space walking China beggars belief. Cameron should make a lot of this, the coming election. Your ilk who rode roughshod over our people's generosity for decades do not realize how close to the edge they are!

sweety
06 October 2008 at 02:26

At the recent UN event on MDGs, General Assembly President Miguel D’Escoto pointed out that “the amount spent so far on the Iraq war could have paid for a full course of primary schooling for all of the world’s children and youth who are not in school. The price of a single missile is enough to build about 100 schools in any country in Africa, Asia or Latin American

Yes tell this well paid UN. clone we already know this but all he has to do is to convince the North Koreans, Iranians , Indians et.al. and keep collecting his bakseesh!

ikotubo
09 October 2008 at 09:50

Why is any debate on Africa ALWAYS about how much aid should be given, rather than whether what has been given so far has served any useful purpose beyond absolving the region’s rulers of their basic responsibilities towards our longsuffering people? Are we really to assume that Africa was somehow predestined to be eternally aid-dependent? Really?

sweety
15 October 2008 at 02:36

Are we really to assume that Africa was somehow predestined to be eternally aid-dependent? Really?

Yes and yes!

ikotubo
15 October 2008 at 14:42

To Sweety: I really don't blame you for the answers you've given. If I were not African myself, I'd probably offer the same answers, not least because of how African rulers have conducted themselves since independence.

I don't suppose people with your kind of beliefs are capable of being objective, but let me say this, nonetheless: Very few "ordinary" Africans wish to be aid-dependent. On the contrary, we are a self-sufficient and resourceful people whose basic needs and aspirations are constantly undermined by rulers addicted to Western aid. We just want to be left alone to get on with our lives.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the third runway at Heathrow go ahead?