Eyes on Nasrallah

Dr Imad Salamey

Published 19 November 2007

The Hezbollah leader is surprisingly media savvy, using television to exert his global influence from a Beirut hideout.

Shi’a leader and Hezbollah General Secretary Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is Lebanon’s one of the most popular leaders. Since last summer’s Hezbollah-Israeli confrontation in Southern Lebanon Nasrallah has taken cover in a 'mystical' hideout, believed to be somewhere in the southern suburbs of Beirut.

However, this has not prevented the leader from repeated TV appearances with the aim of reassuring militant followers of his resolve in realising a godly victory over the 'infidels'. Streets in Beirut and elsewhere in the country become deserted as people gather around screens in anticipation of the Sayyed’s live message.

Whether you support or oppose the man you have to listen to him. After all, his televised appearances can swing both national and regional political moods. Hezbollah fighters under his command in the South are ready to unleash rocket attacks against Israeli towns and cities.

Nasrallah has declared in his live messages to be in possession of over 20,000 short and medium range missiles, placing Tel Aviv and even its nuclear facilities in Negev within rocket range.

These proclamations have alarmed Israel, prompting its army to carry out unprecedented military exercises on the Lebanese borders involving over 50,000 soldiers. A possible confrontation with Hezbollah would place approximately 15,000 UNIFIL soldiers positioned on the borders in the line of fire. The situation has disturbed the international community as soldiers from the UNIFIL coalition of European, Asian and African nations continue to be stationed in Hezbollah controlled territories.

In his furious televised speeches Nasrallah has pledged to bring an end to the chronic historical sense of Arab and Islamic humiliation and the “beginning of a victorious epoch”; a slogan displayed on giant banners all over Shi’a strongholds. Such statements have been echoed by Iranian President Mahmood Ahmadinejad, an ally of Nasrallah.

Many believe that a confrontation with Israel, instigated by Hezbollah, would drag Syria and Iran into the conflict. Some observers are suggesting that the prospect of an Iranian-Syrian-Hamas-Hezbollah axis of influence in the region would be so concerning to Egypt, Jordan and other pro-western Sunni Arab regimes that they may even favour an Israeli victory in any future conflict.

It is not only Israelis watching Nasrallah’s defiant televised speeches with apprehension; his Lebanese rivals are also glued to the screens when the Sayyed addresses his audience. Downtown Beirut, rebuilt from rubble after the 1975 Lebanese Civil War and earmarked as a Mecca for tourism and business, has become a deserted ghost town after a year long anti-government public sit-in called for by Nasrallah.

His opponents fear that domestic differences over the country’s presidential elections and Hezbollah’s possession of a vast cache of weapons beyond government control may signal an all out domestic confrontation and the spread of civil unrest.

Everyone awaits the “Nasrallah’s televised password” that sets the public mood of either optimism or pessimism over the country’s future. His messages instigate public reactions with his charged supporters taking to the streets, obstructing traffic with roadblocks, enforcing unofficial curfews, or simply engaging in mass celebrations.

The Hezbollah leader's television audience is global. The sizeable Lebanese diasporic communities who have invested in the country, awaiting permanent or temporary return or concerned over the safety of their relatives, are eager to watch from continents across the world. Sympathizers among the Lebanese-Americans in the U.S. city of Dearborn, Michigan, a Lebanese Shi’a enclave, gather in large groups in homes and local restaurants to listen attentively to the leader's messages.

However, Nasrallah is most closely watched in Syria. Since the assassination of anti-Syrian former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri in February 2005, a plot widely believed to have been orchestrated by the Syrian regime, Nasrallah has managed to undermine the authenticity of both the investigation and the formation of an international tribunal court.

In November 2006 Nasrallah instructed Shi’a government ministers to withdraw from the cabinet in protest of the government's approval of the formation of an international tribunal court, leading the country into one of its deepest national crises since independence.

Syria, fearing international indictment and condemnation, has rushed to Nasrallah’s defence in order to quell suspicions. In turn Nasrallah has poured scorn upon both the investigation and the court, labelling both as part of a U.S.-Zionist ploy against Syria and Lebanon.

He went as far as presupposing that any future allegations against the Syrian regime will only be faced with street confrontation and opposition. For the Syrian regime, Nasrallah has emerged as an important player in rebuffing attacks against Syria and in helping reposition its strategic role in the region while simultaneously strengthening its critical alliance with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

For the time being Nasrallah remains in his hideout, adding suspense to his TV appearances that bring him closer to millions of adherents and rivals around the globe. With many important cards in his hand, Nasrallah has emerged as a master tactician in the political arena. In the mean time, the world watches in anticipation over his next move.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

Rachel Wisemann
19 November 2007 at 17:43

I can't believe that Nasrallah has this much power in regional politics - he is the leader of a terrorist organisation and should be treated as such.

moe11
19 November 2007 at 18:07

actually no, he is a leader of a ressistance, a group devoted to protecting lebanon, he even said in his speech, even the enemy shoots at you, dont shoot back, stay peaceful, all he wants is the lebanese out of isreali dungons, and all lebanese land back to lebanon, then israel doesnt have to worry about hezbollah, because it has done what it needed to do. restore and protect lebanon. by far, the smartest, and greatest man in our time.

Sheikh Nasrallah
19 November 2007 at 19:03

Bias against Hezbollah is clear in this rubbish article.

One can't see any main thought behind the artcile;

is it to slander him that he will drag Lebanon to another conflict on the 'orders' of his 'masters'?

or, this American University's popinjay 'professor' and 'expert' is using NS pages to tell that poor old israel is again facing 'existential threat' (i love this phrase) by two thousand (according to 'israeli and western estimates') irregualr guerillas 'again')? Read his sentences:

"Hezbollah fighters under his command in the South are ready to unleash rocket attacks against Israeli towns and cities.

(read amnesty international and HRW reports on who targetted civilains most)

"Nasrallah has declared in his live messages to be in possession of over 20,000 short and medium range missiles, placing Tel Aviv and even its nuclear facilities in Negev within rocket range.

These proclamations have alarmed Israel, prompting its army to carry out unprecedented military exercises on the Lebanese borders involving over 50,000 soldiers.

(so, according to this Lebanese 'professor', like most in the West, israel 'retaliates' not 'initiates').

And then the same line:

"Many believe that a confrontation with Israel, instigated by Hezbollah, would drag Syria and Iran into the conflic

(so, Hezbollah always instigates).

Then all other rubbish about Nasrallah wanting to instigate a civil war, an agent of Iran and Syria, etc. etc.

Shame on NS for publishing this wotrthless piece. Even a profile about Paris Hilton could have been tolerable in its place.

freedomasters
19 November 2007 at 23:08

mr nasrallah may be media savvy, but anyone with 20000 rockets and the full force and capabilities of iran and syria behind him will definitely get the attention of any listener concerned about lebanon, hizballas hostage nation.

it is evident that nasrallah is the media face of others outside lebanon whose only goal is conquering territory . they have no agenda whatsoever other than the usual conquer and loot. it is known that the southern subburb of beirut is nothing but illegaly confiscated land. and what they cant get by force, they buy with irans petromoney . and with this unholy money they brainwash and buy the souls of impoverished or illiterate masses by providing some services after they crippled and looted the government of its resources by refusing to pay taxes and muscling their way to looting the electric and other utility services while the rest of the population pays taxes and electricity bills at inflated rates.

it is a tragedy that a militia with little concern for anything other than total hegemony has been created by the syrian colonization over the last 40 years and fully funded by iran and global rackets mafia style is now holding all of Lebanon at knife point.

ignorant bystanders are not aware how this basically foreign militia has over the decades systematically indoctrinated newer generations of lebanese shiites with the khomeini based hatred for anything that is civilized or western or different than itself. of course having billions of takeover dollars and millions of weapons at your disposal definitely makes this sinister takeover mission much easier.

it is time for the world to start understanding this sinister conspiracy starting in iran through southern iraq syria and now lebanon, not to mention gaza. it is a vicious power play that trancends shia and sunni differences and seems to be of imperialistic if not global proportion. it is still embryonic at this time but it is coming , unless everyone wakes up

Michaelk
20 November 2007 at 02:52

freedomasters,

"they have no agenda whatsoever other than the usual conquer and loot"

I think you are confusing Hezbollah with Israel. Read Amnesty reports, read HRW reports. The facts are there. But you won't acknowledge these facts because Jews might call you anti-semitic.

"southern subburb of beirut is nothing but illegaly confiscated land"

No, no. See it used to be when the Israelis were there, but in 2000 Hezbollah kicked them out. Just to clarify.

"it is time for the world to start understanding this sinister conspiracy starting in iran through southern iraq syria and now lebanon"

Let me rephrase your quote above for you:

"it is time for the world to start understanding this sinister conspiracy starting in through to "

See, now that's a more accurate description of what is happening :-)

"it is a tragedy that a militia with little concern for anything other than total hegemony"

Wrong again, I'm sorry. Total hegemony? That would be the US and Israel, not Hezbollah. Hezbollah's main aim was to batter the Israelis in Southern Lebanon. They did that and now they're gone. Their goal now is to secure release of Lebanese prisoners and stop Israel's voilation of Lebanon's air and sea space and military aggression.

For more info, please see www.lebanon-israel.info.

From Lebanon
20 November 2007 at 08:55

As a Lebanese, I find myself glued to the TV screen every time Sayyed Nasrrallah is about to give a speech. Why? Obviously because to every one

in the country Nassrallah's speech can change the course of events in the region. Sayyed Nasrrallah himself rejects being labeled as an innocent

leader reacting to events (or to be playing the victim role), whether by Israel or by his domestic opponents. On the contrary, he has insisted to publicly reveal his procession of significant pile of strategic weapons

ready to be unleashed on Northern Israel in any future confrontation, reaching the point of what he calls ±beyond-beyond Hayfa½. He has repeatedly announced that from this point on he [Hezbollah] will be taken the initiative. Nasrrallah has announced many similar statements within the strategy of what he calls a ±psychological warfare½ with the enemy. So, I

donφt see what is bias about the article.

I have no doubt that civilian casualties of Israeli bombardments by far exceed any retaliated acts by Hezbollah, but it is naﻡve to think that Israel is the sole initiator of conflict in the region. As for the Hezbollah-Hammas-Syrian-Iranian link, I no think that this matter is a secret to anyone. Sayyed Nasrrallah in his many televised addresses expressed proud of this alliance with Syria, Hammas, and Iran against the

Western axis of evil. Nor it is a secret that over .5 billion U.S. dollars announced on TV by Nasrrallah to have been distributed on victims of Israeli

bombardment to be anything but Iranian money. Hezbollah's other internal domestic role, again I donφt believe anyone in the country doubt including

Sayyed Nasrrallah himself, that it is fundamentally linked with other

regional issues and interests, particularly that of Syria's possible indictment in the Harriri assassination. I found the article "Eyes on

Nasrrallah" informative and highlights various important political aspects of Nasrrallah's TV appearances, I applaud NS for publishing it.

Mashmammad
20 November 2007 at 11:36

Israel the father of Rachel Wisemann, has introduced terrorism for the first time in the Middle East in 1940s. Rachel Wisemann is in no position to denounce Hezbolah and its leader for fighting against the Israeli genocide and its state terrorism.

Michaelk
22 November 2007 at 02:30

FromLebanon,

So what is your point, that the article is not bias? Well, mayeb you think so but I don't. The article is weak - what's the point of it? That Nasrallah instigates conflict?

Why dont you tackle the real issues about Nasrallah and his cause and why he says and does the things he does?

Weapons? Of course he wants weapons. How else do you fight a murderous regime like Israel? Diplomacy, by being civil, being peaceful protests? Get real. And now you ask, but why do I want to fight Israel? Well, human rights - because they deny basic human rights to surrounding countries in the region. They occupy Lebanon, Syria and Palestine and ask "what wrong have we done"? Cmon, is this a joke? They voilate Lebanese and Syrian airspace and test their bombs out and then ask "why do you hate us"?

Iranian money, help from Syria.....is that a bad thing? Should we scold Iran and Syria for the finances they have provided to help rebuild Lebanon? This is laughable.

Why don't you address the real issues rather than hate Nasrallah because he wears a turbin and isn't as Westernised as you?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Dr Imad Salamey

Imad Salamey is a specialist in Middle Eastern studies, particularly in the areas of democracy and governance and ethnic conflict transformation. He is currently the assistant professor of political science and international affairs at the Lebanese American University, Beirut.

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker