Return to: Home | Culture | Ideas

In God we trust?

Robert Ilson

Published 17 April 2008

We are at the mercy of God's whim, say Old Testament stories.

The most awful story in the world may well be the tale of Cain and Abel. In the Bible (Genesis 4), both Cain and his brother Abel offer sacrifices to God. Cain offers plants; Abel presents animals. "And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering; but unto Cain and to his offering He had not respect."

Why? We are not told. But the answer is implicit in that silence: God can do what He likes; ours is not to question why. We must simply accept what God has ordained. Of course, commentators have sought to sanitise the tale not by explaining it, but by explaining it away. The most typical commentary is that Cain harboured unworthy thoughts even before his offering was rejected. But that is not in the text. The text offers us a God completely arbitrary in His whims; a God who does not acknowledge any moral standards for Himself. So, is it any wonder that "Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell" - or that "Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him"?

This is the God of the Bible: the God who later (Genesis 22) will test Abraham by ordering him to kill his son Isaac (or, in Muslim versions, his son Ishmael), and who spares Isaac/Ishmael only after Abraham shows his willingness to kill his son in God's name. That is perhaps the second most awful story in the world.

The reason the story of Cain and Abel is still worse is that it shows that even the kind of corpse-like obedience (Kadavergehorsam in German) which the God of the Old Testament demands from Abraham may not suffice to placate Him. Cain's sacrifice was at least as good as Abel's; better, indeed, if you don't like sacrificing animals. But Yahweh decided to show He was God by saying no to Cain and yes to Abel - thus indirectly causing Abel's death. Yahweh may make rules of morality for us - but need not obey them Himself. He not only has a giant's strength (which Shakespeare reminds us is excellent) but uses it like a giant (which Shakespeare reminds us is tyrannous). Yahweh's motto with respect to power is: If you've got it, flaunt it.

Those who continue to believe in God may, should they meet Him after they die, be in for a nasty shock if He chooses to flaunt his power by damning them anyway - just to show He can. In such circumstances, it is perhaps imprudent to take too seriously the national motto of the United States, which appears on that country's banknotes: In God We Trust. We might do better to trust our own conscience and hope for the best - but take nothing for granted.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

joseph_schmeltzer
25 April 2008 at 00:07

There are, in fact, answers to all of the questions posed by the author of this article entitled, "In God We Trust?" I want to make it clear first: these answers are sealed and cannot be understood unless the spirit (which is in you) allows it. That said, you be the judge as to whether these things make sense:

1. The reason that Yahweh did not accept Cain's offering was that he offered yield from the ground. It was purposed, prophesied, and fulfilled that Yahshua the Messiah would be the "first fruits of them that slept" and he offered himself through the eternal spirit to the Father, Yahweh. Deut. 6:4 Hear O Isreal: Yahweh our Elohim is Yahweh a Unity. Yahshua's very name meant Yahweh is salvation. Cain's offering was out of time/season.

2. "Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell" -"Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him"? Yes, well he murdered Abel, didn't he? And for what? Because Abel's offering was accepted and Cain's was not. You can't read it but Abel actually offered for Cain to take one of Abel's for an offering unto Yahweh. Cain chose murder.

3. Regarding Abraham, Yahweh promised him a son and made good on it. Isaac was borne of Abraham and Sarah. Yes, Yahweh (known to Abraham as El Shaddai) did request Abraham offer Isaac. Abraham counted that Yahweh was faithful to deliver; i.e., raise Isaac from the dead, as evidenced by the statement Abraham made: "Tarry here until we return." We. Abraham had faith in Yahweh and exercised it. Angel of Yahweh stayed his hand via a ram caught in the thicket. This event was a prefigure of Yahshua the Messiah who would be subjected to fulfill the law and the prophets according to the purpose of Yahweh, and then offered as a living sacrifice: he redeemed his bride back unto himself (again), caused angel and humankind to be as one, and accomplished salvation.

May Yahweh our Elohim in Yahshua the Messiah continue to bless and keep you always.

Love,

Joseph

http://www.ayahasherayah.org

JGuerra757
13 April 2009 at 07:39

The way the passages have been read by the author of this article are a little, how can one say, "tunneled". For lack of a better word.

First off, in Genesis 4:3-4 it is said, "3. And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD.

4. And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: " It can be read that Abel spent time to find the firtlings of the flock, and made sure that it was a robust one as well. Whereas it does not state that Cain took this much care in his offering unto the Lord.

The Lord even tells Cain that if he is to do what is right, then sin and evil shall not befall unto him. # And the LORD said unto Cain, "6. Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?

7. If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him."

And as for Abraham, it was a test form the Lord, on his faith. Abraham knew the Lord would come through. He had promised Issac a wife as well. And Issac was the promised son to Abraham. Simple. When an article like this, the basis should be read more into depth.

May God bless you and your loved ones.

Javier

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker