Registered user login:

How ministers ignored the 'time bomb' in the classroom

Ed Howker

Published 28 August 2008

Concerns about asbestos in schools were first voiced in the 1960s yet 13,000 schools today still contain the substance

Editor's Note: Leigh Carlisle died on 27 August as the magazine was going to press.

Leigh Carlisle is 28. Doctors and lawyers have not yet established how she was exposed to asbestos or why she is dying of mesothelioma at such a young age. The aggressive cancer often takes 20 years or more to reveal itself after exposure.

They consider it possible that she was affected at school in Oldham and have placed a Freedom of Information request with the council there, hoping to determine whether there was asbestos in her classrooms.

They are waiting to discover if Leigh's name will be added to around 200 school workers who are dead or dying of mesothelioma as a result of the widespread use of the mineral in school building projects during the second half of the 20th century. About 13,000 schools today contain asbestos.

As early as 1967, the Department of Education and Science was concerned about the dangers of asbestos in schools but bowed to pressure from the asbestos industry to continue using its products. Correspondence between the department and the industry illustrates just how much power the asbestos firms had. In July 1967, when the schools building programme was in full flow, the DES published a memorandum advertising the risk of mesothelioma posed by asbestos and urging local authorities to "reduce the use of all forms of asbestos by finding a substitute wherever possible".

One month later the department received a letter written jointly by directors of Cape Asbestos and Turner & Newall which stated: "We have seen this memorandum and have come to the conclusion that it is intended to cover the use of asbestos by students in laboratories."

It went on to warn of the "enormous economic consequences" of interpreting the memorandum more widely. Under pressure from the Board of Trade, the DES relented, confirming that it would "define the scope of the memorandum" as suggested by the asbestos firms.

Today, 40 years on, the National Union of Teachers describes the issue of asbestos in schools as a "ticking time bomb".

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Concerned Teacher
28 August 2008 at 14:22

As someone who has taught in a number of schools I am shocked to read that the government knew about the danger of asbestos in schools in the 1960s.

I have seen a lot of damaged material in schools. I've even been told not to worry as it was the "safe" asbestos.

My heart goes out to the familiy of this young woman who has died aged only 28.

To be born in the same year that Cyril Smith MP was asking an asbestos company to write his parliamentary speeches is nothing less than a scandal. I didn't realise he was still alive. He must have a lot of soul searching to do. But then again, politicians are usually self-seeking opportunists who will accept their 30 peices of silver without much regard for the electorate.

Perhaps Mr Smith and T&N should foot the bill for the damage they have caused.

David Fallis
31 August 2008 at 12:22

your article on asbestos is misleading in that it does not explain that their are several types of asbestos :

1.iron silicate which includes crocidolite and amosite (blue and brown asbestos) both of which cause mesothelioma when inhaled.These fibres are sharp and acid resistant and cannot be removed or disolved when in the lungs.

2. magnesium silicate which includes chrysotile (white asbestos ) whose fibres are smooth and are not resistant to acid attackand consequently not retained in the lungs.

A paper (J.Hodgson/A.Darnton) issued by the HSE in 2000 states that blue asbestos is 500 times more dangerous than white asbestos and brown asbestos is 300 times more dangerous than white asbestos .

As asbestos has to be inhaled to cause mesothelioma and white asbestos used in solid form the risk to health is neglible.

RichardWilson
04 September 2008 at 12:01

I sometimes wonder how the person calling himself "David Fallis" can sleep at night. What a truly tasteless moment he has chosen to repeat his bogus claims about the health risks of white asbestos being "negible". It must be great to be an asbestos pseudo-scientist. You need never do any actual research of your own - you can simply make it up off the top of your head, and then mix in some misleading claims about the conclusions drawn by real scientists like Hodgson and Darnton...

Readers can see for themselves the response to "David Fallis"

RichardWilson
04 September 2008 at 12:02

...from Trevor Ogden on this article here: http://www.newstatesman.com/health/2008/08/asbestos-victims-...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by Ed Howker

Read More

Vote!

Should the third runway at Heathrow go ahead?