The war on democracy

From the Chagos Islands to Pakistan, innocent civilians are pawns to America, backed by Britain. In

Lisette Talate died the other day. I remember a wiry, fiercely intelligent woman who masked her grief with a determination that was a presence. She was the embodiment of people's resistance to the war on democracy. I first glimpsed her in a 1950s Colonial Office film about the Chagos Islanders, a tiny creole nation living midway between Africa and Asia in the Indian Ocean. The camera panned across thriving villages, a church, a school, a hospital, set in phenomenal natural beauty and peace. Lisette remembers the producer saying to her and her teenage friends, "Keep smiling, girls!"

Sitting in her kitchen in Mauritius many years later, she said: "I didn't have to be told to smile. I was a happy child, because my roots were deep in the islands, my paradise. My great-grandmother was born there; I made six children there. That's why they couldn't legally throw us out of our own homes; they had to terrify us into leaving or force us out. At first, they tried to starve us. The food ships stopped arriving, [then] they spread rumours we would be bombed, then they turned on our dogs."

In the early 1960s, the Labour government of Harold Wilson secretly agreed to a demand from Washington that the Chagos archipelago, a British colony, be "swept" and "sanitised" of its 2,500 inhabitants so that a military base could be built on the principal island, Diego Garcia. "They knew we were inseparable from our pets," said Lisette. "When the American soldiers arrived to build the base, they backed their big trucks against the brick shed where we prepared the coconuts; hundreds of our dogs had been rounded up and imprisoned there. Then they gassed them through tubes from the trucks' exhausts. You could hear them crying."

Lisette, her family and hundreds of the other islanders were forced on to a rusting steamer bound for Mauritius, a journey of a thousand miles. They were made to sleep in the hold on a cargo of fertiliser - bird shit. The weather was rough; everyone was ill; two of the women on board miscarried.

Dumped on the docks at Port Louis, Lisette's youngest children, Jollice and Regis, died within a week of each other. "They died of sadness," she said. "They had heard all the talk and seen the horror of what had happened to the dogs. They knew they were leaving their home for ever. The doctor in Mauritius said he could not treat sadness."

This act of mass kidnapping was carried out in high secrecy. In one official file, under the heading "Maintaining the Fiction", the Foreign Office legal adviser exhorts his colleagues to cover their actions by "reclassifying" the population as "floating" and to "make up the rules as we go along". Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court says the "deportation or forcible transfer of population" is a crime against humanity. That Britain had committed such a crime - in exchange for a $14m discount off a US Polaris nuclear submarine - was not on the agenda of a group of British "defence" correspondents flown to the Chagos by the Ministry of Defence when the US base was completed. "There is nothing in our files," said the MoD, "about inhabitants or an evacuation."

Today, Diego Garcia is crucial to America's and Britain's war on democracy. The heaviest bombing of Iraq and Afghanistan was launched from its vast airstrips, beyond which the islanders' abandoned cemetery and church stand like archaeological ruins. The terraced garden where Lisette laughed for the camera is now a fortress housing the "bunker-busting" bombs carried by bat-shaped B-2 aircraft to targets on two continents; an attack on Iran will start here. As if to complete the emblem of rampant, criminal power, the CIA added a Guantanamo-style prison for its "rendition" victims and called it Camp Justice.

Wipe-out

What was done to Lisette's paradise has an urgent and universal meaning, for it represents the violent, ruthless nature of a whole political culture behind its democratic façade, and the scale of our own indoctrination in its messianic assumptions, described by Harold Pinter as a "brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis". Longer and bloodier than any other war since 1945, waged with demonic weapons and a gangsterism dressed as economic policy and sometimes known as globalisation, the war on democracy is unmentionable in western elite circles. As Pinter wrote, "It never happened . . . Even while it was happening it wasn't happening." Last July, the American historian William Blum published his updated "summary of the charming record of US foreign policy". Since the Second World War, the United States has:

1) Attempted to overthrow more than 50 governments, most of them democratically elected.
2) Attempted to suppress a populist or national movement in 20 countries.
3) Grossly interfered in democratic elections in at least 30 countries.
4) Dropped bombs on the people of more than 30 countries.
5) Attempted to assassinate more than 50 foreign leaders.

In total, the United States has carried out one or more of these actions in 69 countries. In almost all cases, Britain has been a collaborator. The "enemy" changes in name - from communism to Islamism - but mostly it is the rise of democracy independent of western power, or a society occupying strategically useful territory and deemed expendable, like the Chagos Islands.

The sheer scale of suffering, let alone criminality, is little known in the west, despite the presence of the world's most advanced communications, nominally freest journalism and most admired academy. That the most numerous victims of terrorism - western terrorism - are Muslims is unsayable, if it is known. That half a million Iraqi infants died in the 1990s as a result of the embargo imposed by Britain and America is of no interest. That extreme jihadism, which led to the 11 September 2001 attacks, was nurtured as a weapon of western policy (in "Operation Cyclone") is known to specialists, but otherwise suppressed.

While popular culture in Britain and America immerses the Second World War in an ethical bath for the victors, the holocausts arising from Anglo-American dominance of resource-rich regions are consigned to oblivion. Under the Indonesian tyrant Suharto, anointed "our man" by Margaret Thatcher, more than a million people were slaughtered in what the CIA described as "the worst mass murder of the second half of the 20th century". This estimate does not include the third of the population of East Timor who were starved or murdered with western connivance, British fighter-bombers and machine-guns.

These true stories are told in declassified files in the Public Record Office, yet represent an entire dimension of politics and the exercise of power excluded from public consideration. This has been achieved by a regime of uncoercive information control, from the evangelical mantra of advertising to soundbites on BBC news and now the ephemera of social media.

It is as if writers as watchdogs are extinct, or in thrall to a sociopathic zeitgeist, convinced they are too clever to be duped. Witness the stampede of sycophants eager to deify Christopher Hitchens, a war lover who longed to be allowed to justify the crimes of rapacious power. "For almost the first time in two centuries," wrote Terry Eagleton, "there is no eminent British poet, playwright or novelist prepared to question the foundations of the western way of life." No Orwell warns that we do not need to live in a totalitarian society to be corrupted by totalitarianism. No Shelley speaks for the poor, no Blake proffers a vision, no Wilde reminds us that "disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man's original virtue". And grievously no Pinter rages at the war machine, as in "American Football":

Hallelujah.
Praise the Lord for all good things . . .
We blew their balls into shards of dust,
Into shards of fucking dust . . .

Into shards of fucking dust go all the lives blown there by Barack Obama, the Hopey Changey of western violence. Whenever one of Obama's drones wipes out an entire family in a faraway tribal region of Pakistan, or Somalia, or Yemen, the American controllers sitting in front of their computer-game screens type in "Bugsplat". Obama likes drones and has joked about them with journalists. One of his first actions as president was to order a wave of Pre­dator drone attacks on Pakistan that killed 74 people. He has since killed thousands, mostly civilians; drones fire Hellfire missiles that suck the air out of the lungs of children and leave body parts festooned across scrubland.

Remember the tear-stained headlines as Brand Obama was elected: "Momentous, spine-tingling" (the Guardian). "The American future," Simon Schama wrote, "is all vision, numinous, unformed, light-headed with anticipation." The San Francisco Chronicle saw a spiritual "Lightworker . . . who can . . . usher in a new way of being on the planet". Beyond the drivel, as the great whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg had predicted, a military coup was taking place in Washington, and Obama was their man. Having seduced the anti-war movement into virtual silence, he has given America's corrupt military officer class unprecedented powers of state and engagement. These include the prospect of wars in Africa and opportunities for provocations against China, America's largest creditor and the new "enemy" in Asia. Under Obama, the old source of official paranoia, Russia, has been encircled with ballistic missiles and the Russian opposition infiltrated. Military and CIA assassination teams have been assigned to 120 countries; long-planned attacks on Syria and Iran beckon a world war. Israel, the exemplar of US violence and lawlessness by proxy, has just received its annual pocket money of $3bn together with Obama's permission to steal more Palestinian land.

Surveillance state

Obama's most "historic" achievement is to bring the war on democracy home to America. On New Year's Eve, he signed the National Defence Authorisation Act, a law that grants the Pentagon the legal right to kidnap both foreigners and US citizens secretly and indefinitely detain, interrogate and torture, or even kill them. They need only "associate" with those "belligerent" to the US. There will be no protection of law, no trial, no legal representation. This is the first explicit legislation to abolish habeas corpus (the right to due process of law) and, in effect, repeal the Bill of Rights of 1789.

On 5 January, in an extraordinary speech at the Pentagon, Obama said the military would not only be ready to "secure territory and populations" overseas but to fight in the "homeland" and "support [the] civil authorities". In other words, US troops are to be deployed on the streets of American cities when the inev­itable civil unrest takes hold.

America is now a land of epidemic poverty and barbaric prisons - the consequence of a "market" extremism that, under Obama, has prompted the transfer of $14trn in public money to criminal enterprises in Wall Street. The victims are mostly young, jobless, homeless, incarcerated African Americans, betrayed by the first black president. The historic corollary of a perpetual war state, this is not fascism, not yet, but neither is it democracy in any recognisable form, regardless of the placebo politics that will consume the news until November. The presidential campaign, says the Washington Post, will feature "a clash of phil­osophies rooted in distinctly different views of the economy". This is patently false. The circumscribed task of journalism on both sides of the Atlantic is to create the pretence of political choice where there is none.

The same shadow is across Britain and much of Europe, where social democracy, an article of faith two generations ago, has fallen to the central bank dictators. In David Cameron's "big society", the theft of £84bn in jobs and services exceeds even the amount of tax "legally" avoided by piratical corporations. Blame rests not with the far right, but with a cowardly liberal political culture that has allowed this to happen and which, as Hywel Williams wrote following the 9/11 attacks, "can itself be a form of self-righteous fanaticism". Tony Blair is one such fanatic. In its managerial indifference to the freedoms that it claimed to hold dear, bourgeois Blairite Britain created a surveillance state with 3,000 new criminal offences and laws: more than for the whole of the previous century. The police clearly believe they have an impunity to kill. At the demand of the CIA, cases like that of Binyam Mohamed, an innocent British resident tortured and then held for five years in Guantanamo Bay, will be dealt with in secret courts in Britain in order to "protect the intelligence agencies" - the torturers.

This invisible state allowed the Blair government to fight the Chagos Islanders as they rose from their despair in exile and demanded justice in the streets of Port Louis and London. "Only when you take direct action, face to face, even break laws, are you ever noticed," Lisette said. "And the smaller you are, the greater your example to others." Such is the eloquent answer to those who still ask, "What can I do?"

I last saw Lisette's tiny figure standing in driving rain next to her comrades outside the Houses of Parliament. What struck me was the enduring courage of their resistance. It is this refusal to give up that rotten power fears, above all, knowing it is the seed beneath the snow.

80 comments

ShaughanClovis's picture

Our entire political class has colluded with the Americans in the eradication of our basic rights and legal protections as British citizens. Hence....there is currently No Choice in British politics. Whoever you vote for, you will still be "rendered" if the Americans want you, and - if the aforementioned Bills are passed - you will still be tried without ever knowing what the evidence against you was. To my mind, this represents an unprecedented corruption of the British state. http://www.diyshedplans.org/

erasmus montanus's picture

words ,obama is the black prins ,he is here to liberate you,,but vil put you in chains----working aginst Pilger is blind blind stupidity ,,who is it ,,bombing people all over the world???the yanks,,buy the waj you now what yanks meens .also i ask myself whom are you working for???

Neander's picture

A typically overwrought article by John Pilger, presenting as always his Manichean view of the world. It is only the simpletons of both the radical left and the far-right who honestly think that the world is really as black and white as this. Simpletons and fanatics like John Pilger. His real regret all along is that the Marxist-Leninist ideology that he supports failed to take control of the world, stopped mainly by the USA, hence his visceral loathing for this admittedly flawed society. Now he and his associates on the radical left see Islam as a means of bringing down the civilisation of the West... they may well prove to be right. Pilger has no real interest in democracy. His goal has always been the destruction of that Western civilisation from which he has always felt himself a misfit and for which he has always had the most implacable loathing.

Hikaru22's picture

At no point in your diatribe against Pilger have you challenged a single line that he has written in this piece.

Hikaru22's picture

John Pilger:

'The circumscribed task of journalism on both sides of the Atlantic is to create the pretence of political choice where there is none.'

This is exactly how I feel about British politics in the wake of the UK/US Extradition Treaty, which was passed by a Labour government and is being maintained by a Tory government. The same, in reverse, will undoubtedly come to be said about the Justice and Security Bill and the Communications Data Bill (should they reach the Statute Book). Passed by a Tory government and maintained by a Labour government.

Our entire political class has colluded with the Americans in the eradication of our basic rights and legal protections as British citizens. Hence....there is currently No Choice in British politics. Whoever you vote for, you will still be "rendered" if the Americans want you, and - if the aforementioned Bills are passed - you will still be tried without ever knowing what the evidence against you was. To my mind, this represents an unprecedented corruption of the British state. To the Americans - for the historic and cultural reasons that you articulate so well - it undoubtedly represents nothing more than their usual standard of behaviour, when dealing with 'foreign' states and peoples.

seamus macniel's picture

"if you- yes, you - had a brain, you - would be dangerous".

a rather strange man who appears to know what is actually going on in syria, when those of who are not quite prepared to listen to the manufactures of consent, would at least use academic caution when discussing it.

furthermore, a simple top down reading of nayan chanda's "brother enemey", might be enough to enlighten all of us as to vietnam's rather limited role in the rise of pol pot, albeit a rather limited role that they were to later regret, when both the chinese and the united states facilitated our "stoneage maoists" wreaking havoc until the early 90s. where should we begin; with the fall of pnom pen to the khmer rouge, with the vietnamese invasion of cambodia and the chinese invasion of vietnam, with the sas and cia training the khmer rouge in its guerilla war against the vietnamese?

on the other hand, "yesteryear" actually conveys a truth. moreover, in that truth, there is enough mentioned to suggest that limitations of time and space have had their effect. undoubtly, mr pilger is aware of what assad, omar al-bashir and robert mugabe all are. however, he is astute enough to realise that these are not "our men" in africa and the middle east, unlike museveni, kagame and the saudi wahabbis and their side kicks in bahrain and elsewhere.

and, yes, how sad; there is no orwell, no blake, no shelley and no wilde. hey, but we have got mr pilger as an example of how consciousness can be achieved through the required cognitive processing and a some empathy with our fellow man, but then "cognitive processing" requires something doesn't it?
http://sansculottism.wordpress.com/

fairplay's picture

looks like my name has been hacked and comments posted in my name and ascribed to me...looks like John Pilger has touched more than a raw nerve ..more like a whole central nervous system.....

Mr Danger's picture

All the eager little followers squeal on cue when Pilger is challenged. Bless them.

I'm not sure if Pilger has ever written an article more full of random regurgitated thoughts from yesteryear. Did he write it five minutes before deadline?

But lets work with what we have. There is one subject that has been conspicuous for its absence from Pilger's writings in recent months. That would be Syria. Today it finally merits a brief mention:

"long-planned attacks on Syria and Iran beckon a world war"

Sorry, what? Syria murders thousands of its citizens and not only does Pilger refuse to criticize the regime, he refuses to even acknowledge that it is happening. Blair set up a 'police state' but when an actual police state guns downs its own citizens by the thousands Pilger will not utter a word. Does he care when they are blown to "f*cking dust"? Does he care if Syrian tank shells "suck the air out of their lungs"? You're damned right. He could not care less. They don't serve his extreme left agenda therefore their lives mean nothing to him.

Also, we are told that "Diego Garcia is crucial to America's and Britain's war on democracy. The heaviest bombing of Iraq and Afghanistan was launched from its vast airstrips"

Sorry, the great democracies of Saddam Hussein and Mullah Omar? I constantly underestimate the sheer gullibility of Pilger fans, but really, to read a sentence like that and not pause is to demonstrate the complete collapse of any cognitive function.

"The police clearly believe they have an impunity to kill."

Yes, as we can see from the recent riots this is a police force that uses violence with impunity!

Utter coward. Utter fraud.

ubicaritas's picture

Dear Coleridge,

Our primary responsibility is to impact the immoral practises that continue in our names today.

That is why the article is to be lauded - it gives us the information and the inspiration we need to do just that.

This should be your concern also, should it not ?(assuming you're around here and not from Pakistan)

Babies, I hope you will agree, cannot be Islamic fanatics.

ubicaritas's picture

Dear Mr Danger,

@Mr Danger
'Also, we are told that "Diego Garcia is crucial to America's and Britain's war on democracy. The heaviest bombing of Iraq and Afghanistan was launched from its vast airstrips"

Sorry, the great democracies of Saddam Hussein and Mullah Omar? I constantly underestimate the sheer gullibility of Pilger fans, but really, to read a sentence like that and not pause is to demonstrate the complete collapse of any cognitive function.'

I think perhaps it does - your cognitive function....

You have missed the point, or not read the article...

America and Britain's War on Democracy is a war on us - the people of those lands by the ruling powers of same.

The protests against invading Iraq were the largest protests EVER -

and it still happened - NOT very democratic of our governments.

And it is not just the Saddam Hussein's who are killed; don't you care that a people being brutalised by their own rulers then get starved and bombed by ours?

Babies babies babies babies babies babies babies babies babies babies babies babies babies babies

CRY WEEP AND BLOODY WAIL that we are discussing this academically

Latest tweets