Registered user login:

A woman's right to shoes

Ryan Gilbey

Published 29 May 2008

Miseryguts and Lobotomy Woman in a tale of gormless materialism
Sex and the City (15)
dir: Michael Patrick King

Before the HBO series Sex and the City began its six-year run in 1998, the world had suspected that women were enjoying guilt-free sex (sometimes when they had work the next morning, too). But until the show came along, this idea had never been expressed in such an unapologetic tenor on mainstream television. It made you want to travel back to 1977, to find Diane Keaton dragging her sorry self around the singles joints of that earlier, grimier New York in Looking for Mr Goodbar, and tell her: "It doesn't have to be like this" - possibly before addressing her as "girlfriend".

The frothy newspaper columnist Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker) and her friends - Samantha the hedonist (Kim Cattrall), Miranda the miseryguts (Cynthia Nixon) and Charlotte (Kristin Davis), who wears a gaping smile seen predominantly on lobotomy wards - raked over their chaotic love lives, treating with ribaldry those subjects usually only aired in sombre tones on This Morning. The logistics of converting to Judaism could be found in the same episode as discussions about the various flavours of semen. (I'd like to see Fern and Phillip tackle that one. Perhaps they could do a Pepsi Challenge.)

In the final season, Samantha reassured Carrie, who was fretting about uprooting to Paris: "Your fabulousness will translate." But the question facing Michael Patrick King, who has overseen the film version, is how the material will handle the shift to cinema, which demands a more extreme adjustment even than a move from New York to Paris. King has come up with a novel solution: do nothing. The picture is nearly two and a half hours long, but everything about the series is intact - disastrously so. The photography is flat, the editing rudimentary and the structure bitty and episodic in a way that never mattered in bite-sized 30-minute segments, but completely wrecks this big-screen equivalent.

Carrie is now the author of three bestsellers (with raised, gold-embossed lettering on the covers, I'll wager), and is preparing to wed her on-off boyfriend Mr Big (Chris Noth). I couldn't help but wonder when we would get to hear her immortal catchphrase - "I couldn't help but wonder . . ." - but, scandalously, she doesn't say it until the final scene. Luckily we still see her tapping ponderously at her laptop - head tilted at 45 degrees, tongue lolling between her lips, vacant eyes suggesting she's recently suffered an aneurysm.

Meanwhile, Samantha is going stir-crazy in Los Angeles with her actor boyfriend Smith Jerrod (Jason Lewis). Carrie has a new PA, Louise (Jennifer Hudson), and there are various toddlers who belong ostensibly to Miseryguts and Lobotomy Woman, but who receive less affection from them than the brands and logos paraded in front of the camera. I wouldn't say the film's product placement is excessive, but the only store that doesn't appear to have bought itself an adoring close-up is Mister Byrite, where my mum used to send me for cut-price Farahs. I'm not against product placement per se, but even the best-written heart-to-heart scene can only be undermined when you can tell it's choreographed to show everything from Pret A Manger sarnies to Manolo bloody Blahniks in the most flattering light.

The film could have been witty about this, but its tone of gormless materialism remains as unironic as it is unwavering. Louise receives a Louis Vuitton handbag from Carrie with the breathless gratitude of a transplant patient landing a new kidney; and when Carrie gets a wedding dress in the post from Vivienne Westwood, the rhapsodic music and adoring camerawork suggests that a loved one has been raised from the dead, or a lost child returned home. In the middle of a credit crunch, this feels less like sugary escapism than salt poured on a large wound.

But, as with the TV series, there's always Kim Cattrall to temper the pain. With her cutting gibes and those legs like scissors, she could have waltzed straight out of a Preston Sturges film. Long after this unnecessary picture has hit the bargain bins, grown adults will be smiling fondly at the thought of Cattrall in a floppy sun hat the size of a manta ray, or wearing nothing but strategically positioned sushi.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

blondcat
25 June 2008 at 09:11

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Designer Label Fetishism in the Cardboard City

By Cédric Van der Hauwaert

Without the glitzy outfits, collagen ODing and "old school Hollywood" masculine charm of Chris Noth a.k.a. Mr. Big, this would be one seriously depressing romp.

Sad, desperate for attention and botoxed to the gills, these gals offer a bleak and pricey prospect for American womanhood.

I genuinely loved the Sex and The City series. That's before I made the unfortunate and unpremeditated decision to go see the vile and retrograde label queen bonanza this big-screen never-ending "sad gal story" turned out to be. When I now catch a rerun of its now mythological small screen ancestor, I get an uncontrollable urge to smash my TV into oblivion and curse the corporation-controlled mall America has become – the commercialization being so egregious even wayward and ever-edgy Manhattan is now a sanitized post-Giuliani hole deplorably synonymous with this disturbing consumerism propaganda film for ageing women; SATC the movie is a vulgar, dialogue-ridden commercial for designer labels stretched beyond two hours and the confines of any credible romanticism – while the show was never a realist depiction of everyday life in Gotham City, this movie is a cartoonish and lobotomized parody of the sexy dream world conjured up in the series.

The cynical credo of the movie, Samantha's silly quip "I love you but I love myself more should be read, in the context of the movie, as "I love dick but sadly it doesn't have Fendi loudly vomited all over it. The bitchy, insightful (at least for a television show) chatter at upscale Manhattan coffee places and hip Asian food joints that become the gorgeous trademark of the show, has been rudely stripped from this celluloid opus to the dollar.

Granted, there are a few plot twists

Fans of the series have every reason to feel insulted for the picture's bland violation of continuity. Bitchy homo's Anthony Marantino and Stanford Blatch – by whom, déjà in the series I felt insulted as a gay man for their "My Best Friend's Wedding" desexualized, and because of that dehumanized portrayals of Chelsea homosexuals – fashionista poodles who only serve as valets to posh upper class Fifth Avenue white women – each others guts are now an item in absence of a subplot that takes more than 5 minutes and a macchiato to come up with.

blondcat
27 June 2008 at 14:10

Friday, June 27, 2008

Designer Label Fetishism in the Cardboard City

By Cédric Van der Hauwaert

Without the glitzy outfits, collagen ODing and "old school Hollywood" masculine charm of Chris Noth a.k.a. Mr. Big, this would be one seriously depressing romp.

I genuinely loved the Sex and The City series. That's before I made the unfortunate and unpremeditated decision to go see the vile and retrograde label queen bonanza this big-screen never-ending "sad gal story" turned out to be. Nowadays, upon unfortunately catching the gazillionth rerun of its now mythological small screen ancestor, I get an uncontrollable urge to smash my TV into oblivion and curse the corporation-controlled mall America has become – the commercialization being so egregious even wayward and ever-edgy Manhattan is now a sanitized post-Giuliani hole deplorably synonymous with this disturbing consumerism propaganda film for ageing women; SATC the movie is a vulgar, dialogue-ridden commercial for designer labels stretched needlessly beyond two hours (they could use the picture at Guantanamo, I bet we would soon get those missing flight boxes) and the confines of any credible or enjoyable romanticism – while the show was never (intended to be) a realist depiction of everyday life in Gotham, this maltzy attempt at a movie is a cartoonish and lobotomized (especially Kristin Davis, who obviously had Paxil injected into her cheeks by studio medics) parody of the sexy dream world competently conjured up in the HBO series.

The cynical credo of the movie, Samantha's silly quip "I love you but I love myself more" should be read, in the context of the movie, as "I love your suckworthy schlong but sadly it doesn't have Fendi loudly vomited all over it". The bitchy, insightful (at least for a television show) chatter at upscale Manhattan coffee places and hip Asian food joints that instantly became the gorgeous trademark of the show, has been rudely stripped from this long and tedious celluloid opus to the dollar.

Fans of the series have every reason to feel insulted for the picture's bland violation of continuity. Bitchy homo's Anthony Marantino and Stanford Blatch – by whom, déjà in the series I felt insulted as a gay man for their "My Best Friend's Wedding" desexualized, thus dehumanized portrayals of Chelsea homosexuals, fashionista poodles who only serve as docile valets to posh upper class Fifth Avenue white women, who hated each others guts on the TV screen, are now an item in absence of a subplot that takes more than 5 minutes and a macchiato to come up with.

Sad, desperate for attention and botoxed to the gills, these gals offer a bleak and pricey prospect for American womanhood.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Ryan Gilbey

Ryan Gilbey is the author of It Don't Worry Me (Faber), about 1970s US cinema, and a study of Groundhog Day in the 'Modern Classics' series (BFI Publishing). He was named reviewer of the year in the 2007 Press Gazette awards and he is the New Statesman's film critic..

Read More

Vote!

Would you feed GM foods to your children?