<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
   <title>New Statesman - <![CDATA[Peter Noorlander]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/writers/peter_noorlander</link>
 
  <description><![CDATA[]]></description> 
   <language>en</language>



				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[A right to keep digging]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/law-and-reform/2007/04/information-act-freedom-bill</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/law-and-reform/2007/04/information-act-freedom-bill</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Peter Noorlander</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Observations on freedom of information</em></p>

<p>Freedom of information has never been popular with British politicians. Only as recently as 2005 did Britain guarantee the right to access information held by public authorities, when the Freedom of Information Act came fully into force. It was among the last countries in Europe to do so. Now, both government and opposition want to water down the act.</p>
<p>While Labour is still considering new fees regulations to limit the  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/law-and-reform/2007/04/information-act-freedom-bill">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
    </channel>
</rss>