<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
   <title>New Statesman - <![CDATA[Neil Tennant]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/writers/neil_tennant</link>
 
  <description><![CDATA[]]></description> 
   <language>en</language>



				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Diary - Neil Tennant]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/200409130003</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/200409130003</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Neil Tennant</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>"Is this Tony Banks?" I asked James Fox. "No," he remonstrated. "Tony Blair." Three and a half years later, I was invited to the notorious "Noel Gallagher" victory party</em></p>

<p>Why doesn't anyone make silent films any more? To quote Depeche Mode ("Enjoy the Silence"): "Words are very/unnecessary/ They can only do harm". A silent film tells its story through the editing together of images, but many films rely on words to advance the narrative; this isn't cinema, it's theatre (or maybe television). I have this particular bee in my bonnet because I've watched Sergei Eisenstein's Battleship Potemkin dozens, if  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/200409130003">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
    </channel>
</rss>