<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
   <title>New Statesman - <![CDATA[Mark Lynas]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/writers/mark_lynas</link>
 
  <description><![CDATA[Mark Lynas is a climate change writer and activist, author of the acclaimed book 'High Tide' and fortnightly columnist for the New Statesman.  He was selected by National Geographic as an 'Emerging Explorer' for 2006, and blogs on www.marklynas.org]]></description> 
   <language>en</language>

    



				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[World saved . . . planet doomed]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/11/climate-lynas-green-energy</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/11/climate-lynas-green-energy</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:30:27 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Green activists are seeing the global economic crisis as an opportunity, but the truth remains: high economic growth cannot be reconciled with limited resources</em></p>

<p>You could call it the see-saw effect: it has long been an article of political faith that as worries about the economy go up, interest in the environment must go down. It stands to reason: people who are concerned today about their jobs have more immediate matters of alarm than whether or not there may be more storms in 2055. Environmental concerns are a luxury of the rich, something we  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/11/climate-lynas-green-energy">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why greens must learn to love nuclear power]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:23:36 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Global warming and finite resources mean our way of life is more threatened than ever, and it's time for the environmental movement to face up to some hard truths</em></p>

<p>"If nuclear power is the answer, it must have been a pretty stupid question," went an oft-cited slogan of the 1970s environmental movement. But the question was not stupid, and it is even less so today when the challenge is even blunter: how are we going to provide for our energy needs in a way that does not destroy, via global warming, the capacity of our planet to support life?  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/09/nuclear-power-lynas-reactors">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Seeing the bigger picture]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/art/2008/09/human-impact-lynas-natural</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/art/2008/09/human-impact-lynas-natural</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A soon-to-be published collection of photographs demonstrates that art is vital in helping us understand the impact of human beings on the environment</em></p>

<p>This might sound hyperbolic, but it is true: there is no longer any part of the globe that remains "natural" in any meaningful sense. Even the apparently pristine ice-clad poles are contaminated by man-made chemicals, many of which concentrate in the food chain - through fish, whales and seals - making the breastmilk of Inuit women so loaded with poisons as to constitute, in effect, toxic waste. Humanity bestrides the  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/art/2008/09/human-impact-lynas-natural">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[How nuclear power can save the planet]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/08/lynas-climate-nuclear-coal</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/08/lynas-climate-nuclear-coal</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Increased use of nuclear (an outright competitor to coal as a deliverer of baseload power) is essential to combat climate change</em></p>

<p>The location for this year's Camp for Climate Action - outside the Kingsnorth power station in Kent - was well chosen: it is here that E.ON wants to build the first new coal-fired plant in the UK in nearly 30 years. With coal the most global-warming-intensive fuel on the market, and six more coal plants in the pipeline if Kingsnorth gets the go-ahead, there is a clear line to be  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/08/lynas-climate-nuclear-coal">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Coming to a screen near you - me!]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/climate-change-lynas-film</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/climate-change-lynas-film</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>How things have changed. Today, bookshops have entire shelves devoted to climate change. Television, too, has belatedly begun to catch up</em></p>

<p>Three years ago, the environmentalist and writer Bill McKibben made a striking observation: that despite overwhelming evidence of a world-threatening rise in temperatures, our cultural realm seemed unaware of the looming crisis. "Where are the books?" he demanded. "The poems? The plays? The goddamn operas?" Global warming, he concluded, "hasn't registered in our gut; it isn't part of our culture".</p>
<p>How things have changed. Today, bookshops have entire shelves devoted  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/climate-change-lynas-film">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[A Green New Deal]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/lynas-towards-economy-climate</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/lynas-towards-economy-climate</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A "war economy" social mobilisation harnessed, this time not towards fighting fascism, but towards heading off ecological crisis</em></p>

<p>If you thought a growing economy was bad, try living through a recession. Environmentalists routinely denounce the "mantra" of economic growth, pointing out - quite rationally and entirely correctly - that infinite growth on a finite planet does not make mathematical, let alone ecological, sense. But the idea of a no-growth, steady-state economy has always sounded like pie in the sky - and you have only to read the papers  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/lynas-towards-economy-climate">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[The global warming deniers]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/global-warming-lynas-climate</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/global-warming-lynas-climate</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:29:43 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The arguments of climate sceptics have largely been moulded by a far more sinister force - the US-based conservative think tanks</em></p>

<p>I am finding it increasingly difficult to maintain my optimism that we can stabilise global temperature increases below the "danger level" of 2°C. First, there is no sign that emissions are being reduced; rather, the opposite is happening. Second, it is becoming clear that the danger level for temperature increase is a good deal lower than 2°C.</p>
<p>The Arctic Sea ice cover is already approaching a new low. The new  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/07/global-warming-lynas-climate">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[After the oil crunch?]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/06/oil-prices-lynas-world-carbon</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/06/oil-prices-lynas-world-carbon</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The end of cheap oil helps renewables, but makes far dirtier alternatives viable. A low-carbon future will demand brave leadership</em></p>

<p>There are two competing explanations for today's high oil prices. One sees the price rise as the result of a temporary imbalance between supply and demand, exacerbated by a weak dollar and a bubble of speculative commodities trading. Fix these problems, adherents suggest, and the price can return to previous low levels, allowing business to continue as usual. The other sees the current price spike as symptomatic of a much  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/06/oil-prices-lynas-world-carbon">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Why I was wrong about rationing]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/05/carbon-rationing-lynas</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/05/carbon-rationing-lynas</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A far simpler way to constrain carbon is to deal "upstream" with the few dozen companies that produce or import fossil fuels, rather than hitting tens of millions of consumers</em></p>

<p>I should start with an apology. In October 2006 I wrote an article for the New Statesman strongly advocating carbon rationing as the only appropriate response to the emergency of climate change. So you might expect me to be furious that the Environment Secretary, Hilary Benn, has shelved a suggested rationing scheme following a lukewarm government feasibility study. But I believe Benn has taken the right decision. Rationing now seems  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/05/carbon-rationing-lynas">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Political will is a renewable resource]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/05/germany-lynas-energy-solar</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/05/germany-lynas-energy-solar</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Mark Lynas</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Germany has 200 times more solar power installed than the UK - and this is not because Germany gets any more sun</em></p>

<p>You may have seen the ads - enough to make any football fan's blood boil: "Germany 200, England 1". No, this was not a report from the World Cup qualifiers, it was a straightforward calculation of how much further forward Germany is in implementing the clean-energy revolution. Germany has 200 times more solar power installed than the UK - and this is not because Germany gets any more sun. The  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/05/germany-lynas-energy-solar">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
    </channel>
</rss>