<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
   <title>New Statesman - <![CDATA[Kira Cochrane]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/writers/kira_cochrane</link>
 
  <description><![CDATA[Kira Cochrane is the women's editor for the Guardian and writes a regular column in the New Statesman.]]></description> 
   <language>en</language>

    



				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[And it's goodbye to all that . . .]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/07/cochrane-work-goodbye-cowboy</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/07/cochrane-work-goodbye-cowboy</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:29:43 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>I didn't want my boyfriend to glance into the study one day to find a pile of ash beside smouldering cowboy boots </em></p>

<p>It's been a shortish two and a half years and certainly sweet, but I've decided I have to give up this column. The tug of war between work and weekends has been going on for a long time - work always winning out - and I started to fear I might spontaneously combust. I didn't want my boyfriend to glance into the study one day to find a pile of  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/07/cochrane-work-goodbye-cowboy">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Are gender stereotypes boring?]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2008/06/cochrane-sex-women-gender</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2008/06/cochrane-sex-women-gender</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Suggestions one sex is more intelligent, witty, sympathetic, moral or interesting than the other do tend to be objectionable</em></p>

<p>Anyone who is particularly fond of sweeping sexist generalisations (and really, who doesn't just love the suggestion that all women are shoe-obsessed chatterboxes, for instance, while all men are emotionally repressed sports nuts?) was in for a treat in the Daily Telegraph this past week.</p>
<p>Recently, the paper featured an article by Sabine Durrant, baldly headlined: "Are men boring?" A ramble through a heap of anecdotes, shot through with science,  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2008/06/cochrane-sex-women-gender">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Retrosexual, or just misogynist?]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/06/cochrane-women-woman-long</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/06/cochrane-women-woman-long</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:43:01 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>There is still a long way to go to full equality, and we have seen the culture regress in some ways</em></p>

<p>Men: it's time to throw away your razor, start fashioning a handlebar moustache, get a crate of beer in and begin referring to women as "the little ladies". In the past few weeks there has been an outbreak of nostalgia for an old-fashioned understanding of masculinity. First, there was the ludicrously overblown launch of the new James Bond novel, Devil May Care, involving a Navy destroyer, helicopters and a willowy  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/06/cochrane-women-woman-long">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Sleep deprivation is no badge of honour]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/05/cochrane-sleep-cope-ability</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/05/cochrane-sleep-cope-ability</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The ability to cope without sleep has been seen as the main mark of a leader for some years now: a signifier of toughness, machismo, strong-mindedness</em></p>

<p>Just reading about the campaign schedules of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama over the past few months has made me want to curl up under my duvet with a cup of camomile tea and a sleeping pill - so I hate to think how they must be feeling. I am writing this before the results of the Kentucky and Oregon primaries on Tuesday, so I don't know whether the gruelling  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/05/cochrane-sleep-cope-ability">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Angry Anna shows us how to age]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/05/cochrane-age-older-woman</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/05/cochrane-age-older-woman</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>While the older generation bears the brunt of pernicious ageism, a fear of being considered old infects society as a whole </em></p>

<p>I've always liked Anna Ford, especially since I read that she is nicknamed "Angry Anna" by some - which essentially just means "a woman called Anna who has an opinion" and is therefore, albeit unintentionally, just about the best thing any woman could be called. And I particularly enjoyed her latest sally in the war against ageism. Speaking to Saga magazine, she asked readers to "count the women over 60  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/05/cochrane-age-older-woman">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[The "sweetie" problem]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/04/cochrane-sweetie-obama-context</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/04/cochrane-sweetie-obama-context</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Language is a mutable, fluid construct, open to the vagaries of context, and that's the way I like it</em></p>

<p>On April Fool's Day, Barack Obama could be found doing exactly what he has been doing for the past year - glad-handing excitable would-be voters. This time he was at a clothes manufacturing plant in Allentown, Pennsylvania, meeting and greeting the predominantly female workforce.</p>
<p>All went well up to (and, indeed, following) the moment when he reportedly called one of the workers "sweetie". In fact, what with Obama being given  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/04/cochrane-sweetie-obama-context">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Pets? I should Coco]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/03/cochrane-pet-cat-cheating</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/03/cochrane-pet-cat-cheating</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>My cat never bothers me with her suspicions about her cheating boyfriend</em></p>

<p>It only ever takes a brief flick through a fashion magazine for me to find hundreds of unlikely garments that I would never consider wearing - even for a £1,000 bet. Those heel-free high heels that are everywhere this season? I can almost feel my ankles snap just looking at them. A suit jacket worn without trousers, or a skirt, or even a sneaky hint of hot pants? Thanks, but  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/03/cochrane-pet-cat-cheating">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Your library: use it or lose it]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/03/cochrane-libraries-library</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/03/cochrane-libraries-library</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Now, more than ever, libraries need support, including whatever investment or bold financial planning is needed to take them forward</em></p>

<p>This past week was certainly a busy one for the intrepid culture minister, Margaret Hodge. First up, she caused a minor storm by suggesting that the Proms weren't particularly welcoming to people from a wide range of backgrounds - something I had always assumed too, from the footage of people bellowing anthems and waving Union Jacks on the last night but which, according to Hodge's detractors, is very, very wrong.  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/03/cochrane-libraries-library">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Who would be a teenager now?]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/02/cochrane-teenagers-children</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/02/cochrane-teenagers-children</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Yes, some teenagers are unruly, even violent but rather than single out those actually causing trouble, we lump them all together</em></p>

<p>For years it has been sneeringly dubbed a Mickey Mouse course, and this past week came the official confirmation - a comparison showed that, yes, indeed, a media studies A-level is marginally easier than an English A-level. Bet that wiped the smiles off the faces of all those kids who passed the course last summer, right? Ha!</p>
<p>Also having their smiles removed: anyone with an A-level in sociology. Yep, it  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/02/cochrane-teenagers-children">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[A brand called you and me]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/01/cochrane-brand-lucrative</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/01/cochrane-brand-lucrative</guid>
   <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Kira Cochrane</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A poorly educated country girl was going to be nowhere near as lucrative as what she could be made to represent - that contradictory concept of the "slutty virgin"</em></p>

<p>Whoever would have thought that a public meltdown could be so lucrative? This month the business magazine Portfolio published "The Britney Economy: a back-of-the-napkin calculation of just how much the scandal-plagued star is worth to the multitudes who make money off her". And the figures were startling.</p>
<p>One Los Angeles picture agency, for instance, "estimates that Britney accounts for 30 per cent of its revenue". She apparently brings in 20  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2008/01/cochrane-brand-lucrative">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
    </channel>
</rss>