<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
 <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
   <title>New Statesman - <![CDATA[Andrew Oswald]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/writers/andrew_oswald</link>
 
  <description><![CDATA[Andrew Oswald is professor of economics at Warwick University and an ESRC professorial fellow. He has won various awards for his research, including Princeton University’s Lester Prize]]></description> 
   <language>en</language>

    



				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Don't keep up with the Joneses]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/life-and-society/2008/01/economic-growth-nation-happy</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/life-and-society/2008/01/economic-growth-nation-happy</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Andrew Oswald</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Once a nation has filled its larders is there any point in getting richer? Prof. Andrew Oswald on how economic growth doesn't make us happy</em></p>

<p>In espousing quality of life for his nation, French President Nicolas Sarkozy is rare. Most politicians think economic growth is what makes a nation happier. </p>
<p>"Britain is today experiencing the longest period of sustained economic growth since the year 1701 – and we are determined to maintain it," began Gordon Brown, then chancellor of the exchequer, in the first sentence of his 2005 Budget speech. </p>
<p>Now prime minister,  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/life-and-society/2008/01/economic-growth-nation-happy">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
				
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Buy your home and kill a job]]></title>
   <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/199906280006</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newstatesman.com/199906280006</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Andrew Oswald</dc:creator>
  
  <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Andrew Oswald argues that all the usual explanations for unemployment are completely wrong</em></p>

<p>Economists have tried for a long time to understand why joblessness in the leading industrial countries has risen from around 2 per cent in the 1950s to approximately 10 per cent today. The standard explanations are that trade unions have become too powerful, unemployment benefits too generous, labour too highly taxed, the workers too inflexible. No doubt each of these explanations plays some role in the whole answer. The trouble  <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/199906280006">[...]</a></p>
]]></description>
 </item>
    </channel>
</rss>