Return to: Home | World Affairs | Europe

Losing your marbles

Helena Smith

Published 18 June 2009

Observations on the Parthenon Marbles

A little before noon on Saturday 13 June, in the heart of Athens, the classical carvings known as the Parthenon Marbles were removed from their protective cellophane, to be glimpsed for the first time in the New Acropolis Museum. There in the upper gallery, within view of the sacred rock itself, the icons of ancient Greece will remain.

Antonis Samaras, the tall, urbane Greek minister of culture, ushered me in to see the sculptures, a week before the official opening of their new €130m (£110m) home.

“You are the first one to see them without cellophane,” he said, and added, “and now you can see why there is such a big ‘why’.”

The New Acropolis Museum is a crowning achievement of modern Greek culture – completed after more than 30 years of procrastination and acrimonious debate. It is luminous, cavernous and designed to echo the Golden Age temples. There are few places as stupendous as this. Samaras’s tour, almost two years after my last visit to the then half-finished museum, was a treat I had long looked forward to. And there I was, standing before the sculptures.

“They’re awful, eye-poppingly awful,” I blurted, as Samaras walked around exclaiming: “This one’s English, that one’s authentic, this one’s in the British Museum, that one’s the real thing.”

With more than 60 per cent of Phidias’s monumental frieze on display in Bloomsbury, thanks to Lord Elgin, Athens has had to make do with giant plaster-cast copies, acquired from the British Museum in the 19th century, to narrate the full tale of the frieze’s great Panathenaic Procession.

Museum curators had initially contemplated “touching up” the casts with a patina to make them seem more authentic, but officials finally stuck with the deeply unsettling whiter-than-white finish. Interspersed with Iktinos’s exquisite originals, they stand out like eyesores.

“One of the most important elements of this museum is to show, in total clarity, the truth,” said Samaras. “And the truth is that something is missing and that times have changed, and that even most Britons now believe the marbles should be reunited here in Athens.” Looking up at the light-speckled Parthenon, he continued: “Finally, this demolishes the charge that we don’t have a proper place to display and preserve the sculptures.”

The world’s most famous frieze, amputated against the backdrop of the temple it once adorned, has a peculiar effect. If you are an art lover you want to scream at the pity of it all. If you are English you want to curl up beneath one of the marbles in embarrassment and cry out: “Give them back!”

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

Dan Asta
18 June 2009 at 16:05

Ah, but Helena, don't you understand, in Greece the marbles are outside of their "world context." The marbles are for "everyone," not just Greeks. "Everyone" is in London, not Athens. The world gathers in the UK seeking its "context" among other nations. Why would anyone insist on cloistered, ethnocentric, "small" contexts that insist things are better understood in their original situation?

The world is meant to be divided up and rearranged!! How else can "everyone" get a sense of the "world" if not all at once, say on Saturday afternoon, in a London museum?

johnny
19 June 2009 at 08:58

But dear Dan, since when Bloomsbury is the earth's centre? The marbles in Athens will be in their "original world context".

I just can't understand your ethnocentric and imperialistic point of view! The world is not an empire with London its capital!!

1964Byron
19 June 2009 at 11:57

Ok, for the sake of the conversation we accept that artworks are for everyone.

Elgin did not buy the artworks from the Greek owners. He bought them from a state that illegally held Greece at the time, the Ottoman Muslims.

Today’s Muslims are bad and called terrorists because they try to save their countries and oil from foreign hands and Muslims of that time were good and considered the rightful owners of Greece?

If I buy a bunch of Turner paintings that were previously stolen from the National Gallery would I be the rightful owner?

If what changes things is the ownership of the Turner paintings by a specific entity (the museum) then what if (theoretically talking) someone manages, in a Hollywood like operation, to steal Big Ben or part of it. If I buy it from that someone, would I be the rightful owner since artworks is for all to own? The Brits who build it and as a state building don’t have a particular title for it, have no rights on it?

This is called buying stolen property. No?

I think that the conservative ruling class of Britain embarrasses its nation and especially the British people that are ethical and respect what is right and most importantly, their majority wants the return of the stolen artifacts.

No matter what will be the end of this issue, Greeks will continue respecting and loving the British people.

pgerardos
19 June 2009 at 18:34

Dan,

Regarding the quote:

'The marbles are for "everyone" ', i couldn't agree more.

But by stating:

' "Everyone" is in London' , you have the nerve to call Greeks 'ethnocentric' ?

I'm Greek and i believe that the things our ancestors made don't belong to us.We, as human beings should cherish them, respect them, 'enjoy' them and learn from them.Not just Greeks, everyone around the world.

I've been in London and I've seen the marbles.And i must admit that they get both the attention and the respect that they probably deserve.At least, that's my personal opinion.

But why have a part of something apart from it's whole?Acropolis is still standing here, but a part of it is in Britain.

And besides the fact that this part was stolen, the thief is well known across the world (Britain) and not only publicly exposes the marbles, but also denies to return them to it's original place.NOT TO GREEKS AS PEOPLE - I MEAN GEOGRAPHICALLY.THIS IS IT'S ORIGINAL PLACE.

I don't like arrogance you see.It's like the Motorhead song: 'Just cause you got the power, doesn't mean you've got the right'....

I say, 'i wanna go to New York to see the skyscrapers', 'i wanna go to Australia to see the Sydney opera' etc, cause the world has different cultures and different history which is - whether you like it or not - globally distributed unevenly....

But then, you've said it all: "The world is meant to be divided up and rearranged"... too British...too bad..

Pavlos Gerardos,

Athens, Greece

Fix
20 June 2009 at 04:58

Dan....world context? context of museums as treasure troves? I think the argument for the Parthenon scupltures is about context - the meaning making process that museum's currently claim to provide their visitors.. the meaning making process is complete and in context if these return to Athens to complete the jigsaw puzzle. To use visitors numbers between London and Greece to argue where they should be is rather crude and missing the whole point. The British museum has no reasonable argument left- If it professes to be a museum, and subscribes to current museum theory in so far as its relationship with its visitors are concerned it will return the missing pieces from this brilliant frieze that once adorned the parthenon. We are not talking about free standing objects but pieces of a larger story. The Empire is no more - get over it. We are

m3000
20 June 2009 at 11:53

Pavlos, Dan was being ironic.

Dimitri_M
20 June 2009 at 20:06

Pavlo, I think Dan was really being ironic, quote: How else can "everyone" get a sense of the "world" if not all at once, say on Saturday afternoon, in a London museum?

You might have to get used to British humor I guess.. before trying to offend a nation (too British.. too bad) like that.. And anyway, i m sure the marbles will return to our homeland at some point, now there is the space (the light and air filters and all that fancy technology you need to preserve them...).

But for the sake of this conversation (blog? post? whatever we call it nowadays), what about the Acropolis? How much longer is it going to be standing there, with all the scafolding around it? Waiting for one of the two families(Papandreou, Karamanlis)/Parties (PASOK/ND) that have been governing our country for the past what 20? 25? years to think outside the box, further than the four years they get elected for, and actually properly fund its restoration before it turns into dust from all the acid rain.. (By the way I am not trying to offend anyone that is politically on the side of either PASOK or ND).

Another Greek,

Tavistock, Devon, UK

iliassa
21 June 2009 at 02:35

The frieze is a narrative to 'read' the lapse in grammar (sic) ugly plaster casts is disruptive to absorb the work.i have visited the BM over many years and the beige setting the marbles are consigned to never fails to

make my heart sink. I have been in the new Acropolis museum - its light and airy spaces sets off the marbles

to advantage. if for no other reason they have to be reunited. same goes for the severed kariatis. with

whom i held imaginary conversations as a child growing up in Diogenous street.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker