Socialism's comeback

At the beginning of the century, the chances of socialism making a return looked close to zero. Yet now, all around Europe, the red flag is flying again.

 

"If socialism signifies a political and economic system in which the government controls a large part of the economy and redistributes wealth to produce social equality, then I think it is safe to say the likelihood of its making a comeback any time in the next generation is close to zero," wrote Francis Fukuyama, author of The End of History, in Time magazine in 2000.

He should take a trip around Europe today.

Make no mistake, socialism - pure, unadulterated socialism, an ideology that was taken for dead by liberal capitalists - is making a strong comeback. Across the continent, there is a definite trend in which long-established parties of the centre left that bought in to globalisation and neoliberalism are seeing their electoral dominance challenged by unequivocally socialist parties which have not.

The parties in question offer policies which mark a clean break from the Thatcherist agenda that many of Europe's centre-left parties have embraced over the past 20 years. They advocate renationalisation of privatised state enterprises and a halt to further liberalisation of the public sector. They call for new wealth taxes to be imposed and for a radical redistribution of wealth. They defend the welfare state and the rights of all citizens to a decent pension and free health care. They strongly oppose war - and any further expansion of Nato.

Most fundamentally of all, they challenge an economic system in which the interests of ordinary working people are subordinated to those of capital.

Nowhere is this new leftward trend more apparent than in Germany, home to the meteoric rise of Die Linke ("The Left"), a political grouping formed only 18 months ago - and co-led by the veteran socialist "Red" Oskar Lafontaine, a long-standing scourge of big business. The party, already the main opposition to the Christian Democrats in eastern Germany, has made significant inroads into the vote for the Social Democratic Party (SPD) in elections to western parliaments this year, gaining representation in Lower Saxony, Hamburg and Hesse. Die Linke's unapologetically socialist policies, which include the renation alisation of electricity and gas, the banning of hedge funds and the introduction of a maximum wage, chime with a population concerned at the dismantling of Germany's mixed economic model and the adoption of Anglo-Saxon capitalism - a shift that occurred while the SPD was in government.

An opinion poll last year showed that 45 per cent of west Germans (and 57 per cent of east Germans) consider socialism "a good idea"; in October, another poll showed that Germans overwhelmingly favour nationalisation of large segments of the economy. Two-thirds of all Germans say they agree with all or some of Die Linke's programme.

It's a similar story of left-wing revival in neighbouring Holland. There the Socialist Party of the Netherlands (SP), which almost trebled its parliamentary representation in the most recent general election (2006), and which made huge gains in last year's provincial elections, continues to make headway.

Led by a charismatic 41-year-old epidemiologist, Agnes Kant, the SP is on course to surpass the Dutch Labour Party, a member of the ruling conservative-led coalition, as the Netherlands' main left-of centre grouping.

The SP has gained popularity by being the only left-wing Dutch parliamentary party to campaign for a "No" vote during the 2005 referendum on the EU constitutional treaty and for its opposition to large-scale immigration, which it regards as being part of a neoliberal package that encourages flexible labour markets.

The party calls for a society where the values of "human dignity, equality and solidarity" are most prominent, and has been scathing in its attacks on what it describes as "the culture of greed", brought about by "a capitalism based on inflated bonuses and easy money". Like Die Linke, the SP campaigns on a staunchly anti-war platform - demanding an end to Holland's role as "the US's lapdog".

In Greece, the party on the up is the Coalition of the Radical Left (SYRIZA), the surprise package in last year's general election. As public opposition to the neoliberal econo mic policies of the ruling New Democracy government builds, SYRIZA's opinion-poll ratings have risen to almost 20 per cent - putting it within touching distance of PASOK, the historical left-of-centre opposition, which has lurched sharply to the right in recent years. SYRIZA is particularly popular with young voters: its support among those aged 35 and under stands at roughly 30 per cent in the polls, ahead of PASOK.

In Norway, socialists are already in power; the ruling "red-green" coalition consists of the Socialist Left Party, the Labour Party and the Centre Party. Since coming to power three years ago, the coalition - which has been labelled the most left-wing government in Europe, has halted the privatisation of state-owned companies and made further development of the welfare state, public health care and improving care for the elderly its priorities.

The success of such forces shows that there can be an electoral dividend for left-wing parties if voters see them responding to the crisis of modern capitalism by offering boldly socialist solutions. Their success also demonstrates the benefits to electoral support for socialist groupings as they put aside their differences to unite behind a commonly agreed programme.

For example, Die Linke consists of a number of internal caucuses - or forums - including the "Anti-Capitalist Left", "Communist Platform" and "Democratic Socialist Forum". SYRIZA is a coalition of more than ten Greek political groups. And the Dutch Socialist Party - which was originally called the Communist Party of the Netherlands, has successfully brought socialists and communists together to support its collectivist programme.

It is worth noting that those European parties of the centre left which have not fully embraced the neoliberal agenda are retaining their dominant position. In Spain, the governing Socialist Workers' Party has managed to maintain its broad left base and was re-elected for another four-year term in March, with Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero promising a "socialist economic policy" that would focus on the needs of workers and the poor.

There are exceptions to the European continent's shift towards socialism. Despite the recent election of leftist Martine Aubry as leader of the French Socialist Party, the French left has been torn apart by divisions, at the very moment when it could be exploiting the growing unpopularity of the Sarkozy administration.

And, in Britain, despite opinion being argu ably more to the left on economic issues than at any time since 1945, few are calling for a return to socialism.

The British left, despite promising initiatives such as September's Convention of the Left in Manchester, which gathered representatives from several socialist groups, still remains fragmented and divided. The left's espousal of unrestricted or loosely controlled immigration is also, arguably, a major vote loser among working-class voters who should provide its core support. No socialist group in Britain has as yet articulated a critique of mass immigration from an anti-capitalist and anti-racist viewpoint in the way the Socialist Party of the Netherlands has.

And even if a Die Linke-style coalition of progressive forces could be built and put on a formal footing in time for the next general election, Britain's first-past-the-post system provides a formidable obstacle to change.

Nevertheless, the prognosis for socialism in Britain and the rest of Europe is good. As the recession bites, and neoliberalism is discredited, the phenomenon of unequivocally socialist parties with clear, anti-capitalist, anti-globalist messages gaining ground, and even replacing "Third Way" parties in Europe, is likely to continue.

Even in Britain, where the electoral system grants huge advantage to the established parties, pressure on Labour to jettison its commitment to neoliberal policies and to adopt a more socialist agenda is sure to intensify.

307 comments

a.m.r.'s picture

writeon, so your solution is the existing Swedish model
accompanied by a large asset-grab from the existing rich.
Why did it take you so long to say so?

By the way, it's not me who is taking this 'too seriously' -
after all, you're the one who felt the need to threaten to
'unleash' your academic accomplishments, wealth and
erudition just because your posts were making you look
increasingly foolish, puerile and evasively dishonest.

So you finally retreat to a standard uncontroversial
position (although joking about "re-education" for the elite
- I assume, as members of the elite, you will be sending
your parents and family for "re-education"). I am
reminded of wealthy Bill Ayers, advocating much the
same. You seem to be another crypto-Marxist - knowing
Marxism to be pseudo-science, wrong in its assumptions,
logic, and conclusion,empirically disproved by it's
predictions, I can only assume you're into for other
reasons
At least Marx had the excuse of not knowing what a
disaster his theory, utterly misunderstanding human
nature, would turn out to be in practice.

genecrabtree920's picture

"So we have "free and fair elections" a "free press" and can vote, fantastic. None of that is relevant to the dead."
One second writeon- we all know that the dead dont care.

But my question is: do the living care about "free and fair elections" a "free press" and the ability to vote??

Answer the question, writeon. And Im talking about the living in general- not philosophical intellectuals with their heads in the clouds like you.

Nilsey105's picture

a.m.r.
"At least Marx had the excuse of not knowing what a
disaster his theory, utterly misunderstanding human
nature, would turn out to be in practice".
Oh what a sweeping statement of inordinate magnitude. Expand your theory on this please a.m.r. and i shal gladly comment.

writeon's picture

a.m.r.

You can't see the wood for the trees. You really still don't understand do you? Irony seems to soar above your head. You insist in your efforts to misunderstand me quite deliberately. Your interpretations of what I've written are the exactly opposite of what I mean. I don't know why you still do this. You cannot think that it's an effective technique in a debate.

I wish you could show me where I was "threatening" anything about unleashing my academic qualificatons. I actually stated the opposite point of view, questioning their relevance and worth, questioning the value of my background, as an attempt to ligitimize or give more credence to my posts here, and what you do is twist this around to make it sound like I said the opposite and was bragging when I wasn't.

I don't understand your anger and agression, you seem to invest an incredible ammount to emotional energy in the merest trifles, in a theoretical discussion about different versions of Utopia. You seem to enjoy calling me names, odd. Though it's strangely exciting.

I'm convinced I'll never become the Western Empire's dictator so I don't there's too much to worry about on that score. Alas, the worlds' lost it's last, best, chance. Now the only way is down.

It's so tiresome, this habit you have of creating strawman arguments and then demolishing them and attributing them to me. This psuedo-judicial style doesn't impress me at all, and as for your facility with logic...

Your right though about one thing. I suppose I am a kind of "traitor" to the social class I came from.

Your right when you imply that my interest in anarchy had an ulterior motive. I found out, when I was in a band in my desolute youth, that revolutionary girls were far better at... debating than debutants were.

Then, after putting me straight about the fall of Rome, now you then launch into an attack on Marx and his ideas, Wow, old Karl was fortunate not to have bumped into you, he wouldn't have had a leg to stand on!.

writeon's picture

a.m.r.

First there's the Roman Empire you claim to understand, Marx and his myriad, plan as your face, errors; Ye, Gods! Any child could see where he went wrong; then almost as an aside you have fathomed that mere trifle called "human nature"; and finally, right at the end, you see through my facade too! I hang my head. It's terrible to be found out and revealed to waiting world as a sham, But, I protest! Why am I at the end of the list? I need, I want to be first, in front of Marx and Rome. After all, I'm here, alive and dangerous, and their gone! There's so much more damage I can do! I'm just getting started. I think I'll amend my slogan, "The Solution's in the Revolution!" too tame by half. Rather, "Anarchy or Chaos!"

richardgrace819's picture

When the USSR broke up, the apparatus of the bureaucracy remained and learned from the new masters that was the EU. Seeing the apparency demise of the Western ideologies through the bankruptcy of the banking system, think they have come forth to the promised land.
America will revitalise itself when it has a new foe that it understands, and will rebuild whole heartedly. The biggest downside to any army, is getting its troops to actually kill its foe, then return to base and carry on as normal. National Guards in the US are trained for this continguency.
I should of listened to all and sundry that have warned as I read these columns these last few months. NWO is ready for next stage of total totalitarianism forthwith.

Sofiarun's picture

As the match draws to a close and the pool is
thrashing the living socks off the opposition a chant
goes up, “ You’ve all gone quiet over there, you’re all
go quiet over there.” Silence, interesting, … the
opposition has all left. No wait …they’ve all morphed
into one little ant doing his Spiderman impersonation
howling like a subliminal advertising rabbit.

Yea I’ve had yer in me sights for ages mate. Still
you’re on the right track but you need a little help to
get you over the final hurdle. The winning post is in
sight. You need to eat a bit of me Christmas plum
pudding before I call your name and say, ‘Rise sir
Neil, the Second shepherd of the Third Kingdom.’

You see while you bookworms were fighting over the
rubix cube of life surrounded by dead wood with
haphazard markings going on little fact finding
missions, I was out there swimming in oceans of it.
Submerging my whole body and mind. At times it’s
made Orwell’s sojourn in a Paris kitchen appear like
a working holiday on a Caribbean cruise. But at
others like Tommy Smith’s crunching header in the
European Cup final.

And then when I get back I find you’re all still there
squabbling with yourselves on how to get the colours
all lined up. So while you’re in the port-a-loo getting
rid of all the sticky toffee I unstick the colours and put
them in the right places. Childish I know, but
someone had to do it.

Now you know Santa is real and he’s coming. One
more sleep and you too can not only sit under
Buddha’s tree of enlightenment, but climb up to the
top and jump on his sleigh.

And find yourself in a beauty like no other.

Optimist's picture

Writeon, maybe you’re right, perhaps “communism” has never been implemented anywhere by any government. But neither has “capitalism”, arguably, and I know which kind of failed implementation I would rather experience.

And yes, just like modern socialist dictatorships, modern western democracies have unjustly killed a lot of people through military action. Modern western democracies, however, tend not to kill millions of their own people through starvation, disease, and outright murder, which is a significant difference.

Socialist dictatorships generally do not allow people to have debates like the one we are having here. Neither are they well known for producing the kind of technological innovation that has provided the means for us to conduct this debate.

I am sure that neither you, nor any worker’s committee, nor any socialist dictatorship, could do a better job of pricing access to this blog than the market has already.

Personally, I am very happy with the market price of this technology, a price which is almost free at the margin and which was set, not by any central authority, but by millions of freely expressed actions and preferences.

Socialist dictatorships, by definition, disallow freely expressed actions and preferences, usually at the point of a gun.

If you truly believe what you are saying, your participation here is contradictory and hypocritical.

jeremylundgr13's picture

"Your right when you imply that my interest in anarchy had an ulterior motive. I found out, when I was in a band in my desolute youth, that revolutionary girls were far better at... debating than debutants were".

writeon, from what you have wrote I hope you are not one of the "well-meaning" middle/upper class whose fling with an "alternative" lifestyle at university was little more than middle class kids playing poor and living the rest of their lives in subconscious guilt.

From writings you have posted on previous topics you seem to be lamenting a life led in luxury instead of fighting the underlying problems in our society. Would you personally be ready for the effects of a "revolution"? The only way this would really work (as far as I can see) is Zizek's "egalitarianism with a taste of terror", say goodbye to consumer choice and anything remotely bourgeois (design in general) as it is capitalism that makes these things possible.

Forgive my demeanour, I would not assume I am informing you of anything here, more clearing my chest. It is very easy though to sit in an ivory tower and cast your views down to the proletariat and it worries me that this may be the case. You are however spot on with your analysis of democracy. In a world with class divide there can be no democracy as economic circumstance envelops every other facet of humanity. Only when things get very bad (will it take people starving in the streets?) will people want affirmative action, the problem is this can easily lead to the far right alternative as people seek power instead of equality. We stand at a moment not seen for decades, as many have said since the Great Depression. We have the chance to implement radical change if we get the message right, to create a just world where rape and murder and crime are still there but much less pronounced because there isn't such an economic schism smashing any notion of society to pieces. Nobody wants to listen though because consumerism won.

Sofiarun's picture

William
A fascinating analysis that took me a few reading to
understand. Could you please clarify what you mean
by 'total totalitarianism' How is it different from say
partial, semi, and slight totalitarianism? Also I take it
this NWO is the New World Order. What exactly is
this? Will it not be old if it goes to the next stage?

a.m.r.

I'll be with you in a while once I've stopped laughing
from the above and when William provides some
apparency clarity.

Latest tweets