Socialism's comeback

At the beginning of the century, the chances of socialism making a return looked close to zero. Yet now, all around Europe, the red flag is flying again.

 

"If socialism signifies a political and economic system in which the government controls a large part of the economy and redistributes wealth to produce social equality, then I think it is safe to say the likelihood of its making a comeback any time in the next generation is close to zero," wrote Francis Fukuyama, author of The End of History, in Time magazine in 2000.

He should take a trip around Europe today.

Make no mistake, socialism - pure, unadulterated socialism, an ideology that was taken for dead by liberal capitalists - is making a strong comeback. Across the continent, there is a definite trend in which long-established parties of the centre left that bought in to globalisation and neoliberalism are seeing their electoral dominance challenged by unequivocally socialist parties which have not.

The parties in question offer policies which mark a clean break from the Thatcherist agenda that many of Europe's centre-left parties have embraced over the past 20 years. They advocate renationalisation of privatised state enterprises and a halt to further liberalisation of the public sector. They call for new wealth taxes to be imposed and for a radical redistribution of wealth. They defend the welfare state and the rights of all citizens to a decent pension and free health care. They strongly oppose war - and any further expansion of Nato.

Most fundamentally of all, they challenge an economic system in which the interests of ordinary working people are subordinated to those of capital.

Nowhere is this new leftward trend more apparent than in Germany, home to the meteoric rise of Die Linke ("The Left"), a political grouping formed only 18 months ago - and co-led by the veteran socialist "Red" Oskar Lafontaine, a long-standing scourge of big business. The party, already the main opposition to the Christian Democrats in eastern Germany, has made significant inroads into the vote for the Social Democratic Party (SPD) in elections to western parliaments this year, gaining representation in Lower Saxony, Hamburg and Hesse. Die Linke's unapologetically socialist policies, which include the renation alisation of electricity and gas, the banning of hedge funds and the introduction of a maximum wage, chime with a population concerned at the dismantling of Germany's mixed economic model and the adoption of Anglo-Saxon capitalism - a shift that occurred while the SPD was in government.

An opinion poll last year showed that 45 per cent of west Germans (and 57 per cent of east Germans) consider socialism "a good idea"; in October, another poll showed that Germans overwhelmingly favour nationalisation of large segments of the economy. Two-thirds of all Germans say they agree with all or some of Die Linke's programme.

It's a similar story of left-wing revival in neighbouring Holland. There the Socialist Party of the Netherlands (SP), which almost trebled its parliamentary representation in the most recent general election (2006), and which made huge gains in last year's provincial elections, continues to make headway.

Led by a charismatic 41-year-old epidemiologist, Agnes Kant, the SP is on course to surpass the Dutch Labour Party, a member of the ruling conservative-led coalition, as the Netherlands' main left-of centre grouping.

The SP has gained popularity by being the only left-wing Dutch parliamentary party to campaign for a "No" vote during the 2005 referendum on the EU constitutional treaty and for its opposition to large-scale immigration, which it regards as being part of a neoliberal package that encourages flexible labour markets.

The party calls for a society where the values of "human dignity, equality and solidarity" are most prominent, and has been scathing in its attacks on what it describes as "the culture of greed", brought about by "a capitalism based on inflated bonuses and easy money". Like Die Linke, the SP campaigns on a staunchly anti-war platform - demanding an end to Holland's role as "the US's lapdog".

In Greece, the party on the up is the Coalition of the Radical Left (SYRIZA), the surprise package in last year's general election. As public opposition to the neoliberal econo mic policies of the ruling New Democracy government builds, SYRIZA's opinion-poll ratings have risen to almost 20 per cent - putting it within touching distance of PASOK, the historical left-of-centre opposition, which has lurched sharply to the right in recent years. SYRIZA is particularly popular with young voters: its support among those aged 35 and under stands at roughly 30 per cent in the polls, ahead of PASOK.

In Norway, socialists are already in power; the ruling "red-green" coalition consists of the Socialist Left Party, the Labour Party and the Centre Party. Since coming to power three years ago, the coalition - which has been labelled the most left-wing government in Europe, has halted the privatisation of state-owned companies and made further development of the welfare state, public health care and improving care for the elderly its priorities.

The success of such forces shows that there can be an electoral dividend for left-wing parties if voters see them responding to the crisis of modern capitalism by offering boldly socialist solutions. Their success also demonstrates the benefits to electoral support for socialist groupings as they put aside their differences to unite behind a commonly agreed programme.

For example, Die Linke consists of a number of internal caucuses - or forums - including the "Anti-Capitalist Left", "Communist Platform" and "Democratic Socialist Forum". SYRIZA is a coalition of more than ten Greek political groups. And the Dutch Socialist Party - which was originally called the Communist Party of the Netherlands, has successfully brought socialists and communists together to support its collectivist programme.

It is worth noting that those European parties of the centre left which have not fully embraced the neoliberal agenda are retaining their dominant position. In Spain, the governing Socialist Workers' Party has managed to maintain its broad left base and was re-elected for another four-year term in March, with Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero promising a "socialist economic policy" that would focus on the needs of workers and the poor.

There are exceptions to the European continent's shift towards socialism. Despite the recent election of leftist Martine Aubry as leader of the French Socialist Party, the French left has been torn apart by divisions, at the very moment when it could be exploiting the growing unpopularity of the Sarkozy administration.

And, in Britain, despite opinion being argu ably more to the left on economic issues than at any time since 1945, few are calling for a return to socialism.

The British left, despite promising initiatives such as September's Convention of the Left in Manchester, which gathered representatives from several socialist groups, still remains fragmented and divided. The left's espousal of unrestricted or loosely controlled immigration is also, arguably, a major vote loser among working-class voters who should provide its core support. No socialist group in Britain has as yet articulated a critique of mass immigration from an anti-capitalist and anti-racist viewpoint in the way the Socialist Party of the Netherlands has.

And even if a Die Linke-style coalition of progressive forces could be built and put on a formal footing in time for the next general election, Britain's first-past-the-post system provides a formidable obstacle to change.

Nevertheless, the prognosis for socialism in Britain and the rest of Europe is good. As the recession bites, and neoliberalism is discredited, the phenomenon of unequivocally socialist parties with clear, anti-capitalist, anti-globalist messages gaining ground, and even replacing "Third Way" parties in Europe, is likely to continue.

Even in Britain, where the electoral system grants huge advantage to the established parties, pressure on Labour to jettison its commitment to neoliberal policies and to adopt a more socialist agenda is sure to intensify.

307 comments

Nilsey105's picture

The sooner schools reopen the better.

writeon's picture

An ant marched across the face of the Mona Lisa
Its antennae accutely aware of all that was around
A cobweb, a fly, a tiny, tiny, grain of sand
Always onward, through a strange, stange, land

writeon's picture

Tom,

Most people, all over Europe, don't hate Americans. Witness the outpouring of warmth and joy at the victory of Obama, his glorious appearance in Berlin. 90% of Germans would have voted or him if they'ed been given the chance. Gordon Browne loves Ameican. Sarkozy adores the United States. American culture, films, music, writers are incredibly popular. People can't get enough of it.

But what people can't stand is the American "ruling class" when it's unleashed on the world, for example, Bush the Butcher of Baghdad. He, unfairly in my opinion, is regarded as a dangerous and stupid loon, a half-crazed sheriff leading a posse of lunatics from an asylum on a fools errand to rid the world of evil.

Why do Europeans despise Bush and the ruling class? Basically because Europe is very Social Democratic and the US ruling elite isn't. They are perceived as arrogant, dangerous and ultra-right-wing.

Nilsey105's picture

writeon

thankfully you have regathered your thoughts, well said.

a.m.r.'s picture

Marxist socialist goverments killed over 100 million of their own people in the 20th century in attempts to socially engineer their vision of a fair society. All of them ended in failure.

I find this appalling and relevant. I'm sorry you don't.

Sofiarun's picture

the origin of capitalism:
In order to survive a human being has to be able to
eat and drink. He has to possess that food and
water. He cannot share the food and water that
enters his body with other people. The food and
water are his own private property.

There is a minimum that he needs. If there is only a
minimum available for one person sharing the food
between two people will result in the death of both of
them. If ever such a situation occurs whoever has
the means of acquiring (production) that food and
water and consuming (distributing) he survives.

Profit: the excess or property left over after
consumption.

If there is more than individual needs he has extra,
he posses more than needs at that given time. Some
other individual comes along in need and demands
that extra (the origin of socialism). Should he give it?
Would you give it knowing that in about three hours
time you’ll be needing it? Knowing that if you didn’t
find anything else in that time you’ll suffer, and be
closer to death? And you also know that your
environment doesn’t yield hardly anything so the
chance of acquisition is minimal.

The First Shepherd of the Third Kingdom

Is your answer yes, no or three bags full?

a.m.r.'s picture

To put it more simply, democracies with a capitalist free markets have proven themselves to be the best producers combined with having the highest standards of human rights and so have been best placed to provide social welfare, whether for themselves or for other nations abroad.

Other systems, like marxist socialism, communism and fascism, all of which subjugate the individual to a much greater degree to serving what may be, by themselves, noble goals, have all ended up as failures, often with disastrous consequences for the people involved.

fairplay's picture

whatever banner these new socialist parties fly, the fact of the matter is there will still be an elite cabal running things whether there are socialists/communists or outright facists in power and they will be the same people as they have always been. and if things dont go to their liking they will change them around.

no point in arguing. thats just how it is

a.m.r.'s picture

The First shepherd of the Third Kingdom,

I would, but I'd ask him if he can also help us find more food, and maybe get sit together and think of whether we can come up with better methods of producing more food.

Someone like writeon, of course, after I'd spent six hours chasing and finally catching that rabbit, would probably call me a rich capitalist pig, and try to hang me and take my rabbit. I object to that.

a.m.r.'s picture

stateswoman: "..rapidly changing demographies, such as we have been witnessing in the last decades, clearly call for re-defined and re-designed economic systems [..] It must be eminently clear that certain concepts of 'elite group' ownership of capital can no longer be viable in the swiftly changing society that we have become [..] In conclusion, therefore, we need to sing a Requiem to egotistic individualism and the reign of 'elite minorities' even when we, ourselves, become the victims of this change."

stateswoman, could you briefly describe how the new society will work and look like? How will it prevent the formation of elite minorities?

When you say we need to say good-bye to egotistic individualism, I assume you don't want to be rid of individualism altogether. By what mechanism will we move from egotistic to non-egotistic (altruistic) individualism?

Latest tweets