Return to: Home | Life & Society | Education

BBC's Oxbridge bias

Rachael Jolley

Published 12 November 2008

Isn't it time for the BBC to grasp the nettle of its outrageous pro-Oxbridge bias and stop permitting those institutions an upper hand on University Challenge?

Oxbridge is synonymous with the UK establishment

Question: Which BBC quiz programme thinks Oxford and Cambridge are so much better than every other university in the country they're allowed to enter as many teams as they fancy?

Answer: University Challenge.

Thanks to Obama - and the American people - change is the buzzword of the day, so surely it must be time for the BBC to examine a long-running and deep inequality?

Simply put, this is the idea that all universities are created equal, except for Oxford and Cambridge.

These two elite institutions are each allowed to enter multiple teams into the intellectual battlefield that is the popular and long-running BBC quiz programme.

Other universities are limited to just one set of geeky students, or competitors if you will.

In the interests of fairness, the 21st century, and the Obama presidency it is time for us to challenge that bastion of privilege, and ask the BBC to clean up its act, and give every university in the country the same treatment. It's right, it's fair, and you know Mr Obama would approve.

Through the years there have been challenges to the established UC system and attempts to overthrow it. Famously in 1975 a truly doughty Manchester University team - that included journalist David Aaronovitch - chose to come on to the programme, and register its disgust for the Oxbridge rule by answering every question with the answer “Karl Marx”, “Trotsky” or “Lenin".

Their rebellion was not successful. And University Challenge carried on regardless of fashion for that hippy thing, you know, giving everyone a fair go or - as we might put in the modern age - the level playing field.

Nothing would change the mind of those BBC bosses. This was a point of principle and they were prepared to fight on for their great tradition of letting Oxbridge make it to virtually every single semi and final.

But what can the justification be in this meritocratic age?

Oxford and Cambridge get to have repeated entries because, well, they're just better?

They have to let every single tiny college of the Oxbridge variety enter their own team because they just do, or - maybe - because that's where controllers of the BBC go to study?

Perhaps the Oxbridge student is just easier on the eye?

Or maybe it is because Oxbridge students have better haircuts or they have more likelihood of getting into the Civil Service faststream or getting jobs on the telly, like our very own Mr Paxman.

Let's face it none of these add up to a compelling argument for the BBC's legendary fairness.

There is some sort of odd rule that has been used to justify this very strange system decade after decade.

This is to say that Oxford and Cambridge have a very special collegiate system, so every single college should be allowed to enter a team. But most other universities which also have colleges do not get this privilege – for there is something about them not being proper colleges in an Oxbridgy kind of way, which means they don't qualify. So tiny little Corpus Christi with its 85 undergraduates per year can submit its own team, and so can Sheffield University with its 24,000 students. Just one each.

Now there are those that might argue that University College London or the London School of Economics get to enter separate teams – and they are both part of the wider system of the University of London network.

I say, nitpicking indeed. We all know that UCL and LSE are in fact proper standalone universities with thousands of students. So pouf to that defence.

So let's hear it for change, for hope, for fairness and a new era at every university throughout the land, where students can celebrate being separate but equal to Oxford and Cambridge.

Let the winds of change blow through the bastions of privilege and may the BBC reach out and show it is not giving favours to the establishment.

It's time to change the rules of University Challenge to give everyone a fair chance, wherever they studied.

It may very well be that Oxford or Cambridge will still have a winning team every few years, but at least no-one will mind, or not so much.

And to quote that very positive hip-hop star Dizzee Rascal in conversation with Mr Paxman “everything takes time”, but dear reader that time is here.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

12 comments from readers

mgarthwaite
12 November 2008 at 13:07

I have always like UC because it is totally irrelevant .

The questions are so out of the sphere of most

peoples interests and more akin to mastermind than

general knowledge.

On the flip side it's not great viewing when you have

two teams (I think of Bath and LSE), both good

universities and you see LSE whitewash poor Bath.

I say let the Oxbridge type show how irrelevant they

really are.

Carl Jones
12 November 2008 at 16:47

Recently I saw a MSM report which claimed 50%+ of Cambridge students had cheated at university. I believe the numbers are higher for job applications, CV`s and answers to interview questions.

I suppose its all good practice for a life in politics, MSM journalism, fast-track high flying police and becoming a Freemason and I contrast this with a very sinister big brother radio ad I heard today, about catching benefit cheats. The last out-going head of the FSA said the City of London was as corrupt as ever.LOL

I think the real lesson to be learnt about UC, is that so many clever people can screw up our world so much....surely its got to be a conspiracy (therory)?lol

Jonny Mac
12 November 2008 at 17:16

"Famously in 1975 a truly doughty Manchester University team - that included journalist David Aaronovitch - chose to come on to the programme, and register its disgust for the Oxbridge rule by answering every question with the answer “Karl Marx”, “Trotsky” or “Lenin"."

You're thinking about an episode of the Young Ones, aren't you?

"So tiny little Corpus Christi with its 85 undergraduates per year can submit its own team, and so can Sheffield University with its 24,000 students. Just one each."

Hmmm. The fact that Corpus would probably beat Sheffield should tell you something about the relative academic and intellectual standing of Oxbridge and the rest.

"It may very well be that Oxford or Cambridge will still have a winning team every few years, but at least no-one will mind, or not so much."

Love, if Oxford and Cambridge could put in one Uni-wide team each rather than college-wide teams, the final would be Oxford v Cambridge every poxy year. Would you want that?

Nilsey105
12 November 2008 at 18:37

More importantly;

Isn't it time for the BBC to grasp the nettle of its outrageous pro-Oxbridge bias and stop employing those from those institutions.

Carl Jones
12 November 2008 at 21:14

Nilsey105;....golly gosh...how on earth do you expect MI6 to control the BBC Today team?LOL

john problem
13 November 2008 at 09:22

When will people finally grasp the nettle and realise that we Oxbridge folk are, simply put, a ton brighter? And more witty. And better looking. And richer. And have cleaner hair. And get on better in life. For less hard work. No 'Per ardua ad Astra' for us, what?

Chiltern2000
13 November 2008 at 10:00

How can so much energy can be devoted to an issue so trivial? UC is meant as enterrtainment and is not meant to be representative of real life.

HH
13 November 2008 at 11:30

So University Challenge has taken the two most competitive universities and forced them to split their talent into about 60 college pools instead of getting the four most knowledgeable students from each university. Doesn't that make it harder for them to win?

Viscount Firm
13 November 2008 at 12:29

As someone who followed fourteen generations of his family to Oxford - where I studied shouting - I'm PERSONALLY VERY OFFENDED BY RACHAEL JOLLEY'S VILE ASSAULT. IN JEREMY PAXMAN SHE'S TALKING ABOUT AN INSTITUTION THAT'S AS OLD AS CHRISTENDOM ITSELF. PROBABLY OLDER.

margaret
13 November 2008 at 15:14

Dear Jonny Mac

No, the author is not thinking of an episode of the Young Ones, this incident did occur. And the fact that you so arrogantly assume you are right about this highlights the paucity of your following arguments. The fact is if you can enter 10 teams and your opponents can only enter one, then you have a greater chance of making it through. Quizzes are always about luck to a certain extent.

the fair way forward would be to allow all unversities to enter a certain number of teams; say 5 or 6, which would mean that the oxbridge ones would have to organise heats that let the winners through. It would also mean UC having more pre-televised heats, but I am sure that is insuperable problem.

voiceofreason
16 November 2008 at 11:01

Dear Margaret

What would be the difference between each university entering '5 or 6 teams' or entering just one? The playing field is levelled either way. It just makes for a longer, more drawn out process of heats, where one team from each non-Oxbridge university will get through, and all 6 from Oxford and Cambridge, ending up with a similar contest as now stands.

Secondly, the Oxbridge Collegiate system IS different (aside from education and application process): the rivalry between colleges is immense, so the accolade of winning UC sits firmly with the college who succeed, not the University as a whole.

TimFootman
08 December 2008 at 02:15

Sorry, a little late to the fray. But BBC bosses' response

to the Manchester team in 1975 would have been pretty

irrelevant, since the show was on ITV at the time.

Tim Footman (quarter-finals, 1987)

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker