Chávez to nationalise gold reserves
The Venezuelan President, Hugo Chávez, has announced plans to renationalise the country's gold.
By Sophie FitzMaurice Published 18 August 2011
The Venezuelan President, Hugo Chávez, has said he will nationalise the country's gold mines and convert gold into international currency reserves. As the US and European currencies founder, many investors are turning towards gold as a "safe haven". Gold is now valued at $1,795, or £1,084, an ounce.
Chávez's moves also have an ideological aspect: the socialist president wishes to invest his country's reserves in some of the so-called 'BRIC' economies - Brazil, Russia and China - that he considers friendly to his regime. He has criticised global dependency on the dollar in the past, and his nationalisation of the gold industry will be seen as a step away from reliance on the US currency. The move will make China, in particular, happy.
Next month, Venezuelans will see a ten per cent wage increase, after a raise increase of 15 per cent in May. The average monthly salary in Venezuela is now £220. Although the Venezuelan economy is suffering from extremely high inflation, at 25 per cent a year, the rising price of oil has benefitted South America's largest exporter of oil.
Venezuela has recently introduced price controls in an effort to curb inflation and ensure affordable healthcare, passing a Law for Fair Costs and Prices. Private healthcare facilities earlier this week agreed to a three-week price freeze, as the government seeks to shore up its stretched public health system.
Chávez, who is seeking re-election next year, announced the plans for the renationalisation of gold on state television, upsetting the Canadian-based, Russian-owned company Rusoro - the only foreign firm involved in the Venezuelan gold industry.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


6 comments
Oh dear looks like JP morg could be in a bit of doo doo if chavez moves all his gold.
Would that be a shame.
Please can we at least call this what it is? It is not nationalisation. It is theft.
There's seems to be a bit of a contradiction here between cosying up to the Russians and upsetting them by nationalising gold?
How can nationalisation of it's own people assets be defined as theft?
Have heard Max Keiser on RTV echo same- and while one sympathises with these ideals at this time of structural global financial corruption.and inequity
The longer term consequences of calls for a return to a semi- gold standard as global reserve- would by practical consequence of , inevitably lead to the same traditional elite ownership of capital by dubious virtue of fixed gold and the logical lack of any creative growth that such a semi-return would herald. We only need to look back to 1923 to see why the gold standard meant precisly the reverse of what the admirable,imo, Chavez and Keiser would as progressives wish. Money is the lifeblood of a holistic organic corporate community based on the human self with social contract therin. Gold is merely an accessorary that cannot benefit growth or redistributive health of the whole and needs financially, as many on FT have commented on , to be seen of little but static or narciistic juvenile worth.
Smart move by Chavez to maintain control over their gold supply. As it's physically removed from various global banks, how will they cope?
If gold breaks "The Great $2,000 an oz. Boundary", is it still a safe investment? Like other commodities, there's a limited amount. Haven't heard of many new gold mines opening up worldwide. Is there a new global currency to replace the Stateside dollar? Not yet. Realistically it will take several years to establish it. Also, to convince various global market players that it's time to dump dollars.
Why haven't the Chinese sold all of their Stateside debt? They still see some value in holding it and using their foreign currency reserve for global investments. Name a country: The States, various African countries, Afghanistan and others. Despite their inflation, they still have a steadier and better overall growth rate than the States do. Why is Biden in Beijing? To make sure their creditor stays happy, that's why.
As Tariq Ali states. The Brits need to default on debt. It's the right thing to do and it says no more parasitical plutocrats.
Post new comment