Crash: The housing crisis is just beginning

As Britain wakes up to the nightmare of negative equity, we are facing a housing recession far worse

Kingston Quay in Glasgow is one of the smart dockside developments that were supposed to help regenerate Britain's older industrial cities. The blocks don't look bad, with generous balconies and double-height penthouses. But the truth is that you can hardly give these flats away. A two-bedroom flat, bought for £215,000 in September 2005, recently sold at auction for £79,000; another went for £86,000. Nine others did not sell at all. "Live the dream," said the promotion for these developments; wake up to the nightmare of negative equity.

This story is being replicated in every city in the country as the housing crash gathers momentum. In areas of Manchester and Leeds, and even parts of London, thousands of new-build flats are being offloaded at auction for 30 per cent less than they cost to buy, according to the auctioneers Allsop. The paradox of Britain's slump is that it isn't being led by a sub-prime underclass in run-down areas - although repossessions are rising fast everywhere - but by the "luxury" end of the market. The biggest falls are for the dinky flats bought by urban professionals as "starter homes", or by well-off parents, such as the Blairs, for their children and as pensions. If you have had the misfortune to invest in any of these, look away now, because what follows could seriously damage your wealth.

Let's get the numbers out of the way first. There is no longer a scintilla of doubt that there is a major, national housing correction under way. Nationwide registered a record 2.5 per cent fall in May alone. Analysts such as Morgan Stanley think there could be a 25 per cent decline in two years. The International Monetary Fund estimates that British house prices are overvalued by 30 per cent. A crash is defined as a 20 per cent fall over two years, so fasten your seat belts. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) says a million people face losing their homes over the next 18 months. Northern Rock was the first banking casualty; the buy-to-let flat specialist Bradford & Bingley is the second; others will follow as this second mortgage-related financial shock shreds banking balance sheets and undermines confidence in the financial system.

Even the government accepts that prices will fall by between 5 and 10 per cent this year alone, as the housing minister Caroline Flint's see-through cabinet briefing papers revealed recently (although, curiously, she didn't see fit to tell the country the news herself). Indeed, the government is still actively encouraging first-time buyers into a market that it knows is collapsing. Ministers should be doing precisely the reverse: warning young families not to take on mortgages for flats that will assuredly land them in negative equity.

But the government still believes that, as the property porn queen Kirstie Allsopp puts it, "house prices always go up". In other words, it believes in fairies, and that money grows on trees. Now comes the big bad wolf to the door, and the last thing anyone should think of doing right now is buying a house. At any price. Just say no. You have been warned.

Tens of thousands of relatively high-income homeowners in south-east England have placed their futures in jeopardy by taking on unsustainable jumbo mortgages. You need only look at estate agents' windows to see that the sums don't add up - London prices average £320,000 and are out of all proportion to ability to pay. Gross median full-time earnings in London last year were only £587 a week, according to government statistics. Many young families took out self-certification "liar loans" at five or six times their income as the only way to get on to the housing ladder. Now the banks are forcing them to remortgage at a higher rate and demanding large deposits. Real fear is stalking the capital's nappy valleys.

This is going to be far, far worse than the housing recession of 1990-92. Fuelled by irresponsible bank lending, UK house prices nearly tripled in the decade to 2007 - a more lunatic rise even than in America. British prices have been running at nearly eight times average earnings against a historic average of 3.5. This was never going to be sustainable. But right at the moment the bubble burst, in August 2007, a combination of related events conspired to turn this boom into an epic bust that is likely to consume the British economy and lead to a depression. You may think the credit crisis is over, but the real crisis is just beginning.

First, the banks found that because of the US sub-prime mess they couldn't borrow cheap money on the international markets any more, so they cut back on lending and increased rates. Banks such as Northern Rock, which had been offering "suicide loans" of up to 120 per cent loan-to-value, stopped lending altogether. Not surprisingly, people stopped buying. The number of first-time buyers in March was the lowest ever recorded, fewer than 18,000 in the whole of the UK.

Apoplexy in No 10

Even before the housing slump, buy-to-let investors were losing money because of low rents; now many are being forced to sell, as the banks require them to remortgage at rates of up to 9 per cent. Overall, mortgage lending this year is expected to fall by nearly half, to £60bn, an unprecedented contraction of the market. Estate agents across the land are shutting shop - not that many tears will be shed at their plight. Nor at the loss of the hard-sell property club Inside Track, which promised to make you a millionaire overnight and has now gone bust, leaving many of its clients with huge losses.

The FSA and the police are now investigating 70 separate valuation scams across Britain whereby surveyors fraudulently overestimated the value of thousands of new-build homes. In cities such as Manchester, organised criminals had recycled drug money into property to such good effect that some of them gave up the narcotics trade and turned to property speculation. Now they are regretting it.

What can the government do? Well, Gordon Brown thought he could revive the market by in effect handing £50bn of public money to the banks through the Special Liquidity Scheme and by leaning on the Bank of England to cut interest rates. Not so. The banks took the £50bn in Treasury swaps in April and promptly put mortgage rates up even further. Then in May, Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, announced that there were likely to be no more cuts in interest rates this year because of rising inflation.

This caused apoplexy in No 10. Brown wanted King to emulate Ben Bernanke of the US Federal Reserve, who slashed rates from more than 5.25 to just 2 per cent in eight months. But King stood his ground, and is right to do so. As anyone who goes to the shops knows only too well, the cost of living is rising faster than at any time in the past two decades. Cutting interest rates now could start 1970s-style hyperinflation.

There has been much debate about the causes of the recent global inflation in commodities, but in the end, in the circular world of economics, it all comes back to housing. It was the attempt by the Federal Reserve to revive the US housing market that ignited the current commodities boom. It hoped that slashing interest rates below inflation would encourage people to put their money back into houses. It didn't. Instead, the big investment houses, the pension funds and thousands of in dividuals ploughed their cash into oil, food - anything that looked as if it might become scarce. Roughly 60 per cent of the recent increase in the cost of oil is down to speculation.

In the US, cutting interest rates has actually made house prices fall faster. The increase in gas and food costs has made consumers tighten their belts and avoid mortgages like the plague. US residential property prices fell 14.4 per cent in the first quarter of 2008 - the fastest drop ever recorded by the benchmark Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index. Ten million face negative equity. To top it all, the inflation explosion has forced the Fed to admit that the next movement in US rates will probably be up, though not before the presidential election. Talk about a rock and a hard place. Increasing interest rates in a downturn is what turns recession into depression.

How long will the slump last? Certain demographic factors may prolong the housing depression. The baby-boom generation has now reached retirement age and many couples are relying on their homes as pensions and legacies. If they want to keep their wealth intact, they will have to sell soon. This could lead to an unprecedented number of larger houses coming on the market just at the moment when younger families can't borrow the money to buy them.

Pyramid of credit

The recent house-price boom in Britain has also been fuelled by immigration, much of it from Poland. With the British economy weakening and the pound falling in value, however, many eastern European migrants are returning home. There is still a shortage of houses in Britain, but we are about to find that the shortage is not as great as we thought.

Are falling house prices a bad thing? All things being equal, a return to sanity in the housing market is good for everyone, even estate agents. But we are facing a serious economic dis location here, not just a correction.

It was brought about by the astonishing short-sightedness of central bankers and politicians in Britain and the US who kept interest rates artificially low for more than a decade. A huge inverted pyramid of credit was built on top of the expectation of yields from British and US mortgages. Believing that house prices would rise for ever, and that even if they faltered the Bank of England would cut interest rates to reinflate the bubble, the banks began to lose any sense of financial risk, and started to relax credit standards and lend irresponsibly. Private-equity firms were allowed to borrow huge multiples of their real assets. Banks started to hide their lending in off-balance-sheet devices such as structured investment vehicles.

As house prices fall, this all turns into reverse. Loans de-leverage, derivatives degrade, margin calls are missed. The total value of British residential property is about £3trn. Nearly £1trn of this will now disappear over the next few years if prices fall by 30 per cent. This will have a profoundly deflationary effect, leading to falling high-street sales, business closures, personal bankruptcies and rising unemployment. Mortgage bonds will default, causing further bank crises. Britain depends heavily on the financial services for jobs and 40,000 are about to go in the City alone, according to J P Morgan.

In Britain, homeowners are seeing the value of their properties fall at about £2,000 a month at the same time as the cost of living is rising and their wages and salaries are stagnant. Deluded by house prices, British consumers borrowed and spent like there was no tomorrow. Unfortunately, tomorrow has arrived and consumers are sitting on £1.4trn of debt, the highest for any country in the world. People can no longer defer their loans by remortgaging their properties, and the banks are demanding cash upfront. In the past two months, many consumers have taken out huge one-off credit-card loans, which explains the paradox of recent unsecured lending going up as spending goes down. Shelter has reported that at least a million people are putting mortgage payments on their credit cards - the height of economic madness.

The government is already overdrawn and unable to spend its way out of impending recession. Treasury finances will shrivel after a fall in stamp duty and tax receipts from the collapsing financial services sector. The nationalised Northern Rock has signalled that it won't be able to repay the £26bn it was lent by the government if house prices continue to fall.

No wonder Gordon Brown is looking gloomy. He once joked that there are two kinds of chancellors: failures and those who get out in time. He is no longer chancellor, but as First Lord of the Treasury, the Prime Minister is still in the firing line. The great housing bust of 2008, and the recession that follows it, will be Brown's lasting monument. And poor old prudence never got a look-in.

Iain Macwhirter is an award-winning political columnist for the Glasgow Herald

Housing by numbers

  • 250,000

    UK households in negative equity

  • 50%

    fall in net mortgage lending expected

    this year (down from

    £108bn to £55bn)

  • 12m

    mortgages outstanding in 2007

  • 25%

    predicted average house-price drop during current crash

  • 3,775

    mortgage products available now

  • 15,599

    mortgage products available in July 2007

  • Research by Katie Wake

81 comments

VC's picture

Wembley71, its not about how the mechanism works....it is a mechanism and you are selective with the truth.

Britain has had record year on year immigration for a decade...I`d love to quote numbers, but no one seems to know, or wants to know the truth. This immigration along with cheap reckless credit has over inflated the property market...of course....

....the capitalist system requires a theater with no limits...an ever increasing population, unlimited land....I could go on, but these two points alone are enough. Britain is a small island (as stated above), so in order to make capitalism work, everyone must suffer. We don`t need immigrants....out of all the developed nations, Britain is the least productive, we have policies designed to breakup families, we have a generation of children who have no idea what a proper family relationship is, a generation of feminized young men who have never had a male role model....women have become the largest protest group as men wrangle with the CSA.

I can`t believe your last paragraph; a few years (longer) ago the Newstatesman carried a major front page article calling for a revolution in land ownership....this was based on the last property crash. Nothing has changed. You don`t own your home until its paid for....before the crash, the average age of the first time buyer (London/South East) was 41 with no deposit, provided they take on no extra debt and on a typical mortgage term of 25 years, they will be 66 years old when they own their home.

This rasis another issue. average life expectancy stats aren`t true. Oh, I`m sure some are living longer, but not as many as they`d like you to believe. Where are all these old people...? In old peoples homes spoofing their property wealth....if you aren`t in the property trap, the establishment can`t take their cut, if the state funded care, the establishment couldn`t take their cut. If we lived in a society with properly funded benefits, lots of state housing and a decent healthcare system....we wouldn`t need insurance! Sure, we can have businesses...real businesses....for goodness sake get rid of thse monstrous Investment Banks, get rid of these pension funds who will NEVER payout what they promiss.

Just imagine a world without the City of London and Wall Street? We don`t need them, we can save ourselves a fortune by cutting them out of the loop. The banksters would love you to believe they create wealth....they don`t. All they do is pray on people who have built a reasonable sized business and all they are looking for is floatation or merger, sack some staff, collect their fat bonus.

Take a good look at our world and tell me what you see....what do you see that was built with capitalist intent and is worth looking at....there isn`t much. There is nothing wrong with trade, manufacturing, technology, invention and hard work....this was going on before we had the BIG UGLY MONEY GRABBING BANKS.

The rot started when the Rothschilds started controlling our governments through war funding. Since then they have never lost control. The public have been brianwashed into believing they hold wealth, so you can see why they stopped making shows like Dynasty...I doubt the budgets could keep pace and if they did make programmes showing how the rich really live, the capitalist illusion would be shattered and the public would realise how grim their lives really were.

Today I was chatting to a very nice Canadian chap about the class system. I told him that "working class" means you have to go to work on a regular basis, thats why its called "WORKING CLASS". Middle class is where you don`t have to work, you may work, you may have interests, but you don`t have to work. This truth has been turned on its head by the NWO brainwashing MSM....the majority of people believe they are middle class....what a laff.....if you work through need, you are "working class".LOL

PS, maybe the NS should dig out that article on "land ownership" and run it again. I`ve got it somwhere in a box.LOL

Colonel Blimp's picture

It's nice to have a giggle.

genecrabtree920's picture

Oh Carl you are just such a raving fantasist. You wont answer any of my questions because you know full well that your opinions are pathetically weak intellectually and you couldnt defend them in a serious debate against anyone. So instead of asking you more questions and debating you in a way which shows how nutty you are, Im just going to make fun of you.

"I told him that "working class" means you have to go to work on a regular basis, thats why its called "WORKING CLASS"."

So, I suppose that makes you "middle class", does it Carl? Because my understanding is that youve never done a serious days work in your life, unless you count selling big issues, which I dont count because I consider it to be charity.

"in order to make capitalism work, everyone must suffer."
I think what youre saying here, Carl, is that youre suffering. Not everyone else is. Im personally having a great time. I spend a good third of my life on exotic asian beaches with the girlfriend drinking mango juice. Most people enjoy their lives. Most people arent chronically overweight, and most people dont spend their days selling magazines that no one reads for people who take pity on them. Get a life, Carl. And get an intellect too.

taghioff.info's picture

Uuuhmm I think this discussion has turned just slightly Ad Hominem. Perhaps Carl Jones and Antileft could swap emails and trade abuse with each other in private?

taghioff.info's picture

Actually sorry Carl it is antileft who is being generally obnoxious.

Anti-left, I think you should calm it down or the moderators should consider banning you.

As for housing, the topic is too depressing. Even with a "crash" I see little prospect of my generation seeing affordable housing in the UK, which is a good reason to emigrate.

VC's picture

Looks like I touched a nerve....in the last email that I sent NS web-editor Ben Davis, I offered to do lunch....such a shame that Ben didn`t accept the offer, then he could verify that I work....maybe I should send him my business card.LOL

I actually get rather fed up with BIG ISSUE sellers as I drive about in London...usually on the Northside of Vauxhall bridge....all I can say is thank God for aircon!!!lol
BTW, the only thing I`m suffering from is your rightwing simpleton abuse!lol Maybe the NS should do a collection for treatment?:)
To the genuinely interested, I found this link.
hhtp://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=125669
"Drinking mango juice" and chatting to the ---------- bar---.lol

"Most people enjoy their lives"....one third of British men have a criminal record, half of Brits are on, or have been on anti-depressants most of our youth are binge drinking, or high on drugs and white collar crime is so high the police pretend to be busy with RTA`s......
....sure, for some strange reason, the NWO brainwashing hasn`t affected me yet.....oh dear, its just gone 6pm....time for claret.lol

DCarins's picture

Ah yes taghiof, the perfect response - emigration. Maybe you could join the queue of other splitters and deserters who have also found that other countries have plenty of housing problems too?

Why are we so obsessed with owning freehold titles? Most owner-occupiers appear to move home once or twice (anyone know any figures?) so the permanence of a freehold doesn't seem to matter; and then we seem to have accepted that the profit made on selling a house will pay for our care when we're old and infirm (because we either haven't bothered to have children, or they've p*ssed off and abandoned us). Either way, if we know we're going to sell a house, why bother with freehold?

On a longterm lease you get security, you can modify your property, and you can renegotiate your lease to take into account any improvements to the property you have made. And it's a lot cheaper. It's just we're obsessed with not spending "dead money", even if it means paying twice the value of the house in interest to a bank over the length of the mortgage.

Redview's picture

Carl.

A rise in factory gate prices suggests that inflation is on its way. We are therefore not entering even a recession. Unless you are suggesting that we are in for a dose of 70s' style stagflation. This however is quite different from a depression when the price of everything collapsed along with banks. By the way banks are already recapitalising (check out the interest rates on savings) and in the States which is one year on from us in terms of the crisis unemployment is rising at 50,000 a month while in past recessions it has risen at 200,000 per month.

I haven't got my head in the sand- things are going to get unpleasant all I'm saying is we're not heading for a depression - The growth rate in China is still at approx 6-8% p.a. and the oil states are accumulating trillions of dollars from the oil bubble- what are they going to do with the money ?

Don't forget no western economy including the U.S. is yet in negative territory in respect of growth. Even if house prices fell by 30% it would put house prices back to where they were in November 2004 - a 50% drop ( which is unlikely in my view) would put house price back to where they were in 2002.

I just wish we weren't all so bi-polar on this issue.

hunertin's picture

To james54864618

A considered and reasoned response, if you don;t fell patronised by my saying so. The only flaw I can find in what you're saying is that you are quoting an interest rate of 9%.

It isn't. As it goes, I've just remortgaged that first London flat I bought... B2L rates are around 6.5%, first time buyer rates on fixed/discount deals are markedly lower.

Even so, you're right that you could end up paying around £1000 a month for an interest only mortgage on the flat you can rent for £800, pushing your costs up to around a third of your net income...

...but... it takes a while for rent increases to show, partly because contracts are usually 6 months at least, partly because landlords (especially those who's properties are not 'top notch') often don't push up rents for good, regular-paying tenants, at least until they themselves are forced to remortgage to higher rates...

..and, besides, London is a weird and special case... its transport infrastructure means the commuter-zone into London is more than 60 miles in all directions (the population within the M25 doubles in office hours).

You probably could afford to buy - tens of thousands in the capital couldn't - and you may (stress may) be advised to wait for a 're-adjustment' in prices, which could well be the same or slightly less in a year's time. But even if you did buy, so long as you fix your mortgage rate, you'll be fine to ride out any market slide so long as you don't have to sell, and don't lose your job... two pretty major considerations which caused the mid 90's crash and which are not - yet - likely scenarios at the moment.

You seem shocked that prices have tripled in 10 years, and you are right to point out that's over the average 7%PA increase... you'd be right to expect a correction, although at least some of that increase is itself a correction on the previous 10 years...

...but at 7% increase PA, how long do you think it takes for house prices to double? 10 years, that's all, once you factor in compounding.

A helpful, bizarre mathematical quirk for you, called the rule of 72. To find out the time (in years) it takes prices to double at a given interest rate, divide 72 by the rate... or alternatively divide 72 by the time it takes to double to give you the rate of increase.

Prices tripling in 10 years is 'only' a 14.1% year-on-year increase (less if you compound monthly, which is actually what happens)... so, well over the average, but not quite demanding of the huge adjustment you say (particularly considering the 'crash' aka 'blip' in the predecing decade...

you are right, I think, to suggest that the current downturn will take a while to turn around, measured in years not months... but in general terms (at least outside London's execeptional though important market) the broad economics of buying over renting are solid enough that investors are not likely to sell... and there is a much larger and more democratised private rented sector now than in the 90's (by which I mean people in average jobs who've used their own equity growth to buy one or two rental properties).

Last, like you I went into rented accommodation post uni, and of course that's most people's first experience. But... those who've been in rented for a few years are still getting older, getting partners, getting wed, getting divorced... unless the age at which people move out from home increases, then the number of people entering the housing market as a buyer or tenant will remain about the same.

You and your partner have not bought, but neither do you live in a bedsit with your other post-uni mates, nor do you live with your extended family... whether you choose to rent or buy... either way, you are in a home owned by someone who can afford it, and the next wave of post-grad, post-flatshare people can't live there until you step out to the suburbs, or a 3-bed place for your 2 new kids, or to your two one-bed studios of you, god forbid, should separate. Hey, if your landlord can't actually afford it and you get evicted as a part of his/her repossession, then that puts even more pressure on the rental sector... you become more prospective tenants competing for less available rented housing.

I'm not going to join your inlaws in encouraging you to buy, but I will point out that if you had bought in 2005, you're current property value would 'probably' be sufficient that your putative home didn't fall below the price that you paid for it... meanwhile, if your landlord decides to sell up, you may well struggle to find another 2 bed in one 3 at £800pcm by the time you're back in the market for a place to live.

eddie1's picture

Surely the real 'crisis' in housing has been that those low earners who would once have been able to afford a little terraced house in South Wales for £20,000, a back to back in Leeds for £25,000 or a two up two down in South Manchester for £30,000 in 1996 were suddenly disenfranchised and left scrabbling for a place to house themselves and their families. For many people the only options were the insecurity of renting privately or social housing with all the stigma that goes with it. We now have many thousands of children living in temporary and substandard housing because of the boom in prices. For them the crisis has been sustained and will have an impact on the rest of their lives. Look at Shelter's website for evidence that links poor, overcrowded housing conditions with educational underachievement and psychological damage in children. The sad thing is that whilst a return to 'normal' prices means emerging house buyers will eventually be able to secure themselves a home, many people will have their homes repossessed and then they will enter the nightmare that is queing to be housed by the local authority or the vulnerability of a short tenancy with a private landlord.

Latest tweets