Crash: The housing crisis is just beginning

As Britain wakes up to the nightmare of negative equity, we are facing a housing recession far worse

Kingston Quay in Glasgow is one of the smart dockside developments that were supposed to help regenerate Britain's older industrial cities. The blocks don't look bad, with generous balconies and double-height penthouses. But the truth is that you can hardly give these flats away. A two-bedroom flat, bought for £215,000 in September 2005, recently sold at auction for £79,000; another went for £86,000. Nine others did not sell at all. "Live the dream," said the promotion for these developments; wake up to the nightmare of negative equity.

This story is being replicated in every city in the country as the housing crash gathers momentum. In areas of Manchester and Leeds, and even parts of London, thousands of new-build flats are being offloaded at auction for 30 per cent less than they cost to buy, according to the auctioneers Allsop. The paradox of Britain's slump is that it isn't being led by a sub-prime underclass in run-down areas - although repossessions are rising fast everywhere - but by the "luxury" end of the market. The biggest falls are for the dinky flats bought by urban professionals as "starter homes", or by well-off parents, such as the Blairs, for their children and as pensions. If you have had the misfortune to invest in any of these, look away now, because what follows could seriously damage your wealth.

Let's get the numbers out of the way first. There is no longer a scintilla of doubt that there is a major, national housing correction under way. Nationwide registered a record 2.5 per cent fall in May alone. Analysts such as Morgan Stanley think there could be a 25 per cent decline in two years. The International Monetary Fund estimates that British house prices are overvalued by 30 per cent. A crash is defined as a 20 per cent fall over two years, so fasten your seat belts. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) says a million people face losing their homes over the next 18 months. Northern Rock was the first banking casualty; the buy-to-let flat specialist Bradford & Bingley is the second; others will follow as this second mortgage-related financial shock shreds banking balance sheets and undermines confidence in the financial system.

Even the government accepts that prices will fall by between 5 and 10 per cent this year alone, as the housing minister Caroline Flint's see-through cabinet briefing papers revealed recently (although, curiously, she didn't see fit to tell the country the news herself). Indeed, the government is still actively encouraging first-time buyers into a market that it knows is collapsing. Ministers should be doing precisely the reverse: warning young families not to take on mortgages for flats that will assuredly land them in negative equity.

But the government still believes that, as the property porn queen Kirstie Allsopp puts it, "house prices always go up". In other words, it believes in fairies, and that money grows on trees. Now comes the big bad wolf to the door, and the last thing anyone should think of doing right now is buying a house. At any price. Just say no. You have been warned.

Tens of thousands of relatively high-income homeowners in south-east England have placed their futures in jeopardy by taking on unsustainable jumbo mortgages. You need only look at estate agents' windows to see that the sums don't add up - London prices average £320,000 and are out of all proportion to ability to pay. Gross median full-time earnings in London last year were only £587 a week, according to government statistics. Many young families took out self-certification "liar loans" at five or six times their income as the only way to get on to the housing ladder. Now the banks are forcing them to remortgage at a higher rate and demanding large deposits. Real fear is stalking the capital's nappy valleys.

This is going to be far, far worse than the housing recession of 1990-92. Fuelled by irresponsible bank lending, UK house prices nearly tripled in the decade to 2007 - a more lunatic rise even than in America. British prices have been running at nearly eight times average earnings against a historic average of 3.5. This was never going to be sustainable. But right at the moment the bubble burst, in August 2007, a combination of related events conspired to turn this boom into an epic bust that is likely to consume the British economy and lead to a depression. You may think the credit crisis is over, but the real crisis is just beginning.

First, the banks found that because of the US sub-prime mess they couldn't borrow cheap money on the international markets any more, so they cut back on lending and increased rates. Banks such as Northern Rock, which had been offering "suicide loans" of up to 120 per cent loan-to-value, stopped lending altogether. Not surprisingly, people stopped buying. The number of first-time buyers in March was the lowest ever recorded, fewer than 18,000 in the whole of the UK.

Apoplexy in No 10

Even before the housing slump, buy-to-let investors were losing money because of low rents; now many are being forced to sell, as the banks require them to remortgage at rates of up to 9 per cent. Overall, mortgage lending this year is expected to fall by nearly half, to £60bn, an unprecedented contraction of the market. Estate agents across the land are shutting shop - not that many tears will be shed at their plight. Nor at the loss of the hard-sell property club Inside Track, which promised to make you a millionaire overnight and has now gone bust, leaving many of its clients with huge losses.

The FSA and the police are now investigating 70 separate valuation scams across Britain whereby surveyors fraudulently overestimated the value of thousands of new-build homes. In cities such as Manchester, organised criminals had recycled drug money into property to such good effect that some of them gave up the narcotics trade and turned to property speculation. Now they are regretting it.

What can the government do? Well, Gordon Brown thought he could revive the market by in effect handing £50bn of public money to the banks through the Special Liquidity Scheme and by leaning on the Bank of England to cut interest rates. Not so. The banks took the £50bn in Treasury swaps in April and promptly put mortgage rates up even further. Then in May, Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, announced that there were likely to be no more cuts in interest rates this year because of rising inflation.

This caused apoplexy in No 10. Brown wanted King to emulate Ben Bernanke of the US Federal Reserve, who slashed rates from more than 5.25 to just 2 per cent in eight months. But King stood his ground, and is right to do so. As anyone who goes to the shops knows only too well, the cost of living is rising faster than at any time in the past two decades. Cutting interest rates now could start 1970s-style hyperinflation.

There has been much debate about the causes of the recent global inflation in commodities, but in the end, in the circular world of economics, it all comes back to housing. It was the attempt by the Federal Reserve to revive the US housing market that ignited the current commodities boom. It hoped that slashing interest rates below inflation would encourage people to put their money back into houses. It didn't. Instead, the big investment houses, the pension funds and thousands of in dividuals ploughed their cash into oil, food - anything that looked as if it might become scarce. Roughly 60 per cent of the recent increase in the cost of oil is down to speculation.

In the US, cutting interest rates has actually made house prices fall faster. The increase in gas and food costs has made consumers tighten their belts and avoid mortgages like the plague. US residential property prices fell 14.4 per cent in the first quarter of 2008 - the fastest drop ever recorded by the benchmark Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index. Ten million face negative equity. To top it all, the inflation explosion has forced the Fed to admit that the next movement in US rates will probably be up, though not before the presidential election. Talk about a rock and a hard place. Increasing interest rates in a downturn is what turns recession into depression.

How long will the slump last? Certain demographic factors may prolong the housing depression. The baby-boom generation has now reached retirement age and many couples are relying on their homes as pensions and legacies. If they want to keep their wealth intact, they will have to sell soon. This could lead to an unprecedented number of larger houses coming on the market just at the moment when younger families can't borrow the money to buy them.

Pyramid of credit

The recent house-price boom in Britain has also been fuelled by immigration, much of it from Poland. With the British economy weakening and the pound falling in value, however, many eastern European migrants are returning home. There is still a shortage of houses in Britain, but we are about to find that the shortage is not as great as we thought.

Are falling house prices a bad thing? All things being equal, a return to sanity in the housing market is good for everyone, even estate agents. But we are facing a serious economic dis location here, not just a correction.

It was brought about by the astonishing short-sightedness of central bankers and politicians in Britain and the US who kept interest rates artificially low for more than a decade. A huge inverted pyramid of credit was built on top of the expectation of yields from British and US mortgages. Believing that house prices would rise for ever, and that even if they faltered the Bank of England would cut interest rates to reinflate the bubble, the banks began to lose any sense of financial risk, and started to relax credit standards and lend irresponsibly. Private-equity firms were allowed to borrow huge multiples of their real assets. Banks started to hide their lending in off-balance-sheet devices such as structured investment vehicles.

As house prices fall, this all turns into reverse. Loans de-leverage, derivatives degrade, margin calls are missed. The total value of British residential property is about £3trn. Nearly £1trn of this will now disappear over the next few years if prices fall by 30 per cent. This will have a profoundly deflationary effect, leading to falling high-street sales, business closures, personal bankruptcies and rising unemployment. Mortgage bonds will default, causing further bank crises. Britain depends heavily on the financial services for jobs and 40,000 are about to go in the City alone, according to J P Morgan.

In Britain, homeowners are seeing the value of their properties fall at about £2,000 a month at the same time as the cost of living is rising and their wages and salaries are stagnant. Deluded by house prices, British consumers borrowed and spent like there was no tomorrow. Unfortunately, tomorrow has arrived and consumers are sitting on £1.4trn of debt, the highest for any country in the world. People can no longer defer their loans by remortgaging their properties, and the banks are demanding cash upfront. In the past two months, many consumers have taken out huge one-off credit-card loans, which explains the paradox of recent unsecured lending going up as spending goes down. Shelter has reported that at least a million people are putting mortgage payments on their credit cards - the height of economic madness.

The government is already overdrawn and unable to spend its way out of impending recession. Treasury finances will shrivel after a fall in stamp duty and tax receipts from the collapsing financial services sector. The nationalised Northern Rock has signalled that it won't be able to repay the £26bn it was lent by the government if house prices continue to fall.

No wonder Gordon Brown is looking gloomy. He once joked that there are two kinds of chancellors: failures and those who get out in time. He is no longer chancellor, but as First Lord of the Treasury, the Prime Minister is still in the firing line. The great housing bust of 2008, and the recession that follows it, will be Brown's lasting monument. And poor old prudence never got a look-in.

Iain Macwhirter is an award-winning political columnist for the Glasgow Herald

Housing by numbers

  • 250,000

    UK households in negative equity

  • 50%

    fall in net mortgage lending expected

    this year (down from

    £108bn to £55bn)

  • 12m

    mortgages outstanding in 2007

  • 25%

    predicted average house-price drop during current crash

  • 3,775

    mortgage products available now

  • 15,599

    mortgage products available in July 2007

  • Research by Katie Wake

81 comments

VC's picture

Britain is a close second to the US in the capitalism states nd the gap is closing.

If there is one thing which we have learned over the last few months, it is that capitalism, the ""FREE MARKET" (NWO illusiuon) doesn`t work. The Fed/BofE credit line is public money and it is only this intervention that has kept the banks in business.

"Fair Reason"..Northernrock worked on a business plan which was known to regulators (inc BofE).....no one, including Northernrock expected the banks to break their "cardinal rule"...the never ending free flow of money....this is what Thatcher let out of the bag....and as I understand it, the moment it started, she is alledged to have said "what have I done" (please correct). Northernrock was a "fair reason" victim. If you are a citizen, employed, meet a reasonable criteria for credit and more importantly, offered debt like US sub-prime, then you defalted on "fair reason". In fact, the scandle which is unraveling in the US, could see many of these "sub-prime" defaulters being compensated....many believe they are victims of fraud.....if you can save banks (all)their own corruption, then why not save ordinary people??

"Risk", this is and interesting term. There should be no risk......the big banks spend BILLIONS on eliminating risk...ok, they may encourage brokers to go out on a limb, but another broker is supposed to have it covered. Risk is for idiots and there are plenty around, but being an idiot doesn`t make you guilty if someone traps you in a fraud. I might add that it does`t help whe the financial media are careful with the truth....any BBC Radio 4 message boarders out there? They might remember that I was predicting this crash and I was saying it would be the worst in living memory....much like Soros is today.

We are the little people, the victims of fraud. It doesn`t matter if its housing, or that you are 20% poorer than you were 20 years ago....I know most of you are, but most of you can`t see it....you are victims of globalization and its just another NWO fraud. It is amazing that a family can lose its home, because someone lost their job "fair reason". If banks faced losing their debt and all cliams on the house, they would never impart risk of the citizen.

Petite Anglaise's picture

@knave - of Harrytimmyantileft

"This means either one of two things.

1.You are a liar

2 You are very sad."

It could mean that timmyantileft is both these things ....

charlie.'s picture

antileft - full marks for yumming down your slice of the big sh*t pie with a smile!

"Crapitalism" is my alternative to Capitalism - that is where people work hard and might earn more than others, but then spend their money in such a way as it does not simply give them material benefit (e.g. LCD TV, expensive wine/meals, good-looking but ultimately gold-digging girlfriend), but also intellectual or moral benefit. For example, people who give to charity because some people are born or become disadvantaged.

Let's not forget that some people are not as 'bright' as you, but at the same time there are far brighter people than you who are earning significantly more from their capitalist-gotten gains, doing much more for the benefit of the people around them than you are.

Also, bring on the house price crash - I have been saving and working hard over the last 3-4 years and am now completely debt-free and hold a lovely fat deposit for when the rain turns to a maelstrom.

BillN's picture

@Antileft. I have to laugh when you attempt to lay claim to having enaged in intelligent debate across your posts. I have seen zero evidence to support this claim in any of your text.

I find that there is an inverse relationship between the volume of insults a poster makes concerning the intelligence of other posters and the intelligence evidenced by that postert. I am glad you are doing well in the financial capital stakes; it will compensate for your negative equity in intellectual capital.

Your crass calls for other posters to describe a full blown alternative to capitalism and your demonstration of a total ignoranceof Marx's writings, or incapcaity to undertsand if you have read any, make you appear a total buffoon.

None of the so called communist societies could be said to be based on Marx's "system". As proudlefty indicated Marx never developed a communist system.

His work was primarily an historical political economy that analaysed the capitalist system that replaced feudal political economy. Based on his theory of the structural dynamic of of capitalism he made predictions and tied these to a poltical program.

In terms of communism all Marx really did was paint some broad brush strokes of what a political economy based on enlightenment values would look like.

He made predictions for the future course of events based on his anlaysis of the day. Put yourself in Marx's time and you will appreciate what a brilliant nalysis he actually made and the many ways in which he captured elements of the structural dynamic of capitalism.

He predictions for the collapse of capitalism did not anticipate future developments that rendered them invalid. But it was the essence of Marx's method that analysis should be ongoing and continue to synthesise empirical evidence to develop the theoretical understanding and inform the politcal struggle. Critics often try to discredit Marx's work because hi spredictions did not come true. We are talking about a gu who lived in the 19C remember, that he has any relevence is a testament to his intellectual stature.

What does it say of todays economic commnetators when you consider it is difficult to find one whose predictions still have any credibility within a week of making them.

What is the alternative to Capitalism? It will evolve gradually not as the result of a blueprint, as was the case with capitalism.

But don't make the error of identifying markets with capitalis, markets long predated Capitalism and will no doubht long post date it. Markets exist in shifting institutionalcultural forms and, as a poster above noted, and Sweden demonstartes an excellent exampl eof how shaping the forms from a social democratic politics.

Co-Ops, scoail firms and other forms could gradualy grow in importance, Citizen's incomes, germinal forms exist, could come to be a significant part of each persons income.

As with the tranistion from Feudalism to Capitalism, it will be difficult to know when one starts and the other ends. There will come a time when blogs such as these, or probably some new technological form, will be filled with debats about whether we still live in a capitalist system or not. Transistions can be messy affairs.

stevie dee's picture

@Antileft, I must say, I have found reading your posts both interesting and amusing. I agree that a capitalist or "free market" system is most preferable to any alternative. As in truth, the alternative system is in place at present.. This is not a "Free Market", it is Communism/fascism with flashing lights. I say this for the corruption & criminality now being exposed in relation to the housing market. And with government intervention, special interested mega rich families & corporations, bankers, we are currently experiencing a modern & more refined or sophisticated version of Nazism. Unfortunately, the invisible hand & human nature will either destroy this system or enslave us all still further or for the optimist, bring about positive change. In the worst scenario, they could always rename the planet to "Arbeit machts frei".

paulo1's picture

This the best news we've had for 30 years. For the young who want to buy houses, that is.

Paulo

hotairmail's picture

Excellent article. Just a couple of points. The value of UK housing is about £4 trillion with £1.2 trillion borrowed against it. A fall in the value of equity (or 'notional wealth') is not 'deflationary' in itself. See http://diaryofapropertybear.blogspot.com/2008/06/loss-of-wealth-calculat...

You will note that net lending continues to rise even though transactions are well down - because of the past inflation of house prices being monetised!

charlie.'s picture

Er, "fantasy utopia"? I'm afraid it's very much reality, little man: altruism really exists in the world, just as capitalism does. Therefore it is obviously a behaviour that people generally see as worthwhile and reasonable, or they wouldn't give money away, would they (Hunter, Buffet, Gates, Soros all actually give away 100s of millions of pounds a year - they don't just give it away in the "fantasy utopia" you suggested)?

If it's a "fantasy utopia", how do you think millions of charities exist and survive? Answer: from millions of people selflessly giving their hard-earned cash away to no benefit to themselves. You aren't a very well-developed human being are you? I think you're bitter that, for all your apparent "success", you're still just a tiny little cog in the bigger scheme of things.

charlie.'s picture

Not just billionaires, but billions of perfectly normal people give away money for causes like Children in Need, Comic Relief, etc, you silly selfish extremist.

I work hard for a living in the private sector, but I know that rampant, unthinking capitalism is not an all-encompassing basis for living life. Many successful people (not just billionaires, although I was using them as an example because their type are supposedly the greatest proponents of the capitalism you preach) give money away, support charities, etc, because they know that there is an aspect to human nature that doesn't end with taking money from the weak but also giving some of it to the deserving / needy.

How do you think modern systems that cater to human beings like "Justgiving.com" came about? Answer: because human nature says we need those systems to bahave in an altruistic way that is just as much a part of human nature as your selfish, greedy, extremist aspect is.

I suggest you get out and start volunteering and giving to charity now, before your meaningless, childless life turns out to be meaningless, childless AND very very forgettable. Nobody is "forcing" you (as you posit in such an infantile way) - I'm sure a clever little chap like you can see the benefits of this for yourself!

VC's picture

stevie dee; I must agree with your analysis, but one has to use terminology which people understand....they don`t see our communist system with incentives backed with debt.. You are one of the few people on here who are willing/able to think and debate outside the box. :)

Latest tweets