My advice to Ed Balls: don’t follow Slasher’s lead and promise the earth
Who has really been telling "shameful lies"?
By David Blanchflower Published 04 October 2012
In a speech at the 2009 Conservative party conference in Manchester, George “Slasher” Osborne offered a sneering overview of Labour policy with all sorts of claims about how the streets would be paved with gold if only the Tories were to win the next general election and he was made chancellor. The following spring, after an election a ham sandwich could have won but no one did, the Tories had to form a coalition with a turncoat party that for years had opposed austerity but paused a few days and reversed all of that, once ministerial cars were on offer.
The Lib Dems banked all on the UK economy rising from the ashes; they hoped that there would be an “expansionary fiscal contraction” and growth would emerge before 2015. The governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, has what must be the worst economic forecasting record of any governor in living memory. He failed to spot the recession and the subsequent double dip; he thought that the UK and the US had decoupled; he thought that there would be a wage spiral as a result of union power and appeared to have no clue that LIBOR (the London Inter-bank Offered Rate) was being fiddled, even though it was arguably his job to know. King told the coalition posh boys to slash away and all would be well. But it wasn’t.
Some of us even had the audacity to say all of that stuff was for the birds and warned that the government was committing economic suicide; but nobody much listened and on they ploughed. Sadly, the government is now in deep trouble and knows it. It will be interesting to hear how Slasher plans to wriggle out of this mess at the Tory conference in Birmingham.
Look back in anger
Before that, it seems appropriate to go back and look at the claims Osborne made, in his speech in 2009, about what he would deliver. First, he said that the Tory party would “lead the economy out of crisis”. That could hardly be further from the truth, as the coalition has pushed us into an even deeper crisis. We are in the slowest recovery since the Second World War and are perhaps even heading for a triple dip.
The chart below shows the current estimates of GDP growth along with the initial estimates, as data gets revised all the time. The economy was growing nicely when the coalition took over; it grew for five successive quarters from the third quarter of 2009 up to the third quarter of 2010, under Alistair Darling’s policies. Output is now 4.4 per cent lower than it was at the start of the recession in 2008 and has shrunk in five of the past seven quarters. It takes time for policies to feed through to the data, so if we assume that the coalition owns the data from the fourth quarter of 2010, the economy has shrunk 0.6 per cent.
The recession deniers are clueless. The recession hasn’t been revised away and isn’t going to be; the revisions average 0.1 per cent down over the past 20 quarters. Consumer and business confidence today is lower than it was when the coalition took office. The latest European Union sentiment index for the UK (reported in the second chart, below), which is a combination of business and consumer surveys, stands at 91.9, against 102.4 in May 2010, when the coalition took over. It is markedly lower than in Sweden (100.0), which recently moved to inject a stimulus into its economy. Confidence is especially low in the services sector, with a score of -22, compared to -10 in May 2010.
In November 2010, there were 2,477,000 unemployed, with an unemployment rate of 7.9 per cent. The latest data shows 2,645,000 unemployed in July 2012, with an unemployment rate of 8.2 per cent. Over the same period, average weekly earnings rose 3.3 per cent, while the Consumer Price Index has risen by 6.5 per cent, so real earnings have fallen sharply.
Far from leading us out of crisis, Osborne has made matters worse and pushed the UK economy into a double-dip recession. The latest UK PMI for manufacturing was disappointing, falling from 49.6 to 48.4 (anything below 50 indicates decline). This is the third month of declines and job losses are beginning to mount. The PMI for construction in September showed the biggest decline in new business since April 2009, so there’s little sign of green shoots.
I have every expectation that GDP in the next quarter may be positive but the fourth quarter is likely to be negative. Plus, the deficit is up by 22 per cent so far this year. As the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls, said in his Labour conference speech, we are seeing “rising borrowing, not to invest in the jobs of the future but to pay for the mounting costs of this government’s economic failure. There is nothing credible about a plan that leads to a double-dip recession . . . That’s not credible, that is just plain wrong.”
Holidays in the sun
Second, Osborne argued in 2009 that the Tories would protect public services, claiming: “We’re all in this together.” He had the audacity to repeat this phrase seven times. He then claimed: “Our determination as compassionate Conservatives [is] to protect the most vulnerable.” In truth, the poor are all in it together and the rich are holidaying in the south of France.
Sensibly, Balls hasn’t fallen into the same trap as Osborne did just before the election. He doesn’t need to say too much about what Labour would do, other than to reiterate that he will wait and see how serious is the mess he is likely to inherit. He is entitled to say he warned that this economic disaster was looming and things would have been a lot better had he been in charge. My main advice to Balls, though, is to stay away from the pork pies. We all know who told “shameful lies”.
David Blanchflower is economics editor of the New Statesman and professor of economics at Dartmouth College, New Hampshire.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


61 comments
W Bush also borrowed a hell of a lot of money to fight illegal wars. Not content with that they enticed the UK to do the same and Tony Blair fell for it (good little dog).
Temper temper Inastew. Didn't you know Clinton left office in 2001? Didn't George W use tax cuts to improve the economy? Are you telling me trickle down doesn't work Inastew?.
W Bush cut taxes by $1.2 Trillion dollars and handed the taxpayers a $ 5 trillion debt, no wonder Osborne is a big fan of Bush economics.
Fox you really do not have a clue.
Bush used public money to win votes and power -- just like Hilter and his keynesian policies. Can you think of any UK government that borrowed £600Bn to manipulate the voters? (sorry, forgot you do not think for yourself).
You are really in a bad mood. But ignore the Clinton tax rises my dim-witted friend, shame you just can't handle the facts can you.
I see the latest trade figures in are, the second worst on record, imports up exports down, and industrial output down yet again.
With Osborne now on course to borrow £600 billion in a record 5 years, plus more borrowing on the way post 2015, it must be hard on you to come up with a rational argument.
How does Osborne get away with the claim he has cut the deficit by 25%. I assume he can't be counting Royal Mail pensions in this calculation as this would be misleading at best?
Danny, can you explain where this 25% figure of Osborne's comes from?
Thanks.
Er, that'll be the financial mess that New Labour carried out with the blessing of the financial sector, from which many corporate suits ended up as advisors whispering in NLabour ministers' ears. And who now are still nestling in government, whispering in Cameron and Osborne's ears.
Oh, do keep up.
Yet another piece from the Economics Editor of the NS......long on criticism of the Chancellor and the Governor of the Bank of England, but with no suggestions of how to climb out of the financial mess inherited from New Labour.
I am bored with Blanchflower's constant whingeing analysis. Time for the NS to hire a New Economics Editor, I suggest.
Don't worry I am equally bored of your poor analysis. When Bloomberg television have you as an economics expert, you then get the opportunity to bad mouth Prof Blanchflower.
But don't hold your breathe.
I would have said that if:
The economy was growing nicely when the coalition took over; it grew for five successive quarters from the third quarter of 2009 up to the third quarter of 2010, under Alistair Darling’s policies.
your question has already been answered,but then again i might be wrong because all i did was read the piece not jump to the bottom so i could write a snide remark.
Search the archives there are plenty of ideas.