Show Hide image

On Mark Carney, Osborne’s got it right . . . for once

The choice of the new governor of the Bank of England is a rare triumph for the Chancellor.

The appointment of Mark Carney, the governor of the Bank of Canada and chairman of the G20’s financial stability board, as the new governor of the Bank of England is welcome. I don’t agree with much of anything the Chancellor does but this time is different. I congratulate George Osborne for getting his man. The appointment is a triumph for him.

The Labour Party was rightly supportive. Carney has a degree from Harvard and a Master’s and doctorate from Oxford. He previously lived in the UK for a decade, so he is no stranger. He will move to England with his British wife and four daughters and will apply for British citizenship, which one suspects won’t be a problem. He has had a distinguished career, including time at Goldman Sachs and the Canadian department of finance, and his actions appear to have played an important role in helping Canada perform better than any other G7 country during the financial crisis. Unlike the UK, Canada has a small population and relatively little investment banking, but Carney appears to have the training and the smarts to learn fast.

Little white lies

Just like me, he did not apply for the job he eventually got at the Bank. The announcement came as something of a surprise but we had an inkling of what was coming on 26 November when, with an hour’s notice, Jim Flaherty, the Canadian finance minister, called a press conference for exactly the time Osborne was making his announcement. Carney had denied he was interested but that is understandable, as it was potentially market-sensitive information, especially if he didn’t get the job. Central bankers have to be able to tell white ones with a straight face.

Bringing in an outsider was always the right thing to do, as Alistair Darling recommended months ago, given the failings at both the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority. The failure of Northern Rock and the Royal Bank of Scotland appears to have been a complete surprise, and the Bank failed to spot a huge asset bubble and acted too late to prevent disaster.

The last thing we needed was for the bookies’ favourite, Paul Tucker, deputy governor of the Bank, to get the top job. He had failed to spot the recession or the double dip and was finally done in by his problems over the fixing of the LIBOR rate. Other contenders did not have Carney’s credentials; none would have received the universal acclaim that greeted his appointment.

Carney faces a huge task, not least because the economy remains in the doldrums. On 26 November, the OECD predicted that the UK economy will contract by 0.1 per cent this year, which implies no growth in the fourth quarter (and this may well be optimistic). It seems unlikely that much will have changed by the time the new governor takes over in June.

The biggest task that Carney faces will be to bring together financial regulation and monetary policy under one roof. How this is to be done, including how the Financial Policy Committee will operate, has yet to be determined. He has to create most of the new structures from scratch.

One of his great strengths, in contrast to the present governor, Mervyn King, is that he is said to be a half-decent manager of people. Carney will have to devolve power and, I hope, encourage dissent and bring in his own people. Groupthink needs to be tackled at the Bank of England. Carney’s problems are only just beginning. I wish him all the best.

David Blanchflower is economics editor of the New Statesman

David Blanchflower is economics editor of the New Statesman and professor of economics at Dartmouth College, New Hampshire

This article first appeared in the 03 December 2012 issue of the New Statesman, The family in peril

Show Hide image

No, David Cameron’s speech was not “left wing”

Come on, guys.

There is a strange journalistic phenomenon that occurs when a party leader makes a speech. It is a blend of groupthink, relief, utter certainty, and online backslapping. It happened particularly quickly after David Cameron’s speech to Tory party conference today. A few pundits decided that – because he mentioned, like, diversity and social mobility – this was a centre-left speech. A leftwing speech, even. Or at least a clear grab for the liberal centre ground. And so that’s what everyone now believes. The analysis is decided. The commentary is written. Thank God for that.

Really? It’s quite easy, even as one of those nasty, wicked Tories, to mention that you actually don’t much like racism, and point out that you’d quite like poor children to get jobs, without moving onto Labour's "territory". Which normal person is in favour of discriminating against someone on the basis of race, or blocking opportunity on the basis of class? Of course he’s against that. He’s a politician operating in a liberal democracy. And this isn’t Ukip conference.

Looking at the whole package, it was actually quite a rightwing speech. It was a paean to defence – championing drones, protecting Britain from the evils of the world, and getting all excited about “launching the biggest aircraft carriers in our history”.

It was a festival of flagwaving guff about the British “character”, a celebration of shoehorning our history chronologically onto the curriculum, looking towards a “Greater Britain”, asking for more “national pride”. There was even a Bake Off pun.

He also deployed the illiberal device of inculcating a divide-and-rule fear of the “shadow of extremism – hanging over every single one of us”, informing us that children in UK madrassas are having their “heads filled with poison and their hearts filled with hate”, and saying Britain shouldn’t be “overwhelmed” with refugees, before quickly changing the subject to ousting Assad. How unashamedly centrist, of you, Mr Prime Minister.

Benefit cuts and a reduction of tax credits will mean the Prime Minister’s enthusiasm for “equality of opportunity, as opposed to equality of outcome” will be just that – with the outcome pretty bleak for those who end up losing any opportunity that comes with state support. And his excitement about diversity in his cabinet rings a little hollow the day following a tubthumping anti-immigration speech from his Home Secretary.

If this year's Tory conference wins the party votes, it’ll be because of its conservative commitment – not lefty love bombing.

Anoosh Chakelian is deputy web editor at the New Statesman.