French fury at Economist cover story
Officials defend the “time-bomb at the heart of Europe”.
By Alex Ward Published 19 November 2012
French officials accused the The Economist of sensationalism today after the newspaper ran a cover story outlining the profound weaknesses in the French economy under President François Hollande.
The British weekly chastised Hollande’s economic reforms for lacking ambition and scope, warning that the stagnant French economy could bring the euro to implosion as would-be investors lose faith in the eurozone’s second largest economy:
“Our most recent special report on a big European country (in June 2011) focused on Italy’s failure to reform under Silvio Berlusconi; by the end of the year he was out—and change had begun. So far investors have been indulgent of France; indeed, long-term interest rates have fallen a bit. But sooner or later the centime will drop. You cannot defy economics for long.”
Speaking to Europe 1 Radio, French Industry Minister Arnaud Montebourg moved swiftly to rubbish the speculation:
“Honestly, The Economist has never distinguished itself by its sense of even-handendess”, he said.
“It is the Charlie Hebdo of the City”, he added in reference to the French weekly criticised for publishing inflammatory cartoons of a naked Prophet Mohammad.
Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault followed suit, expressing his outrage on French TV station i>tele:
“You are talking about a newspaper which is resorting to excess to sell paper. I can tell you that France is not at all impressed”.
John Peet, The Economist’s Europe editor who penned the report, defended the magazine in an interview with newspaper 20 Minutes:
“The point of this cover is to encourage France … Other countries including Greece and Portugal have conducted many reforms. This is not yet the case in France”.
France’s public debt hit 90 per cent of GDP this year, with many sceptics doubting Hollande’s ability to trim the 2013 deficit to 3 per cent of output.
Meanwhile, unemployment in France has risen to a 17-year high, with a quarter of 18 to 24-year-olds unable to find work.
Holland has faced plunging popularity ratings since his election as he struggles to invigorate an uncompetitive French economy with sluggish growth prospects.
His deficit-cutting measures are primarily made up of tax increases, which have been roundly criticised for stifling business investment, culiminating in opposition from “Les Pigeons” – a collective of entrepreneurs that vehemently oppose hikes in French corporation tax.
Moody’s, a rating agency, is due to review France’s credit rating this month, which has led analysts to believe that the country could face another downgrade after Stand & Poor’s took away France’s AAA- rating in January.
France narrowly avoided recession on Thursday, when data showed unexpected that the economy had managed to eke out 0.2 per cent growth in the third quarter.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


3 comments
I live in France and have witnessed 18 years of its evolution. I am in broad agreement with The Economist's assessment. I find it frustrating and unfortunate that the majority of French continue to stick their heads in the sand. With government spending at 57% of GDP, rational/educated people must conclude something has to change. The problem seems to be that the culture of entitlement has replaced education (at least regarding economics) for the majority here. The French voted in Hollande. Now we are stuck with the effects of 5 years of half measures and sweaty foreheads...will the bomb go off before or after Hollande is ousted? At least the UK is moving in the right direction by trying to balance the size of government with taxpayer's ability to sustain it. That seems impossible in the land of the lowest common denominator...
"The UK is currently five years ahead of France in terms of adapting and evolving to the new world and the gap is growing."
Where did you get this 5 year gap from? In case you haven't noticed our economy is in the shits too. Economy contracted by 1.1% this year.
The French economy is in a complete mess which has festered away for years but has been suppressed by their government. Their manufacturing is getting canibalised by China and they are running away scared from facing up to their underlying growing structural deficit. The UK is currently five years ahead of France in terms of adapting and evolving to the new world and the gap is growing.
Hollande has tried to restart his distasterous presidency by launching austerity to fix their economy. But France is run by the unions who have blocked it. Consequently, rather than French people retiring at 65, they have chosen to tax tax tax instead.
Its fabulous news for the UK -- there is a wave of France's most wealthy talented people currently moving to the UK ( 2 French millionaires are presently relocating to the UK every day) to take advantage of lower UK taxes.
I'm not the most pro-European but if we can absorb a substantial chunk of France's wealth and talent then the government should be doing everything it can to encourage and accelerate it. Fortunately Hollande is getting on with the job for us.