50 People Who Matter 2010 | 23. Julian Assange
WikiLeaks legend.
By John Pilger Published 21 September 2010
The arrival of WikiLeaks is one of the most exciting developments in the enduring struggle of ordinary people for the right to call secret power to account. This is what journalism should do.
For all the lip-service paid to Edmund Burke's idea of a fourth estate, the media remain an extension of the established order. The current wars demonstrate this. Instead of exposing the lies that have led to the carnage, journalists, with honourable exceptions, have amplified and echoed them. Scott McClellan, George W Bush's former press secretary, says his administration relied on the media's "complicit enablers".
WikiLeaks, says its founder Julian Assange, has "created a space that permits a form of journalism which lives up to the name that journalism has always tried to establish for itself". This year, WikiLeaks has released tens of thousands of official documents that describe the casual, almost industrial killing of civilians, assassination squads, and attempts at cover-up.
Anyone watching the leaked cockpit video of an Apache helicopter gunning down cameramen and children in Baghdad will not forget the pilot's reaction: "Nice." Having witnessed the brutalising effects of war, I felt like cheering when this was exposed and I read that it was viewed 4.8 million times in one week. This is the new "space" for a truth-telling we need urgently, as great power promotes its "perpetual war" and strives for what it calls "information dominance".
I have got to know Julian Assange, and what strikes me most about him is the unabashed morality he invests in WikiLeaks. It is unusual to hear the words: "The goal is justice, the method is transparency." He reminds me of one of our compatriots, Wilfred Burchett, the courageous reporter who incurred the wrath of the powerful by exposing the "atomic plague" of the Hiroshima bomb. Like Burchett, Assange has made some serious enemies for blowing such a loud whistle; the Pentagon has already threatened to "terminally marginalise" WikiLeaks. And this is his great risk and his honour.
I asked him what he had learned most from his glimpses of rampant power. "In one way or another I've been reading generals' emails since I was 17," he said (he is 39), "and what I see now is a vast, sprawling estate that is becoming more and more secretive and uncontrolled. "This is not a sophisticated conspiracy; it is a movement of self-interest to produce an end result that is [the wars in] Iraq and Afghanistan, which are used to wash money out of the US tax base and back to [arms] companies like Northrop Grumman and Raytheon." Another release of leaked documents is due soon.
I salute such principled audacity.
Previous: 22. Angelina Jolie
Next: 24. Lloyd Blankfein
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


37 comments
Of course Assange is doing 'the right thing/s' as well as perhaps occasionally making the human mistakes/errors that we all make (and sometimes should make) and, which we are not always responsible for.
Anyone with even a decent modicum of humanity, intelligence, research and observation skills can see why Wikileaks is an important contribution to the evolution of humanity.
WL has actually been long, so long in the waiting, Pilger knows it, Ellsberg knows it (he says there should be a pentagon papers every year), Amy Goodman, Chris Hedges, Mandela, Cryptome, even the philosopher Derrida discussed the inevitable role computer technology and technology would have in/on freedom of speech and war (democracy after 9/11 etc).
WL's role in our world & these issues have been an expected no brainer for a long long time. And obviously, Assange knows it.
The effects of a very real orwellian control on media and information is incredibly widespread, being a good consumer and citizen means being a good propagandist for corporate and political interests.
Intelligent capable people in journalism still only care about getting a good job in media and are willing to forgo the facts in order to get the best position and pay available. The mentality in our educational institutions is actually leveraged towards this attitude.
The brilliant element of WL is it strikes at the very heart of society and post modern culture, government and law, we are forced to see that we are greedy warmongering genocidal maniacs and this beautifully trickles down into every other area of society that needs to be touched with the truth... The joke that is the publishing industry, the music industry, the arts, the humanities, the hypocritical propaganda machine that is hollywood, etc.. Shedding light on the integrity of these systems while also revealing that we can produce, perform, media, art and music, etc with greater skepticism and integrity, depth.
Because the way things are now does not cut it, the tv saturated, narcissism epidemic is destructive, banal, dangerous, limiting, petty, nihilistic, vapid, old, tired, scary, etc...
The introduction of intelligence into society can be a hard thing to over simplify, which can be troublesome, but, I think a good way to challenge people to work a little harder in learning about how the world they live in works. How they feel about the choices they make.
My hope is that people are tired of talking about cars, handbags and tv sitcoms decade after decade and that maybe people might feel a little more fulfilled in their lives if they knew more about where everything came from, how to go green, how to fight cancer, who made their porn, how deep human feelings go, what is the dream life of humans, what to do about the piles of plastic and garbage that fills the sea, and why is a mental life something inspiring to possess, how to take meaningful risks, etc..
And why educating ourselves is more important now than ever.
WL is an important psychological event for all people.
As far as Assange 'being in the spotlight' who does not need approval?
Seriously.
In his position you would have to be bat dung crazy to not need the support and approval of your peers.
Basic studies show that we work better within a supportive group dynamic and with the recognition and approval of our peers.
Which surgeon would you trust one that wants to work on his own or one that needs and wants the guidance of people working with them that they value and trust?
His stress payload has to be massive.
But he can take it. Or rather, he takes it, imagine that.. !
His needing approval and support from his peers and from his supporters is a healthy reaction, one that we should feel happy about.
If he did not give a crap what anyone thought then that would be something else entirely.
As far as this nonsense in sweden all I can say to that is he can travel anywhere he damned well pleases and good for him, think of that, and- I doubt that this would be the case if he were a 'criminal'.
The 'criminals' are training animals in the swedish government's circus which horribly abused Assanges rights.
You are not under the same dangerous, malicious, illegal, hypocritical and two faced scrutiny he is under.
I actually believe that he's incredibly sensitive, which I view as an asset to what he's doing, acuity, I also think he's trying to 'wake us up' which makes him inevitably and inspiringly a very romantic figure.
These are character elements that are really suited to filling many a disastrous void in our political, social and cultural structures, reawakening our greatest muses, ones which he turns to and shares with us.
The amazing reality is he's far more socially ethical than most people, I am pretty certain he'd be so even if he were not under these conditions simply because he is intelligent and intelligent people always have specific criterion, not expectations, expectations, which are the general norm for most people.
Unless of course we choose to develop an active criterion for ourselves.
Point being, what are you by the will of your own conscience, doing consistently- to better our world?
I hope he continues to find safe harbors and moments of respite, comfort, relaxation, affection and good company, support, release, and the complete freedom to do his work anywhere he sees fit.
He is fighting for your freedom, your privacy, your rights, even your sanity. In many ways, your world and the world your children will inherit.
Be inspired by WL!!
And,
we owe Assange and WL all the respect we can muster.
Maureen Strautman you claim to be a big picture/whole picture person and say that my lack of conformity to your viewpoint is a sign that I lack an independent mind. You sound like an American right-winger.
Why is it that British-Lefties and American hard-Right-wingers always use the same rhetorical forms, the same style of attack, and the same basic arguements.
Now I know Maureen Strautman that you would fight for different thinks than the American Hard Right, but you fight and speak like a Tea Party Fanatic.
Maybe you need to ask if how you fight for your ideals doesn't matter.
MissMusk@ your the one putting the innocent in danger. Assange printed FIRST DRAFT REPORTS!!! He didn't remove the names of Iraqis! He's setting up people, including people not involed in any of these goings on to be shot!
Are you going to unkill those who die to make Assange feel powerful and clever? You and Assange are as irresponcible and brutal as Dick Chenney or George Bush. You don't care who dies, as long as you feel smug.
As for the rape accusations. If he's aquited, well and good. But who are you to convict the victim? I smell hypocracy.
sometimes i am blown away by julian's ability to convey what is going on so succinctly.
... and not so surprised at the appearance of the bogus rape charges, that were dropped.
It was nothing more than a smear attack, and those of us who have bothered looking at all the information available about it find it almost funny when it's rolled out in an attempt to sway peoples opinion about julian and wikileaks.
while i totally agree with matt that the world needs more julian assanges,whats more important in my view is we get more john pilgers.its great that wikileaks releases the information it does but its guys like john pilger who gets in there and digs it out.keep up the good work fellas,and to thomas devine,those are allegations of rape which will never be proven,not even by am american kangaroo court,but then again who knows
I am in awe of the fierce integrity of Julian Assange and the entire WikiLeaks team yet again ...
So John, and what about the alleged deal Assange made with Israel?
So Thomas Devine, what you are saying is...that the three wise monkey approach to accountability is less of a threat to innocents than Assange & co exposing the negation of it by any of the coalition forces.
Good point Mailman! If the Western Governments are as corrupt and evil as he says, how is it that he's allowed to speak? There's always profit and safety in denoucing actual democracies. As the lives of the disadents of China, Myamar, and the Islamic world show, real disadents take serious risks. It isn't a game to speak truth to power when that power is truely corrupt. Julian Assange and John Pilger relish their safety to much to do anything truely brave.