Prince: funk machine
Matt Thorne's biography of Prince reviewed.
By Kate Mossman Published 27 September 2012
Prince
Matt Thorne
Faber & Faber, 562pp, £18.99
Whether or not you’ve paid any attention to Prince in the past 20 years, you’ll probably know three things about him. First, in 1993, in the midst of a spat with Warner Bros, he turned his name into a symbol. Second, in 2007, he played a record-breaking 21 sold-out concerts in less than two months at the O2 Arena in London. Third, he likes to give his records away for free with newspapers. The one-off payment of $500,000 that he trousered for the Mail on Sunday deal in 2007 for the album Planet Earth was reportedly as much as eight times what his previous album had earned him in UK royalties. It was a hands-in-the-air gesture of defiance against changes in the music in - dustry – last year in the Guardian, he compared piracy to “carjacking” and PRs asked the interviewer, “Please do not discuss his views on the internet.”
Matt Thorne’s new biography analyses the legendary hauteur that keeps one of the world’s most influential artists “hiding in plain sight”. “Oh, my God, not another extremist move,” fretted the publicist Howard Bloom when Prince turned his back on the net. “You cannot expunge pieces of life.”
You can, when you inhabit a universe of your making, where critics are “non-singing, nondancing, wish-I-had-me-some-clothes fools”, where no one understands your music but you and every song feeds into a giant super-narrative with Prince at the centre, extolling the four virtues Thorne neatly summarises as love, sex, rebirth and anger. It’s the sex you think of first. I still remember chanting “23 positions in a one-night stand” (from “Gett Off”) in the playground without knowing what it meant.
Fascinating stories kick off this account of Prince’s 34-year recording career. He wrote his first song, “Funk Machine”, at the age of seven; as a teenager in Minneapolis, he took evening classes in music copyright and publishing. His idol Joni Mitchell told Rolling Stone how she had spotted him in the front row of one of her gigs (he was 17), “quite conspicuous, because he’s got those big eyes like a puffin – those big Egyptian eyes”. When he signed to Warner Bros at the age of 19, Prince demanded to produce his records straight off the bat. “Just don’t make me black,” he reportedly added to the A&R man Lenny Waronker.
Thorne is a good stylist and a deep thinker but primarily he’s a fan. This ought to be a disaster but, when tackling Prince, that added layer of obsession carries a rare significance, because more than any other megastar of the 1980s, Prince’s relationship with fans went beyond the call of duty. Forget Lady Gaga’s “little monsters” – in 2000, Prince held a weeklong “open-house” session at his Paisley Park Studios, bringing fans in for exclusive DJ sessions and intimate gigs, letting them dance on his sound stages and tinker with his guitars.
At this time, Prince was an internet pioneer. In February 2001, the New Power Generation Music Club went live, offering fans new songs as and when he uploaded them, in return for a $100 subscription. One track, “Y Should Eye Do That When Eye Could Do This?” referred to his distaste for playing his old hits. Here was a natural control freak, dazzled by the possibilities of artistic liberation in digital music.
It only went sour because he assumed that people would keep paying. Thorne locates the schism at the point LotusFlow3r.com, an online platform for his album LotusFlow3r, was launched in 2009. You had to pay $77 to join and you only got one free song; you could get advance tickets but you had to crack a riddle first. The latest alternative world Prince had created for his followers – Thorne refers to them as “paracosms” – was, in effect, shutting them out. Some of them never came back.
Thorne is a compelling, emotional narrator. More than 500 pages long, this is clearly his attempt at the definitive biography. Yet it is also something else – a lesson in fan devotion, with all the strains and contradictions that entails.
His perspective is particularly useful if you want to know where Prince’s music is “at” nowadays. Loving him more than anyone, Thorne is harsher than any critic would be, despairing at “substandard” releases in recent years – 20Ten is “low quality . . . with terrible cover art”; the track “Purple and Gold” is “dire”; his taste for greatest hits shows is a constant source of pain (“He seems to insiston presenting himself as a heritage act”). Yet Thorne drags himself to these gigs again and again with “low expectations”. Anyone who’s ever truly loved a pop star will recognise the inner conflict between the attachment that cannot be broken and the burning disappointment you feel when you see your idol going off course.
Thorne can’t get Prince out of his system because, as he explains, his hero won’t remove himself entirely from the public eye, the way David Bowie has done. He is a Jehovah’s Witness now; there are rumours that he needs a double hip replacement after years of dancing on stage in high heels and the religion won’t sanction the operation. He seemed perfectly robust at the Hop Farm festival last year. “The ‘now-you-see-me-now-you-don’t’ of the last decade has proved exhausting,” writes Thorne sadly, “at least for those of us still paying attention . . .”
Kate Mossman is the New Statesman’s pop critic.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


4 comments
Comments on this article are now closed.
Like many artists ( in all art forms) who continue to create after their mainstream popularity has peaked Prince HAS to keep playing his hits, because that is what the audience not only want, but demand. I saw this myself in Rotterdam in 2011. I saw the same thing when Blondie toured in 2010 and played some great new songs, to which the majority of the audience responded with polite applause while the Top 40 hits were greeted with riotous acclaim. I rarely go and see older artists now, because the timidity and addiction to nostalgia of audiences substantially prevents artists from exploring and presenting new material, and ironically keeps them on the same old (sound)track because only a passionate few get to know the newer, sometimes more adventurous material. Prince is a prime example.
I wholly disagree that 20Ten was a throwaway release, especially by Prince's standards - have an eye at The Slaughterhouse, C-Note, The War or the many instrumental albums which he has put out over the years. It was tight, came in at under 50 minutes, and had three of the best songs he has done post 1990s. Future Love Song is mentioned, but Sticky Like Glue is Dirty Mind / Controversy quality filth funk. Laydown, as mentioned by outfits like Rolling Stone could have and should have been a killer single. The delivery method may bother but the record is good work.
Further, I figure that in spite of his extreme level of output - or perhaps because of it - there is great material to be found after he dropped off the mainstream radar. Emancipation may be a ridiculous length, but it has a ridiculous amount of good tracks - Right Back Here In My Arms, Somebody's Somebody, Emale, Joint 2 Joint are all up there with the best work he has done - and even obscenely strange albums like The Rainbow Children have high level funk and musicianship. Family Name may be the funkiest thing he has done.
Considering the way in which albums as a unified work are becoming redundant - not as artistic direction, but as far as the general music consuming public are concerned - off the back of digital and free music gubbins, it is not nearly as relevant as it once was to worry about how much material Prince has put out or not put, or how one album is flawed or obese or what have you. As far as individual songs go, I'd wager that Prince is actually a disturbingly consistent sort. His delivery method and care with assembling albums, or singles has suffered most, but for those who care to look there is great work to experience from the 1990s/ 2000s.
Supercute - The Chocolate Invasion: yeah, essentially thrown away via the NPG website, but this is a hit ready track that has a better hook than anything from the same year's Musicology - itself a pretty strong outing.
Have a Heart - One Nite Alone: beautiful piano led album that was with the NPG version of the live box with the same name. Brief song, but full of the kind of mixture of astonishing performance and ballady hooks that informed The Beautiful Ones, Electric Intercourse and Condition of the Heart.
Come On - New Power Soul: Not a great album, but this has one of the best hooks out of any of his song. Up high, gloomy Camille like perversion. Sex doom.
A Million Day - Musicology: By my reckoning the best song on Musicology. Beautiful slow burner that rightfully recalls Purple Rain era Prince.
Comeback - The Truth: A companion album to One Nite Alone really, mostly acoustic guitar based songs. Like Have a Heart, brief but beautiful love song.
3121 - 3121: Again, while Camille as a credit may have ended with Scarlet Pussy around Lovesexy, there is a tone and perversion that creeps in when Prince decides to pitch shift the hell out of his voice. This seemed like a definite return of that kind of dark mood.
Days of Wild - Crystal Ball compilation: This was recorded around the Gold Experience - which is a stunner of an album if you can get a hold of it - and remains one of Prince's best funk jam rap combinations. One of the live stand outs from the mid 90s without a doubt.
He tantrummed his way out of a career...