I like being spoiled rotten

Why spoilers don't spoil.

Spoiler alert: he doesn't make it. Photograph: Getty Images
Spoiler alert: he doesn't make it. Photograph: Getty Images

If you haven’t yet seen Titanic, I won’t spoil the ending for you. Just try not to invest emotionally in the boat, or the blond guy. At least one of them will go on to make The Man in the Iron Mask.

Some people become quite touchy about coming across “spoilers” before watching a film or when immersed in a TV series. Personally, I quite like to know what I’m letting myself in for. I also prefer to jump around in books – skipping ahead a few chapters, or reading the end first, just so I know I’m heading towards a good bit. It helps me get through descriptions of military techniques, or sunsets, or the part where Jack teaches Rose to “spit like a man”.

This has been known to annoy people, but a recent study is very much on my side. It finds that I’m simply getting the best out of the story: too much narrative suspense can turn us off, rather than hooking us in. In fact, when following a plot, we don’t like surprises any more than the passengers on the Titanic did. 

The study conducted by Nicolas Christenfeld and Jonathan Leavitt took 30 undergraduates and gave them a mix of short stories to read. There were three kinds: mysteries, literary stories, and stories with an ironic twist. Everyone got one unaltered story, another with a spoiler in the preface, and a third with the spoiler woven into the narrative. When they measured the subjects’ levels of enjoyment, the researchers found something odd.  The spoiled stories were far more pleasurable than the unspoiled.

Why was this? The researchers thought it meant that plots are just excuses for showing off great writing. The enjoyable bit is the way the story is told, the plot itself an irritating distraction. Best to get all that wearying intrigue out of the way right at the start.

They thought this could also apply to film. Story telling is always a mix of tension and resolution, but knowing the iceberg definitely “does a Trenton Oldfield” in the end frees us up to appreciate the more subtle tensions – those between characters, and those between shots. It also gives us the pleasure of anticipation. We really don’t like having to worry about whether the boy gets the girl, or whether the villain dies, or whether the gob that Kate Winslet spits off the balcony and onto the snooty lady’s hat will be adequately apologised for later (no).

Take note, film makers. You may have enjoyed making Inception (another great Leonardo film), but that’s absolutely no reason to make the rest of us suffer. Go home, think about what you have done, then remake Pride and Prejudice, again. It’s what we all want.

8 comments

Virgil Musat's picture

Interesting article ,congratulations.
jocuri

fpodfsd's picture

Nice videos!

Wonderful.Share with you ,

mcaf.ee/5zn47

Stephen W's picture

I totally agree that plots are just a good an excuse to frame lots of good writing. Something with a great plot but crap writing is no use to anyone. Good enough writing can turn even the lamest plot into a gripping masterpiece. That's a clear fact.

AlexTom's picture

This is an interesting and short, but thought provoking article.

I'm one of those that enjoys reading about the end of a story first, and then gradually learn about the beginning. I've had people say, "wow, that is boring", but we are not all the same.

Yet it is quite fascinating that most of the stories we read, like you said, are really repeats of previous ones but with slight differences.

I think we are predisposed to be fixated on certain archetypes of the unconscious to conquer our fears, to feel something desirable (e.g., laughter) and work on unresolved issues, just like with dreams. Hence, movies and stories.

By the way, you mention a research study, but I don't see a reference section. It would be nice to have the link of the study so others can look it up and read it as well.

Aside from this, nice article.

Jamie Smith's picture

Some people don't mind spoilers.

Some people do.

That's it, isn't it?

Euan McArthur's picture

Might it be that this is partly reflective of individual dispositions towards the world? Some of us want a larger degree of discretion than others over what is coming to us, or perhaps believe in fate, vaguely believing that the denouement to our own lives in immanent in the preceding parts, and wish to read this in literature; others appreciate the more "contingent" nature of reality and are more at peace with blind alleyways and missed opportunities, or cognitive "failures", i.e. the "anticipations" that never come to fruition, needing less of a holistic resolution. Within films, the degree to which the plot is obvious at any one time is reflective of such dispositions.

candiceslegacy's picture

I too am one who reads ahead in the book to the end of some of the chapters to see where it is going...i dont mind being told what is going to happen next...as a matter of fact with tear jerker movies, i do better to know that is that type of movie...some of us have to be in the right mind set to watch sadness.I did see Titanic, and it was one of my favorite romantic movies of all time.
http://www.legacylegal.com/info_improvemycreditscore.asp

Latest tweets