Millionaire men don't like millionaire women

"Bossy, middle-aged millionaires" only attractive to women.

Millionaire men prefer to date non-millionaire women as they don’t like to be challenged by their partners, while HNW women are more likely to be interested in men with the same level of wealth.

That’s according to a survey of 15,000 individuals by Millionaire Match, an online dating website that claims it only has wealthy members, including CEOs, entrepreneurs and professional athletes, as well as beauty queens, models and celebrities.

The research confirmed the stereotype of men not being able to be around powerful women, as it found that 79.6 per cent of the men surveyed wanted to date less wealthy women, while 84.5 per cent of the women interviewed preferred to go out with other fellow wealthy individuals.

When asked why, HNW men said they preferred "younger, attractive women" to a "bossy, middle-aged millionaire". Perhaps the same "reasoning" can explain why women represent only 17.4 per cent of directors of FTSE 100 companies.

Women, however, said they wanted to remain in control of their finances and were not interested in "carrying the whole financial burden". One of the women surveyed – who said to be worth more than $100m – said she was "not looking to take care of anybody". 

Giulia Cambieri writes for Spears

This piece first appeared on Spear's Magazine

Donald Trump. Photograph: Getty Images

This is a story from the team at Spears magazine.

Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Voters are turning against Brexit but the Lib Dems aren't benefiting

Labour's pro-Brexit stance is not preventing it from winning the support of Remainers. Will that change?

More than a year after the UK voted for Brexit, there has been little sign of buyer's remorse. The public, including around a third of Remainers, are largely of the view that the government should "get on with it".

But as real wages are squeezed (owing to the Brexit-linked inflationary spike) there are tentative signs that the mood is changing. In the event of a second referendum, an Opinium/Observer poll found, 47 per cent would vote Remain, compared to 44 per cent for Leave. Support for a repeat vote is also increasing. Forty one per cent of the public now favour a second referendum (with 48 per cent opposed), compared to 33 per cent last December. 

The Liberal Democrats have made halting Brexit their raison d'être. But as public opinion turns, there is no sign they are benefiting. Since the election, Vince Cable's party has yet to exceed single figures in the polls, scoring a lowly 6 per cent in the Opinium survey (down from 7.4 per cent at the election). 

What accounts for this disparity? After their near-extinction in 2015, the Lib Dems remain either toxic or irrelevant to many voters. Labour, by contrast, despite its pro-Brexit stance, has hoovered up Remainers (55 per cent back Jeremy Corbyn's party). 

In some cases, this reflects voters' other priorities. Remainers are prepared to support Labour on account of the party's stances on austerity, housing and education. Corbyn, meanwhile, is a eurosceptic whose internationalism and pro-migration reputation endear him to EU supporters. Other Remainers rewarded Labour MPs who voted against Article 50, rebelling against the leadership's stance. 

But the trend also partly reflects ignorance. By saying little on the subject of Brexit, Corbyn and Labour allowed Remainers to assume the best. Though there is little evidence that voters will abandon Corbyn over his EU stance, the potential exists.

For this reason, the proposal of a new party will continue to recur. By challenging Labour over Brexit, without the toxicity of Lib Dems, it would sharpen the choice before voters. Though it would not win an election, a new party could force Corbyn to soften his stance on Brexit or to offer a second referendum (mirroring Ukip's effect on the Conservatives).

The greatest problem for the project is that it lacks support where it counts: among MPs. For reasons of tribalism and strategy, there is no emergent "Gang of Four" ready to helm a new party. In the absence of a new convulsion, the UK may turn against Brexit without the anti-Brexiteers benefiting. 

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.