Five questions answered on the sale of Lloyds’ Spanish division

The company has not been doing well of late.

Lloyds banking group has announced it is selling its Spanish retail division to Spanish Bank business Banco Sabadell. We answer five questions on the deal.

How much has Lloyds sold its Spanish division for?

It has sold its Spanish retail banking business to Banco Sabadell for 1.8 per cent stake in the Spanish bank, which it will hold for at least two years. The deal also includes the transfer of £1.5bn of assets, such as retail mortgages and deposits. However, its corporate banking division wasn’t included in the sale.

Lloyds said the stake is worth about 84m euros ($110m; £72m). As a result of the sale the bank will make a £250m loss it said.

Banco Sabadell may also be required to pay a further £17m over the next five years, dependent on the profitability of the mortgage business.

Why is Lloyds selling off the Spanish part of its business?

Lloyds said the sale was part of its plan to reduce its international presence.

According to Reuters, Lloyds is cutting its presence from around 30 countries and has already sold operations in 12 countries over the last two years. The company wants to be in less than 15 countries by 2014.

It has also been trying to sell branches in the UK, as is required by European regulators as part of the government take over deal.

How big is Lloyds’ Spanish division?

It has total assets of £1.52 bn, which consist mainly of retail mortgages and deposits, plus 28 offices and a local investment management business.

It lost 43 million euros last year.

How well is the Spanish Bank Banco Sabadell doing?

Shares in the bank were 1.58 euros this morning, after they shed 30 per cent since August last year.

How well has Lloyds been doing of late? 

The 39 per cent state owned bank has faced billions of pounds of losses recently in countries such as Ireland and Australia.

It was also dealt a blow last week when the Co-operative group pulled out of a deal to buy more than 600 branches of Lloyds. The bank is now planning to sell the branches as a stand-alone bank through stock market listing.

Photograph: Getty Images

Heidi Vella is a features writer for Nridigital.com

Show Hide image

Will Euroscepticism prove an unbeatable advantage in the Conservative leadership race?

Conservative members who are eager for Brexit are still searching for a heavyweight champion - and they could yet inherit the earth.

Put your money on Liam Fox? The former Defence Secretary has been given a boost by the news that ConservativeHome’s rolling survey of party members preferences for the next Conservative leader. Jeremy Wilson at BusinessInsider and James Millar at the Sunday Post have both tipped Fox for the top job.

Are they right? The expectation among Conservative MPs is that there will be several candidates from the Tory right: Dominic Raab, Priti Patel and potentially Owen Paterson could all be candidates, while Boris Johnson, in the words of one: “rides both horses – is he the candidate of the left, of the right, or both?”

MPs will whittle down the field of candidates to a top two, who will then be voted on by the membership.  (As Graham Brady, chair of the 1922 Committee, notes in his interview with my colleague George Eaton, Conservative MPs could choose to offer a wider field if they so desired, but would be unlikely to surrender more power to party activists.)

The extreme likelihood is that that contest will be between two candidates: George Osborne and not-George Osborne.  “We know that the Chancellor has a bye to the final,” one minister observes, “But once you’re in the final – well, then it’s anyone’s game.”

Could “not-George Osborne” be Liam Fox? Well, the difficulty, as one MP observes, is we don’t really know what the Conservative leadership election is about:

“We don’t even know what the questions are to which the candidates will attempt to present themselves as the answer. Usually, that question would be: who can win us the election? But now that Labour have Corbyn, that question is taken care of.”

So what’s the question that MPs will be asking? We simply don’t know – and it may be that they come to a very different conclusion to their members, just as in 2001, when Ken Clarke won among MPs – before being defeated in a landslide by Conservative activists.

Much depends not only on the outcome of the European referendum, but also on its conduct. If the contest is particularly bruising, it may be that MPs are looking for a candidate who will “heal and settle”, in the words of one. That would disadvantage Fox, who will likely be a combative presence in the European referendum, and could benefit Boris Johnson, who, as one MP put it, “rides both horses” and will be less intimately linked with the referendum and its outcome than Osborne.

But equally, it could be that Euroscepticism proves to be a less powerful card than we currently expect. Ignoring the not inconsiderable organisational hurdles that have to be cleared to beat Theresa May, Boris Johnson, and potentially any or all of the “next generation” of Sajid Javid, Nicky Morgan or Stephen Crabb, we simply don’t know what the reaction of Conservative members to the In-Out referendum will be.

Firstly, there’s a non-trivial possibility that Leave could still win, despite its difficulties at centre-forward. The incentive to “reward” an Outer will be smaller. But if Britain votes to Remain – and if that vote is seen by Conservative members as the result of “dirty tricks” by the Conservative leadership – it could be that many members, far from sticking around for another three to four years to vote in the election, simply decide to leave. The last time that Cameron went against the dearest instincts of many of his party grassroots, the result was victory for the Prime Minister – and an activist base that, as the result of defections to Ukip and cancelled membership fees, is more socially liberal and more sympathetic to Cameron than it was before. Don’t forget that, for all the worry about “entryism” in the Labour leadership, it was “exitism” – of Labour members who supported David Miliband and liked the New Labour years  - that shifted that party towards Jeremy Corbyn.

It could be that if – as Brady predicts in this week’s New Statesman – the final two is an Inner and an Outer, the Eurosceptic candidate finds that the members who might have backed them are simply no longer around.

It comes back to the biggest known unknown in the race to succeed Cameron: Conservative members. For the first time in British political history, a Prime Minister will be chosen, not by MPs with an electoral mandate of their own or by voters at a general election but by an entirelyself-selecting group: party members. And we simply don't know enough about what they feel - yet. 

Stephen Bush is editor of the Staggers, the New Statesman’s political blog. He usually writes about politics.