The UK is opposing attempts to impose a 40 per cent quota for women on all boards for companies listed within the EU, and has just recieved enough support to block it. According to the FT, a draft letter signed by nine labour and business ministers said:
We agree with the commission’s stance that there are still too few women on the boards of publicly listed companies
[But] we reiterate that any targeted measures in this area should be devised and implemented at national level. Therefore, we do not support the adoption of legally binding provisions for women on company boards at the European level.
The FT has reported that many businesses are opposed to female quotas, with Business Europe, the largest employers group in the EU, saying that they fail to address the real problems with equality in businesses.
It's a fraught issue, and over the last few years there's been much back-and-forth about whether quotas damage or promote women's interests. It's irritating to see the same arguments trotted out again and again, so here's a summary of some of the strongest in both directions:
1. Here's a pretty strong one to start with: quotas are the quickest and most effective way to ensure more equal numbers of men and women on boards.
2. Quotas force the break up of elite circles that might otherwise remain unchallenged.
3. If women are promoted into positions of power, they can act as positive role models for others.
4. Once on the board, women are more likely to hire more women.
5. Quotas are not disciminatory, they simply correct existing discrimination. Is there existing discrimination? Well yes, if you a) believe that there are as many competent potential female board members as their male counterparts and b) take stock of the current imbalance in numbers.
1. Quotas discriminate against the individual men who happen to be running against a woman for a seat.
2. If women are employed through quotas, they will be seen as "token", will be less respected and will have less power.
3. Quotas set women against each other, competing for a certain number of "women's seats", which might destroy co-operation and unity.
4. Instating a quota might lend businesses to view them as a ceiling rather than a floor on the number of women, stalling progress on equality in the long run.
So there they are. Have I missed any? Please leave a comment....